<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Drought Network News (1994-2001)</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2008 University of Nebraska - Lincoln All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews</link>
<description>Recent documents in Drought Network News (1994-2001)</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:19:20 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	



<item>
<title>China&#146;s Drought Climate Monitoring System</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/109</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/109</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:54:34 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In China, about 50% of the country is in arid and
semiarid regions. Drought is the most severe climate
disaster to affect China, and it causes significant reductions
in grain yields. The area affected annually
by drought has been estimated at about 20 million ha,
which accounts for 59% of the total area affected by
disasters. When severe droughts occur, they can affect
as much as 33 million ha. 
To monitor the occurrence and development of
droughts efficiently and provide information on the
strength and range of droughts and floods, the China
Drought-Flood Climate Monitoring System was developed
by the National Climate Center (NCC) in
June 1995. The system can monitor the occurrence
and development of droughts and floods and analyze
disasters comprehensively. Since July 1996, directors
of the China Meteorological Administration have
been able to obtain information on national drought/
flood occurrence on a daily basis through a computer
network using the system. The system provides a
scientific basis for the government to take measures to
prevent drought/flood disasters and safeguard lives
and property. The system is also used to study and
forecast drought/flood climate.</description>

<author>Zhu Changhan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Using the SPI to Monitor the 1999-2000 Drought in Northeastern Argentina</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/108</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/108</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:50:23 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought risk is a major concern across many regions
of Argentina because precipitation is extremely
variable. One of these regions, the Pampas, is the main
agricultural and livestock production area, extending
over 60 million hectares. This region was recently
surveyed to detect, monitor, and assess the occurrence
of drought using a network of 27 meteorological stations
and the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI),
developed by McKee et al. (1993). The SPI has
various categories that define drought intensities. A
period is considered humid when the SPI value is
greater than +1 and a period is considered dry when
the value of the SPI is less than -1. The persistence of
the extreme values was also analyzed temporally and
spatially. 
During the second half of 1999, the region most
affected by drought was the agriculturally productive
northeastern region of Argentina (Figure 1). The start
of the normal rainy season was delayed for several
months, further aggravating the problem and causing
crop damage and production losses. This drought was
due to the cumulative effect of inadequate rainfall during
the 1999-2000 growing season. Several provinces
in Argentina experienced the severe drought, with Entre
Rios (Concordia and Gualeguychu), Buenos Aires
(Junin, Nueve de Julio, and Bolivar), Sante Fe
(Rosario and Ceres), and Córdoba (Villa María de Río
Seco) being the most affected during January 2000
(Figure 1).</description>

<author>Roberto Zanvettor</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought in Beijing, 1992-93</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/107</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/107</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:50:21 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Beijing, located in northeast China, has a semiarid monsoon climate, with
summer rainfall providing about 70% of the annual precipitation. This
climate is conducive to crop growth, although insufficient summer rainfall in
1992-93 caused reductions in crop yields. Normalized departures of monthly
precipitation (DR/R%) are shown in Figure 1. Although some months show
above-normal precipitation (for example, November 1992, with a rainfall
amount [43.3 mm] 7.5 times the normal), rainfall for the 1993 growing period
was marked by negative departures from normal. Of the months of the 1993
growing season, only July recorded above-normal rainfall. Precipitation
departures in May, September, and October 1993 were greater than 50%; as
a result, summer corn did not germinate in some mountain areas, and it was
difficult to seed winter wheat. Corn and wheat yields, in turn, were reduced.</description>

<author>Zhuang Xie</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Western Drought Coordination Council: Frequently Asked Questions</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/106</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/106</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:43:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Contents:

What is the Western Drought Coordination
Council (WDCC)?

What does the WDCC hope to accomplish?

What prompted the formation of the
Council?

Preparedness and Mitigation

Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction

Response

Communications

To Whom does the WDCC report?

How do I get in touch with the Council?</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: Summer 2000</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/105</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/105</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:38:53 PDT</pubDate>
<description>We had a fairly good response to the call in the previous issue of Drought Network News for
readers to receive future issues online. I would encourage more of you to consider this option, as it
will save distribution costs and expedite receipt of the newsletter. If you are willing to receive the
newsletter electronically, please contact Kim Klemsz (kklemsz2@unl.edu). Our plan is to notify you
via e-mail when each new issue of Drought Network News is available. Back issues of Drought
Network News are also available online. 
At this writing, I am making final preparations for the Expert Group Meeting on Early
Warning Systems for Drought Preparedness and Drought Management. This meeting, hosted by
the Institute of Meteorology, will be held in Lisbon, Portugal, in early September. Co-sponsors
of the meeting are the World Meteorological Organization, Secretariat of the U.N. Convention
to Combat Desertification, and UNDP's Office to Combat Desertification and Drought. The
purpose of the meeting is to assess the status of drought early warning systems and determine
future needs to better contribute to the increasing demand for drought mitigation and planning
efforts.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Improving Drought Early Warning Systems in the Context of Drought Preparedness and Mitigation</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/104</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/104</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:35:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Effective drought early warning systems are an
integral part of efforts worldwide to improve drought
preparedness. Timely and reliable data and information
must be the cornerstone of effective drought policies
and plans. In pursuit of the goal of improving the
effectiveness of drought early warning systems, participants
of the experts meeting were asked to address
three fundamental questions: 


1. What is your assessment of the current status of
drought early warning systems? 

2. What are the shortcomings, limitations, and needs
for drought early warning systems? 

3. How can drought early warning systems be improved
to better support drought preparedness
and mitigation efforts at the local, national, and
international level?
Participants identified the primary users of data and
information derived from drought early warning systems
as a first step in evaluating the status of early
warning systems. Users were diverse, including government
agencies, farmers, extension services, insurance
companies, media, donors, NGOs, and the general
public. Leadership for drought early warning systems
is provided principally by meteorological or agricultural
services. In general, where meteorological services
were the lead agency, the information tended to
be more meteorologically based. In contrast, leadership
for drought early warning systems that were more
agriculturally based tended to take a more
multidisciplinary or integrated approach to monitoring.
An integrated approach is considered preferable because
information from all elements of the hydrologic
system must be considered to obtain a comprehensive
assessment of climate and water supply conditions.
Although forecasting and monitoring are considered
critical components of all early warning systems, there
appeared to be little evidence of the beneficial use of
that information by farmers. 
It was noted that few countries currently have a
national drought policy in place. Australia is an exception
and progress in South Africa and the United States
was noted. It was apparent that other countries were
moving in the direction of a national drought policy. In
some instances, subnational policies were in existence.
Comprehensive early warning systems should be the
foundation on which national drought policies and plans
are constructed. Although many countries have some
type of drought early warning system in place, these
systems are not comprehensive and have very limited
financial and human resource inputs.</description>

<author>Donald Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: Spring 2000</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/103</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/103</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:31:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description>I hope that those of our readers with Internet access will consider receiving future issues of
Drought Network News online. We realize that some of you do not have access to the Internet, so
we will continue to publish hard copies of the newsletter. If you are willing to receive the newsletter
electronically, please contact Kim Klemsz as soon as possible. Our plan is to notify readers via email
when each new issue of Drought Network News is available. Back issues of the newsletter are
also available online.
This is a joint winter/spring issue of Drought Network News. It contains considerable discussion
about drought indices and a description of a new product, the Drought Monitor, that is available on the World Wide Web. This new product is the result
of a partnership formed in spring 1999 between the
Joint Agricultural Weather Facility of the U.S. Department
of Agriculture, the Climate Prediction Center
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
and the National Drought Mitigation Center
at the University of Nebraska. The Drought Monitor
integrates climate information and information from a
variety of indices to determine drought severity across
the United States. This product is updated weekly and
has been well received by technical specialists, policy
makers, the media, and commercial groups. I encourage
readers to visit the Drought Monitor website
(http://enso.unl.edu/monitor/) to learn more about
this activity and to consider how this approach might
be modeled for other countries or regions.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: May-August 1999</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/102</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/102</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:04:43 PDT</pubDate>
<description>With increased understanding of El Niño and La Niña events and growing awareness of the wide range
of potential impacts, as well as the increased reliability of seasonal climate forecasts for some regions of the
world, there is growing interest in the use of climate information to help reduce risk for some weather-sensitive
industries, especially agriculture. The National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC) is currently involved in
a project sponsored by the UNDP Office to Combat Desertification and Drought (UNSO) and the World
Meteorological Organization, with additional support from NOAA and USAID. The next phase of this project
will be a workshop, Coping with Drought in Sub-Saharan Africa: Best Use of Climate Information, that will
be held near Harare, Zimbabwe, October 4-6, 1999. This workshop will bring together local, regional, and
international experts to discuss the use of both contemporary and indigenous climate information by farmers
in Africa. The objectives of the workshop are to (1) define elements of a program that will address gaps that
exist between climate information products provided by meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological services
and the ability of farmers to access and use this information in support of decision making; (2) demonstrate how
climate information can be incorporated in farm-level decisions to reduce the impacts of drought and other
climatic extremes on agriculture and maximize productivity during more favorable growing conditions; and
(3) develop a strategy to implement pilot studies in selected countries in sub-Saharan Africa that will
demonstrate the value of climate information in decision making at the farm level and enhance the drought
knowledge of farmers. Farmer surveys on the use and sources of climate information have been conducted in
six sub-Saharan African countries: Kenya, Ethiopia, Mali, Senegal, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique. The
workshop will serve as a forum to bring together potential partners for the next phase of the project. I will try
to include a summary of this workshop and its findings in the next issue of this newsletter. If you would like
to obtain more information on the project, contact the National Drought Mitigation Center or the UNDP/UNSO
web site (http://www.undp.org/seed/unso/tables.htm).</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: February 1999</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/101</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/101</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:00:57 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Many of the readers of Drought Network News are familiar with the "hydro-illogical cycle" cartoon that
I use frequently in presentations and publications. This illustration has been translated into many languages
and serves as a constant reminder of the crisis management mentality often displayed in responding to
drought emergencies and the proverbial "window of opportunity" following a drought when planning for the
next event is of high priority. I hear comments routinely from government officials that recognize the need to
plan, but they express hesitancy in moving forward now if water supply conditions are normal or above. The
concern is that actions to plan for drought might be viewed by political opponents or the public as
misdirected. Politicians certainly do not want to be viewed as placing emphasis and expending resources on
what may appear to be an issue that lacks urgency when other crises exist. As drought planners, perhaps we
should pray for dry conditions so that proper attention will be given to this important component of water
resources planning. 
After experiencing droughts in 1996 and 1998, the Southwest and southern Great Plains states are
bracing for another dry year in 1999. The long-lead forecasts of NOAA's Climate Prediction Center place
considerable confidence in a very dry 3-month period from March through May in this region. Much concern
exists in Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona about the potential threat of another year of drought. Texas and
New Mexico have made considerable progress in drought planning since 1996, and these plans are likely to
be tested severely if drought recurs this year.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: February 1997</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/100</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/100</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:00:54 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In the October issue of Drought Network News, I briefly discussed two policy initiatives that developed
in response to the severe and widespread drought that affected the Southwest and southern Great Plains
states in the United States during 1996. The first of these activities, a multistate workshop (and its
subsequent report), was coordinated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. This report was
submitted to President Clinton in late August; it contained a series of recommendations that focused on
short- and long-term issues. The second initiative, under the leadership of the Western Governors'
Association (WGA), was not available in final form as we went to press with the last issue of the newsletter. 

This report is now available and is summarized below.
In June 1996, the WGA adopted a resolution, sponsored by Governor Johnson of New Mexico: "The
western governors believe that a comprehensive, integrated response to drought emergencies is critical
. . .[and that] it is important to work together and cooperatively with other affected entities to plan for
and implement measures that will provide relief from the current drought and prepare for future drought
emergencies." From this resolution, a WGA drought task force was created and charged with (1)
coordinating the drought response needs of the states by immediately identifying barriers to effective
response at the federal level; (2) working with existing state, federal, and private entities to develop criteria
for assessing various stages of drought and corresponding emergency response measures and mutual
assistance; and (3) sharing solutions and relief measures that can be implemented within the states and
localities in the West. Beginning with a meeting of the Drought Task Force in September, four working
groups (drought management, agriculture, water resources, and wildfire and forest health) began working
on a report that was to be presented at the November 1996 meeting of the 19 western governors.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: Fall 2000</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/99</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/99</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:56:51 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The NDMC hosted the first annual "Drought Monitor Forum" in November. Most of the readers of
Drought Network News are probably aware of the Drought Monitor web site (http://enso.unl.edu/
monitor/index.html) and the products that are provided to users. (Mark Svoboda of the NDMC
provided an overview of the Drought Monitor product in the Winter/Spring 2000 issue of Drought
Network News.) This weekly product, jointly produced by the NDMC, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, and NOAA's Climate Prediction Center, has been widely accepted in the United States,
and other countries are considering the adoption of a similar technique for mapping drought occurrence
and classifying severity levels. The web site receives about 30,000 hits a week and is published widely
in newspapers across the country. It has also been adopted by The Weather Channel. 
A diverse set of users and technical specialists came together to review the product's successes and
failures during its first year. We also discussed some of the more technical aspects of product
development such as nomenclature and the use or modification of climate indices for incorporation in a
blended index. Expect to see changes in the product, some subtle and some more dramatic, in the
months ahead. We also expect NOAA's National Climatic Data Center to join us as a new partner in
this activity in the spring of 2001. The Drought Monitor was highlighted in the report of the National
Drought Policy Commission (NDPC) to Congress and the President in May 2000, and the NDPC
recommended continued and expanded support for this partnership effort. (The NDPC report can be
found at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/drought/finalreport/accesstoreports.htm.)</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: Spring 2001</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/98</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/98</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:56:49 PDT</pubDate>
<description>I recently participated in an advanced course, "Management Strategies to Mitigate Drought in the
Mediterranean: Monitoring, Risk Analysis, and Contingency Planning", in Rabat, Morocco (May 21-
26). The course was organized by the Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Zaragoza (CIHEAM-
IAMZ) and the Institut Agronomique et Veterinaire Hassan II in Rabat, Morocco, with contribution
from the European Commission. The National Drought Mitigation Center's Mark Svoboda also
participated. Other lecturers included M. Wassif (Desert Research Center, Cairo); Eddy dePauw
(ICARDA); Ana Iglesias (Universidad Politecnica, Madrid, and Center for Climate Systems Research,
Columbia University); Karl Monnik (Institute for Soil, Climate and Water/ARC, South
Africa); Manuel Menendez (CEDEX, Madrid, Spain); José Guerrero Ginel (Universidad de Córdoba,
Córboda, Spain); and Tayeb Ameziane, Omar Kerkat, and Mohammed Doukkali from IAVII,
Rabat, Morocco. About 30 persons from 11 countries within the region participated in the course. 
The goal of the course was to provide participants with methodologies and technical tools to
develop and implement comprehensive drought preparedness plans. The format for the course was a
series of lectures and a series of practicals focused on climatic indices and GIS techniques. The
specific objectives of the course were included in the Fall 2000 issue (Volume 12, No. 3) of
Drought Network News. I hope to include a more detailed summary of the course in a subsequent
issue of this newsletter.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: October 1998</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/97</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/97</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:52:36 PDT</pubDate>
<description>On July 16, 1998, President Clinton signed the National Drought Policy Act into law. This law creates
the National Drought Policy Commission (NDPC), which will examine current laws and programs and make
recommendations to the president and Congress on the needs for a national drought policy. The Farm Service
Agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture will serve as the chair for the Commission, which will comprise
16 members. In addition to the Secretary of Agriculture, other members of the Commission will include the
Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of the Army, Secretary of Commerce, Director of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Administrator of the Small Business Administration, two governors nominated by the
National Governors' Association, and two persons nominated by the National Association of Counties and the
United States Conference of Mayors. The Commission will also include six persons (nominated by the
Secretary of Agriculture, in coordination with the Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of the Army)
representing groups acutely affected by drought emergencies, such as the agricultural production community,
the credit community, rural and urban water associations, Native Americans, and fishing and environmental
interests. Numerous groups are currently requesting representation on the Commission.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: June 1998</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/96</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/96</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:52:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The 1997-98 El Niño event has certainly raised the public's level of awareness of the impact of climate
on society. Although the concern in the United States has focused more on mitigating the potential effects
of floods, not all regions of the country are dealing with water surplus situations. An emerging drought in
Montana and parts of some surrounding states has caught the attention of scientists and policy makers in
recent months. Worldwide, droughts in Central America, Mexico, Brazil, Hawaii, some Pacific island
nations, Indonesia, Australia, southern Africa, and elsewhere have attracted the attention of scientists,
policy makers, and the media. 
Now, as El Niño has lessened in intensity, the threat of La Niña is upon us. Concerns are increasing
that the drought in Mexico and parts of the southern United States may intensify and spread into
surrounding states in the Southwest. The National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC) is currently
working with the U.S./Mexico International Boundary Water Commission and the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation to organize an August training workshop on drought contingency planning to address shortand
long-term issues of drought in the border states region. This workshop will be similar to regional
workshops the NDMC organized in 1997-98. Since the last issue of Drought Network News, the NDMC
has conducted workshops in South Carolina for the Southeast region and in Kentucky for the Midwest and
Northeast regions. In additional to the usual mix of participants from local, state, and federal agencies
attending these workshops, we have also had representatives from Taiwan, Mexico, Hungary, Korea, and
Australia as participants.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: February 1998</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/95</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/95</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:48:37 PDT</pubDate>
<description>If it seems like considerable time has elapsed since you received the last issue of Drought Network News,
it is not just your imagination. After much discussion, we decided not to publish the newsletter in October 1997.
First, we had a limited number of submissions to include. Second, the task of editing the manuscript for a new
drought book was an overwhelming task that was involving much of my time and that of my publications
specialist, Deborah Wood. She is also responsible for Drought Network News. With more submissions and the
near completion of the drought book, I am pleased to be publishing this issue of the newsletter.
The National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC) organized and conducted two training workshops on
drought contingency planning in 1997. These workshops were very successful, with more than 200 participants
representing a diverse background of tribal, local, state, federal, and regional organizations and agencies.
Three more workshops are planned for this spring. An article about the workshops is included in this issue (p.
3).
The National Drought Policy Act continues to be discussed in the U.S. Congress. The Senate version of
the bill (S222) passed last November. An identical version of the bill was introduced in the House of Representatives
(HR3035) in November. I testified in support of the bill at a hearing in late January. Although some
minor modifications may be made in the bill, it is expected to pass the House. This bill would establish a
commission to review existing drought programs at the federal, state, and local level and make recommendations
to the Congress and the president on the elements of a national drought policy. The commission would
have 18 months to complete its task. The NDMC will work closely with the commission.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>From the Director: June 1997</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/94</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/94</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:48:36 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought policy continues to be a topic of much discussion in the United States. On June 12, the Western
Drought Coordination Council (WDCC) met for the first time and adopted a work plan for 1997-98. The
WDCC is committed to improving drought management in the western states through mitigation and
preparedness. It is hoped that this Council, representing a partnership between federal, state, local, and tribal
government, will serve as a model for other drought-prone regions of the United States. Four working groups
(preparedness and mitigation; monitoring, assessment, and prediction; response; and communications)
established by the Council will meet in late July to assign priority to action items identified by the Council as
important to the WDCC's mission. The administrative leadership for the WDCC is housed at the National
Drought Mitigation Center.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Creating a Network of Regional Drought Preparedness Networks: A Call for Action</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/93</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/93</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:43:56 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought is a creeping, slow-onset natural hazard that is a normal part of climate for virtually all
regions of the world; it results in serious economic, social, and environmental impacts. Its onset and
end are often difficult to determine, as is its severity. Drought affects more people than any other
natural hazard. Lessons from developed and developing countries demonstrate that drought results in
significant impacts, regardless of level of development, although the character of these impacts will
differ profoundly. At the Meeting on Opportunities for Sustainable Investment in Rainfed Areas of
West Asia and North Africa (WANA), held in June 2001 in Rabat, Morocco, participants (including
ministerial delegations of 13 countries of the WANA region) concluded that the primary keys to
development of drylands in the region were reducing rural poverty, arresting natural resource
degradation, accelerating economic growth, diversifying economic opportunities, and enhancing
food security. The recurrence of persistent drought was identified as one of the obstacles to achieving
these aims. The economic, social, and environmental challenges of drought in developed countries
are also significant. Recent droughts in the United States, Canada, and Australia, for example, have
resulted in serious impacts in the agriculture, transportation, and energy sectors and also serious
water use conflicts and environmental impacts. 
The impacts of drought, like those of other natural hazards, can be reduced through mitigation
and preparedness. Drought preparedness should be an integral part of water resources management.
Drought risk is a product of a region's or community's exposure to the natural hazard and its
vulnerability to extended periods of water shortage. If nations, regions, and communities are to make
progress in reducing the serious consequences of drought, they must improve their understanding of
the hazard and the factors that influence vulnerability. The hazard or natural event is best characterized
by the frequency of meteorological drought at different levels of intensity and duration, and this
frequency is projected to increase for some regions in the future as a result of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. It 
critical for drought-prone regions to better understand
the drought climatology of their region and
establish comprehensive and integrated early warning
systems that incorporate climate, soil, and water
supply factors such as precipitation, temperature,
soil moisture, snow pack, reservoir and lake
levels, groundwater levels, and stream flow. An
integrated early warning system can provide timely
and reliable information to decision makers from
farm to national level to aid in reducing the impacts
of drought.</description>

<author>Donald A. Wilhite</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Australia&apos;s National Drought Policy Continues to Evolve</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/92</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/92</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:40:46 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Australia is an arid continent with a high variability
in its annual rainfall. Given the frequency and
severity of droughts and the consequent high financial
and social costs to the nation and to individuals,
and the associated potential for further degradation of
the land, a national policy on drought was clearly
needed. 
Australia's National Drought Policy (NDP) was
ratified by the state and Commonwealth (federal)
governments in 1992 (White, 1993; White et al.,
1993; White and O'Meagher, 1995). Its aims are to:
 encourage primary producers and other sections of
rural Australia to adopt self-reliant approaches to
managing for climatic variability;
 maintain and protect Australia's agricultural and
environmental resource base during periods of extreme
climate stress; and
 ensure early recovery of agricultural and rural industries,
consistent with long-term sustainable levels.
Further detail on policy evolution in both Australia
and South Africa is described by O'Meagher, et al.
(1998b).</description>

<author>David H. White</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Coping with Exceptional Droughts in Australia</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/91</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/91</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:40:44 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The objectives of Australia's National Drought Policy (NDP), agreed to
by Commonwealth (national), state, and territory ministers in 1992, are to:
 encourage primary producers and other sections of rural Australia to adopt
self-reliant approaches to managing the risks stemming from climatic
variability;
 maintain and protect Australia's agricultural and environmental resource
base during periods of extreme climate stress; and
 ensure early recovery of agricultural and rural industries consistent with
long-term sustainable levels.
Under the NDP, Australian farmers are expected to assume greater
responsibility for managing the risks arising from climatic variability. This
requires integrating financial and business management with production and
resource management to ensure that the financial and physical resources of
farm businesses are used efficiently. Details of the NDP and its implementation
are described in previous issues of Drought Network News (White, 1992
and 1993; White et al., 1993a).
Since the signing of the National Drought Policy Statement in 1992, the
states and territories have moved to implement the range of measures spelled
out in the NDP (White, 1993) by:
 implementing the National Property Management Planning Campaign,
with emphasis on education in effective risk management, sustainable
agriculture, and drought preparedness;
 phasing out transaction-based subsidies, particularly freight subsidies for
the transport of fodder, water, and livestock provided by state and territory
governments;
 providing financial assistance through the Rural Adjustment Scheme
(RAS) to farmers exposed to exceptional drought circumstances; and 
 undertaking drought-related research and development, with emphasis on
drought prediction, monitoring, and management.</description>

<author>David H. White</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought Vulnerability of Rainfed Crops in Semiarid Tropics in India: New Methods of Determining Rainfall Variability</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/90</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/90</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:35:25 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In dryland areas of India, rainfall is the main source of water for raising
crops. For these areas, the greatest problem is not water shortage per se, but
rather the tremendous variability in rainfall from year to year and season to
season. In planning for the coming season, we currently have little or no
ability to predict the date of the onset of rains or their amount, distribution,
or duration. However, uncertainty about rainfall is lessened when information
is available concerning the possible variability and frequencies of
historical occurrences of rainfall. This information can be obtained by
coupling water use to water production functions that enable estimates of
associated crop yields and economic returns (Stewart and Hagan, 1973; and
Doorenbos and Kassam, 1979). Therefore, in the present study, a simple
water balance model developed by Frere and Popov (1979) was used to
estimate crop water use; when coupled with water production functions, it
explains yield behavior of the following crops (with respect to different dates
of commencement of the rainy season): sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.
Moench), pearl millet (Pinnisatum americanum L. Leek), sunflower
(Helianthus annus L.), castor (Ricinus communis L.), and pigeon pea (Cajanus
cajan L. Millisp.) These crops are grown in Hyderabad under high management
and rainfed conditions.</description>

<author>U. S. Victor</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>El Niño&apos;s Effect on Southwest Monsoon Rainfall in Andhra Pradesh, India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/89</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/89</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:32:18 PDT</pubDate>
<description>India is primarily an agricultural country, despite making rapid strides in
industrialization in recent decades. The Indian economy is therefore highly
dependent on the behavior of the summer monsoon, also known as the
southwest monsoon, which occurs during four months (June-September).
This accounts for 75% of the annual rainfall over most parts of the country
and also generates great demand for rainfall forecasts in different time scales.
For nearly a century, Indian meteorologists have been attempting to develop
suitable techniques that could be used for preparing long-range forecasts of
monsoon rains over India. Walker (1923) has done pioneering work in this
field and has introduced the concept of correlation as a measure of interrelationship
between preceding events anywhere in the world and subsequent
monsoon rainfall over India. Since then, considerable efforts have been made
to predict the behavior of monsoons by employing teleconnection signals
depicted by the various features of general circulation. During the last seven
years, the India Meteorological Department has been issuing forecasts on an
all-India basis, accurately using a power regression model based on 16
regional and global parameters, including El Niño (Gowariker et al., 1991).
However, these forecasts have seldom been used for precise agricultural
planning in any one specific region of the country. The obvious drawback is
the uncertainty about the reliability of an all-India forecast for a given
meteorological subdivision. Ramana Rao et al. (1994) examined the validity
of forecasts for the country as a whole in agricultural planning and management
over different meteorological subdivisions. They have also examined
the validity of long-range forecasts at the district level in the state of Andhra
Pradesh, in southeast India. In this study, we have attempted to examine the
behavior of monsoon rainfall in space and time in relation to the El Niño event
at the district level in Andhra Pradesh during the years with long-range
forecasts of both deficit and normal rainfall on an all-India basis.</description>

<author>U. S. Victor</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Severe Droughts Becoming Recurrent, More Persistent in Mexico</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/88</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/88</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:28:51 PDT</pubDate>
<description>During recent years, severe and extreme droughts
in Mexico and their consequent water deficits have
become more recurrent and persistent, according to
historic records and the experiences of those who
have lived through these events. 
In Mexico, agriculture consumes more than 85%
of the available water. When the available water is
insufficient to satisfy agricultural requirements, impacts
can be acute. In extreme cases, lack of water
has caused severe economic, social, and environmental
crises, and recovery from these crises has
taken much time and money.
The regions that are most affected by drought
have some common characteristics: they are the most
vulnerable regions, they are more productive than
other regions, and they have a greater demand for
water than other regions do. The north, northwest,
and northeast regions, in which are located the most
important irrigation zones and most of the industrial
plants, constitute 70% of the country, but these regions
receive less than 40% of the country's total
rainfall. The southeast region, constituting 30% of
the country, receives 60% or more of the total rain;
in this part of the country, the rivers are larger with
regular flows, and there are wide humid zones where
irrigation is unnecessary. (Figure 1 shows the main
hydrogeographic regions of Mexico.) The few remaining
nonirrigated areas, which benefit from summer
rains, have also been drastically affected by
drought, because they do not have alternate sources
of viable water or fast response capabilities.</description>

<author>Israel Velasco</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Localized Severe Drought during 1996 and Its Impact on Crop Production in Raipur District of Central India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/87</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/87</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:25:51 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In Raipur district, the onset of the monsoon
occurred in the 25th standard meteorological week
(June 18-24). But after the onset of monsoonal rains,
there was a lull in the monsoon for about 2 consecutive
weeks. In the 28th week (July 9-15), the district
received 77.6 mm of rainfall. This was equal to the
normal value for that week. In the following (29th)
week, the district received 96.8 mm rainfall, 38.9%
more than the normal rainfall for that week. 
Thus, the rice, soybean, and other crops sown
with the onset of the monsoon in the 25th week
suffered from acute water shortage during the 26th
and 27th weeks (June 25-July 8), and the germination
of these crops was affected. Those farmers who
had resown their crop received good rainfall during
the 28th and 29th weeks (July 9-22). In the 32nd
week, there was a total rainfall of 258.4 mm at
Labhandi, Raipur, compared to the weekly normal of
77.1 mm. However, out of this, 222.0 mm of rainfall
was received in only one day--July 31/August 1,
1996. Because the rice seedlings were very small at
that stage, most farmers drained the water out of their
fields.</description>

<author>J. S. Urkurkar</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Recent Advances in Seasonal Forecasting in Southern Africa</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/86</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/86</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:25:49 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Climatic uncertainty posed by the looming possibility of unprecedented
climatic change is presenting society with new challenges the world over. In
recent years, demand for long-range seasonal to interannual climate forecasts
has been on the rise as society grapples with climatic risk management
in southern Africa. Although more investment is still required to bring
weather services in the region to a level advanced enough to handle the
emerging complex and economically justified user needs for climatic services
and products, some commendable progress has already been made,
particularly in providing seasonal forecasts in addition to the other traditional
core services and products provided by weather centers. 
The regional Drought Monitoring Centre for southern Africa based in
Harare has put in place operational regional seasonal rainfall forecasting
schemes that are largely driven by the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
phenomenon, the Indian and Atlantic SST, and the regional pressure and
wind anomaly fields at various levels. Matarira and Unganai (1994) produced
an operational regional ENSO signal interpretation scheme that has
been quite successful at predicting the 1994-95 drought and the nature of the
1995-96 rainy season in southern Africa. This empirical seasonal forecasting
scheme uses an analogue approach and univariate linear regression
models and is complemented by subjective interpretation of other regional
scale factors such as the general tendency in pressure and wind anomaly
fields. Figures 1a and 1b show the analogue scheme, which relies mainly on
the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), as applied to the 1994-95 and 1995-
96 rainy season forecasts, respectively. 
Recent advances in seasonal forecasting work include the identification
of a strong teleconnection between southern African and Ethiopian rainfall
at a time lag of up to 4 months. The influence of the Quasi-Biennial
Oscillation (QBO) on the region's rainfall has been remodeled, with early
results showing that areas in the region that respond significantly to the QBO
phase shift are localized. Northern Zambia, northern Malawi, and Tanzania
rainfall showed the strongest response to the QBO. This latest research was
carried out at DMC-Harare by L. Unganai (DMC-Harare), S. Nyambe
(Zambia Met. Services) and J. L. Nkhokwe (Malawi Met. Services) while
Nyambe and Nkhokwe were visiting scientists at the Centre from October
1995 to May 1996.</description>

<author>Leonard S. Uganai</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought and Southern Africa: A Note from the Harare Regional Drought Monitoring Centre</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/85</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/85</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:21:10 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought is a normal part of southern Africa's climate and one of the most
important natural disasters in southern Africa. In fact, it is becoming
increasingly unusual for drought not to occur somewhere in southern Africa
each year. The dependence of most southern African economies on rainfed
agriculture emphasizes the importance of drought early warning products for
short- and long-term decision making in various sectors of the national
economies of the region. Following the 1991-92 drought, which ravaged
more than 80% of southern Africa, many in southern Africa now realize the
value of meteorological information in weather-sensitive decisions. Requests
for advanced drought information have come to the drought monitoring
center from a wide spectrum of users, including farmer groups, donor
agencies, finance houses, politicians, economists, the media, and hydrologists.
Information has been requested for precipitation predictions for periods
ranging from ten days, to seasons (in the case of farmer organizations), to as
long as four to five years (in the case of agricultural financing institutions).
The creation of a regional drought monitoring center (DMC) in Harare,
Zimbabwe, in 1989 (the DMC opened in 1991) was long overdue, according
to some farmers' representatives, nongovernmental organizations, universities,
government departments, and other regional and international organizations.
Many of these organizations have called for the enhancement of the
DMC, including increases in manpower, more computer hardware and
software, and applications-oriented research to enable the center to develop
into a regional center of excellence in applied meteorology and to act as a
regional climatological data archive and backup facility. 
Will all this awareness and support that the DMC has enjoyed live through
nondrought years? Laing (1994) cautions about the possibility of apathy after
a few years of good rains. Wilhite (1992) has also given similar warnings;
these warnings need to be taken seriously by all those who have supported
drought monitoring institutions in the past.</description>

<author>Leonard S. Uganai</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Meteorological Drought in Turkey: A Historical Perspective, 1930-&#150;93</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/84</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/84</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:21:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The climate of Turkey, which is mainly characterized by the Mediterranean
macro climate, results from the seasonal alternation of frontal depressions
with polar air masses and subtropical high pressures with subsiding
maritime tropical and continental tropical air masses. Continental tropical
airstreams from the northern African and Arabian deserts particularly dominate
throughout the summer, by causing long-lasting warm (hot) and dry
conditions over Turkey (except the Black Sea region and northeastern
Anatolia). Turkey has an area of 779,452 km2 and an average elevation of
1,132 m. 
This study outlines some spatial and temporal characteristics of Turkey's
rainfall, particularly in terms of drought and rainfall variability for the period
1930-93. Mean characteristics of the rainfall data were investigated for 99
stations, and then variations of Turkey's 91-station normalized rainfall series
and spatial distribution of the normalized rainfall index were analyzed.
Average record length of these stations is about 60 years. Approximately 67%
of the countrywide annual rainfall occurs during the cold winter (40%) and
cool spring (26.6%), when the eastern Mediterranean basin, Balkans, and
Turkey are influenced by the frontal mid-latitude and Mediterranean depressions.
Contributions of autumn and summer rainfall are about 23% and 10%,
respectively, of the annual total. In area-averaged series for the Mediterranean
region, winter rainfall reaches its maximum value at about 53% of the
annual total, and summer rainfall declines to about 4% of the annual total. The
number of stations in each rainfall regime region is given in Table 1, and the
location of 99 stations is shown in Figure 1.</description>

<author>Murat Türkes</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Talking Imperative for Grieving Farmers, Others</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/83</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/83</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:17:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Farmers who are losing their livelihoods to the
drought shouldn't be surprised to feel depressed or
angry, and neither should people around them. After
all, these farmers are suffering a very real loss and
they are grieving. 
Farmers who lose a crop in many ways will react
as have people who have lost loved ones, said John
DeFrain, family and community development specialist
at the University of Nebraska here. That is, they go
into shock, denial and anger, and not necessarily in
that order. 
The loss of a crop means a loss of time, expenses,
identity and, in some cases, a family tradition,
DeFrain said. The worst nine-month drought in the
state's history meant spring crops were planted in
soils six to eight inches short of moisture. While there
was sufficient moisture to get most of those crops up,
without additional moisture by mid-June, dryland
crops likely will burn up. Eastern and central and
southwest Nebraska are affected the most, with the
southeast being hardest hit. The drought is expected
to continue for the rest of the year.</description>

<author>Cheryl Alberts</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Summer Drought Ravages Crops in Middle China</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/82</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/82</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:14:17 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought affected China's agricultural production in spring, summer, and
fall 1994. The summer drought was very severe in the middle part of China,
especially in Anhui and Jiansu provinces.</description>

<author>Huajie Tai</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Improving Drought Management and Planning through Better Monitoring in Africa</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/81</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/81</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:11:32 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought is part of the environment. It occurs in
every part of the globe and adversely affects the lives
of a large number of people, causing considerable
damage to economies, the environment, and property.
It also affects countries differently, having a
greater impact on countries with poor economic
conditions. 
Recurrent drought in Africa in the last 30 years
has had a disastrous effect on an economic and social
situation that already had serious problems. Today, in
the aftermath of these devastating droughts, planning
and preparedness have become more important. Most
disasters, including droughts, are no accident. They
are made by misgovernment. However, competent
governments, given foresight and funds, can build
defenses against these natural disasters. 
The enormous physical consequences of drought
and the huge financial cost of relief efforts (compared
to prevention) have led Africa to improve its drought
management and preparedness scheme regularly.</description>

<author>Tsegaye Tadesse</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>An Introduction to the Drought Monitor</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/80</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/80</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:08:36 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The idea of better monitoring and assessing drought
has been a quest of NDMC director Don Wilhite for
more than two decades. He has been an advocate of
better climate monitoring, particularly drought monitoring,
because drought is a normal, recurring hazard
in virtually all of the United States. The challenge is
to recognize drought, a slow-onset or "creeping"
natural disaster, before a region is in the middle of
one. 
The most recent surge in interest in drought arose
during the 1995-96 drought in the Southwest and
southern Great Plains states. At the NDMC we
discussed how we could do a better job of tracking
and assessing the severity of droughts. One question
we often hear is "How does this drought compare, or
rank, to other droughts or the drought of record for
this region or state?" Or "Just how strong or severe is
this drought?" These are complicated questions to
tackle. We have to take into account spatial extent,
intensity, duration, and impacts on people and the
affected environment. That discussion is for another
time.</description>

<author>Mark Svoboda</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Effects of Water Stress on Soybean Productivity in Central India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/79</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/79</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:06:01 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In the Chhattisgarh plains in the agroclimatic region of central India
(Figure 1), farms may be characterized by one of the following: unbunded
lathyritic soils, bunded rice fields (rainfed), bunded rice fields (irrigated),
unbunded black soils, or rice bunds. Under these five farming situations,
different crop sequences have been in vogue. New crops and crop sequences
are recommended by the Agricultural University from time to time based on
experimental results. 
In the unbunded black soils, farmers usually plant small millets and
pigeon pea. However, based on experimental results, the University has
recommended soybean followed by chickpea crop sequence under rainfed
conditions during monsoon and post-monsoon (winter) seasons, respectively.
In the two to three years since that recommendation, the area under
soybeans has increased from 3,000 ha to more than 70,000 ha. Experimental results have shown that the evapotranspiration (ET) rate of the soybean crop
during peak vegetative and reproductive stages is very high, ranging between
5 mm and 6 mm per day. In view of this, soybeans have been recommended
only for heavy soils. Even in black soils with high retention capacity, water
stress conditions do occur during dry spells in the monsoon season. After the
withdrawal of monsoon rains in September, soybeans sometimes face acute
water shortage during the end of reproductive and maturity stages.</description>

<author>Ajay K. Srivastava</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Persistent Drought in 1993 Affects Bulgarian Agriculture</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/78</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/78</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:02:02 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The drought of 1992 persisted through the winter of 1993 (see Drought
Network News, Vol. 5, No. 2 [June 1993]:12-15). Figure 1 shows the monthly
values of national rainfall in 1993 and their normal averages. National rainfall
was 28% and 63%, respectively, of the mean during January and February
1993. During March, rainfall was about normal, but drought conditions
persisted because of the rainfall deficit from the summer of 1992. Water
supplies increased until 20 April 1993, but after this date, drought conditions
returned. At the end of April, the soil moisture in the 0-20 cm layer was 10-
25 mm, which is insufficient for normal emergence and growth of spring
crops. The development of winter crops was also delayed. In some areas of
the country, the available soil moisture in the top 1 mm was only 60-71% of
the available capacity in April.</description>

<author>Nikola Slavov</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Hydrometeorological Considerations for Rainwater Management during Drought Years in Peninsular India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/77</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/77</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:54:05 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Peninsular India is located in the tropics; its climate ranges from arid
conditions in the rain shadow region (under the influence of Eastern Ghats
along the east coast and Western Ghats along the west coast) to humid
conditions in regions adjoining the west coast. The average annual rainfall
in the region varies from about 500 mm in the interior parts to more than
3000 mm on the crest of Western Ghats. The rainy season commences
during the month of June because of the onset of the southwest monsoon
near the tip of peninsular India. The southwest monsoon ends during
September. The rainy season continues up to the end of November because
of the northeast monsoon in the southeastern parts of peninsular India. Crop
production under rainfed conditions in the arid and semiarid regions is often
affected by droughts during the monsoon season because of prolonged dry
spells associated with break monsoon conditions. Sometimes, heavy rainfall
occurs even in the drier regions because of severe cyclonic activity in
the Bay of Bengal. Rainwater management is crucial for improving
productivity, particularly during the years of drought. Therefore the daily
rainfall data of two typical locations representing both arid and semiarid
climates were analyzed to evolve the basis for rainwater management to
improve crop production in drylands.</description>

<author>J. B. Singh</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Long-Range Forecasts of Southwest Monsoon Rainfall Explored for India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/76</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/76</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:49:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Southwest monsoon rainfall (received during June-September) determines
the fate of millions of dryland farmers as well as the status of national
food security in India almost every year. The need for information about
southwest monsoon rainfall is great in these areas. An accurate long-range
forecast can help farmers increase agricultural productivity in good rainfall
years and negate the sudden downturns in agricultural production during
anticipated drought years by giving farmers sufficient time to adopt drought-resistant
crop varieties and appropriate crop, soil, and water management
practices. The India Meteorological Department is now able to make all-India
long-range forecasts of southwest monsoon rainfall accurately using a power
regression model based on 16 regional and global parameters from 1988 on.
However, these forecasts have seldom been used for strategic planning and
management of agricultural production in any of the regions of the country,
because the degree to which the all-India forecast is likely to hold true at
microlevel is not known. The reliability of the forecast needs to be established
at microlevel in order to make effective use of the long-range predictions for
agricultural planning and management in rainfed areas. Therefore, an attempt
has been made to examine the validity of the long-range forecast issued for
the country as a whole for agricultural planning and management at the Jhansi
and West Uttar Pradesh Plains meteorological subdivisions. 
The present investigation is based on seasonal (June to September)
rainfall data for the years 1958-92 at the West Uttar Pradesh Plains meteorological
subdivision (subdivision no. 11). The seasonal rainfall data for the
same period for Jhansi have also been considered to examine the extent to
which the long-range forecast was relevant at microlevel.</description>

<author>J. B. Singh</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Severe Drought in Italy: Characteristics, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/75</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/75</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:45:51 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Following the severe drought event that occurred in Italy in 1988-90, the
Italian Department of Civil Protection published a report, Drought in Italy
1988-90 (in Italian; edited by G. Rossi and G. Margaritora), containing a
comprehensive description of the drought event, its impacts, and the mitigation
measures adopted in the most affected regions. 
Since the beginning of the drought, the Department promoted and
coordinated a number of initiatives, aiming mainly to mitigate domestic and
agricultural water shortages. The Department also formed a drought committee,
which included representatives of various government agencies (in
charge of hydrometeorological data collection and water supply system
management), with the aim of acquiring timely information on the evolution
of the drought in different parts of the country and suggesting adequate
actions. The book presents the results of the activities coordinated by the
Committee--namely, the description of the meteorological and hydrological
characteristics of the 1988-90 drought, the main impacts of the drought on
municipal and irrigation systems, and the assessment of measures implemented
at the national and local levels. The following summary of the book
provides a picture of the most severe drought experienced in Italy in the last
fifty years and some information on recent initiatives and laws at the national
level to reduce the risk of water shortage during future drought events.
A study of the meteorological trends in the 1988-90 period, prepared by
the Italian Air Force Meteorological Service, shows that the position of the
500 hPa isobaric surface over the Mediterranean basin during the drought
period was significantly higher than the reference average values. The
presence of persistent anticyclones during the entire decade (1980-90)
became especially critical between September 1988 and March 1989 and
between September 1989 and March 1990, leading to precipitation lower than
long-term average values for all of Italy.</description>

<author>Giuseppe Rossi</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>NDMC Conducting Regional Drought Planning Workshops</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/74</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/74</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:41:43 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The National Drought Mitigation Center is conducting a series of regional workshops, "Planning
for the Next Drought," around the country in 1997 and 1998. The first workshop was in Albuquerque,
New Mexico, July 28-30. Plans are underway to conduct similar workshops in other regions. A second
workshop will probably be held in Salt Lake City in late 1997, followed by workshops in the Southeast
and Midwest in 1998. Because the workshops are sponsored by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, there
is no registration fee.</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Changing Climatic Scenarios and Strategies for Drought Management in the Indian Arid Region</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/73</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/73</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:38:42 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Western Rajasthan constitutes
62% of the 0.32 million km2 that
make up the hot Indian arid region
(Figure 1). The average annual rainfall
of the area varies from less than
100 mm (coefficient of variation [CV]
= 70%) in the western parts to just
above 500 mm (CV = 40%) in the
eastern parts of arid Rajasthan. During
July and August, the eastern parts
of the arid region have an assured
crop growing period of 12-15 weeks,
whereas the western parts mostly depend
on the vagaries of the southwest
monsoon. The annual potential evapotranspiration
rates are 3-8 times higher
than the annual rainfall, resulting in
extreme water deficits and aridity conditions
in the region (Figure 2). Pearl
millet, which is a principal cereal crop
of the arid region, needs about 90
days for its maturity, and any weather aberrations
after sowing result in considerable reduction in crop
yields. Agricultural droughts have been found to
occur in the region in 25%-48% of the years during
1901 to 1995, with a frequency and intensity varying
from one location to another, severely affecting
food and fodder production.</description>

<author>A. S. Rao</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Rainfall Patterns for India&apos;s Karnataka State Show Above-Normal Precipitation for 1994-98</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/72</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/72</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:34:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The Karnataka state, confined roughly within 11.5° N and 18.5° N
latitude and 74° E and 78.5° E longitude, is situated on a table land at the point
where the western and eastern Ghat range enclose the Nilgiri hill complex. It
is enclosed by chains of mountains to its west, east, and south. The state
consists mainly of plateau, with a higher elevation of 600 to 900 m amsl in
small portions of the extreme north and northwest Karnataka and the whole
of the southern half, an elevation of 300 to 600 m amsl in the north, and an
elevation of less than 300 m amsl in the narrow coastal belt of the state (see
map above). Using Koppen's climatic classification, the state is classified
into three main parts, coastal Karnataka (CK), north interior Karnataka
(NIK), and south interior Karnataka (SIK).</description>

<author>M. B. Rajegowda</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>The Drought in Chile and La Niña</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/71</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/71</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:30:53 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Precipitation is one of the climatic elements most
affected by the presence of La Niña in Chile. An
important precipitation deficit begins during La Niña
events, from latitude 45°S to the north. This deficit
prevails most of the year, with winter (April-September)
being most vulnerable to these anomalies.
The central region of Chile (30°S to 40°S) has
negative anomalies, with precipitation values 35% to
100% below the climatologic annual average. These
rain deficiencies in Chile are determined by the persistence
of anomalies of anticyclonal circulation of
middle and subtropical latititudes and an area of
anomalies of cyclonic circulation in the sub-polar
latitudes, from a north-south dipole of positive and
negative anomalies of geopotential height in the mid
troposphere. In Chile, La Niña usually produces air
temperatures lower than normal, with deviations
ranging from 0°C to -1°C. The social and economic
impacts of La Niña events in Chile are serious.
Agriculture, cattle and timber industries, energy, and
industrial sectors are the most affected.</description>

<author>Juan Quintana</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Quarterly Report Provides Assessment of Western Water Supply Indicators</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/70</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/70</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:28:32 PDT</pubDate>
<description>A new quarterly report, Western Climate and
Water Status, provides decision makers in the western
United States with a comprehensive assessment
of water supply indicators that can give early warning
of emerging droughts. A product of the Western
Drought Coordination Council, the report is an important
new connection between scientists and policy
makers.</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Planning for the Next Drought: A National Drought Mitigation Center Workshop Sponsored by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the National Governors&apos; Association</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/69</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/69</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:26:14 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The drought that gripped the Southwest and southern
Great Plains states in 1996 was the most recent
reminder of the nation's continuing and apparently
increasing vulnerability to drought. Although drought
is a common feature in the West, it is a normal part of
the climate of each region of the United States: drought
struck the Southeast in 1986; most of the country,
especially the Midwest and Plains states, in 1988-89;
the West from 1987 to 1992; and the Northeast in
1995. Experiences from each of these droughts reinforce
the need for advance planning. Even though
drought is a slow-onset disaster, it is difficult to respond
quickly and effectively to reduce the effects of
drought unless a contingency plan is already in place.
Citizens and stakeholders benefit from the coordinated
efforts of local, state, federal, and tribal governments
and agencies. 
The National Drought Mitigation Center is organizing
a series of workshops, each in a different region
of the country, on how to prepare for drought.
Workshops in Albuquerque and Salt Lake City were
held in July and November 1997, respectively, and
additional workshops are now planned for the Southeast,
Midwest and Northeast, and Great Plains regions.
Workshop participants will learn how to develop
a drought plan. Participants will also have the opportunity
to discuss their specific planning needs with
experts and learn how others coped with recent
droughts.</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Exploring the Potential for Using ENSO Forecasts in the U.S. Corn Belt</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/68</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/68</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:20:37 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Interannual climate variability poses the greatest risk that farmers face.
Until recently, seasonal climate forecasts have been weak and therefore rarely
observed by farmers in making management decisions. Farm management is
generally based on long-term mean expectations of climate and crop responses
to local edaphic conditions. Currently, significant progress is being
made in the skill level of predictions of seasonal to interannual climate,
primarily because of new understanding of the teleconnections between
ocean circulation and atmospheric processes. The El Niño/Southern Oscillation
(ENSO) refers to fluctuations in both sea-surface temperatures (SSTs) in
the eastern equatorial Pacific and in sea-level pressures in the southern Pacific
at a time scale of roughly 3 to 7 years. Using ocean circulation models, we are
now able to forecast the SST anomaly up to a year in advance with an 80%
level of accuracy (Latif et al., 1994). Thus, associated climate phenomena
may be predicted with a high degree of skill using this tool. 
Given the strong relationship between crop growth and climate, this
predictability carries significant implications for improved efficiency of
agricultural production (Adams et al., 1995; Sonka et al., 1986). In some
regions, the teleconnection between climate and ENSO has been well
established. In others, however, the relationship is only now being elucidated.
Thus, the spatial extent of the potential for use of ENSO forecasts is not well
defined. We are developing a methodology that uses analysis of historical
climate and crop data as well as models of crop growth and farm management
to explore the extent of ENSO impacts and implications for using forecasts
in agricultural management.
Based on the few studies that have been done, there is indication of a
significant link between ENSO and climate in the midwestern United States.
Using reconstruction from white oak tree rings in Iowa going back to 1640,
Cleveland and Duvick (1992) showed a strong correlation with the Southern
Oscillation Index, one indicator of the ENSO phase. Handler (1984) used
yield data from the major Corn Belt states going back to 1868 and a
classification scheme ranking event intensity. He found a strong relationship,
with El Niño years associated with positive maize yield anomalies and La
Niña with negative anomalies. Our current work extends the analysis of the
U.S. Corn Belt, with the objective of testing the potential for using long-range
ENSO/climate forecasts to increase profit margins and decrease risk for
maize farmers in the United States.</description>

<author>Jennifer G. Phillips</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Droughts over Homogeneous Regions of India: 1871&#150;-1990</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/67</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/67</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:16:21 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The summer monsoon (June through September), or southwest seasonal
rains, contribute 78% of India's annual rainfall. It is the greatest climatic
water resource of India. The country's agriculture and food production
depend on these rains. Rainfed farming areas in India account for about 70%
of the total arable land in the country, with nearly 100 million ha depending
on the monsoon rains. The rains also contribute to power generation and
industrial production.</description>

<author>B. Parathasarathy</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought Preparedness and Management Training Seminar Conducted for West Africa</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/66</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/66</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:13:03 PDT</pubDate>
<description>All of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) member countries
of western Africa were represented at a seminar conducted in Banjul, The
Gambia, 4-9 September 1995. The Training Seminar on Drought Preparedness
and Management for Western Africa was conducted to improve awareness
of drought and appropriate mitigation and preparedness technologies to
reduce impacts. The seminar was organized by WMO and sponsored by
WMO and the UN Sudano-Sahelian Office.</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>ENSO&apos;s Impact on the Occurrence of Autumnal Drought in Iran</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/65</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/65</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:10:49 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Recent extreme rainfall events and the frequent
occurrence of worldwide droughts and their associated
natural disasters (i.e., devastating bushfires in
Australia, Indonesia, and Italy during 1997; the current
severe drought in Iran) have increased the scientific
community's interest in the broad characteristics
of rainfall variation and the potential for rainfall
prediction. 
On the basis of the Koppen climate classification
(Ahrens, 1998), the Islamic Republic of Iran (Figure
1) is categorized as generally having arid (BW) and
semiarid (BS) climates. This signifies that the annual
precipitation is less than the potential annual loss of
water through evapotranspiration. The occurrence of
rainfall is unreliable and deviations from the mean are
generally more than 40%. The average annual precipitation
over the country is estimated to be about
250 mm (about one-third of global annual precipitation). 
Iran, with an area of 1,648,000 km2, lies predominantly
within a portion of the Alpine-Himalayan
chains, including the major mountain systems of the
Alborz and Zagros ranges (Figure 2). As indicated in
this figure, the central part of Iran, which is surrounded
by these ranges, comprises two uninhabited
deserts, Dasht-e Lut and Dasht-e Kavir. In spite of
severe dry conditions over these regions, the Zagros
and Alborz highlands, like the coastal strip of the
Caspian Sea, are classified as having a Mediterranean
climate (Csb) and usually receive moderate precipitation.</description>

<author>M. J. Nazemosadat</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Workshop on Drought-Related Issues in Fars Province, Iran: Critical Points and Resolutions</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/64</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/64</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:04:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>As a result of the occurrence of overwhelming
severe drought over most parts of the Islamic Republic
of Iran, an educational/professional workshop on
drought issues was held at the College of Agriculture,
Shiraz University in Iran, October 18-19, 2000. The
workshop was sponsored by the College of Agriculture,
the office of Fars Provincial Government, the
Agricultural Bank, and Shiraz Abfa Company. The
workshop was mainly focused on the assessment of
drought impacts and severity in Fars province, in the
southern part of Iran. 
The inauguration ceremony was attended by some
of the parliament members (from Fars province), the
Chancellor of Shiraz University and his deputies, the
construction deputy of Fars Government, the director
of the National Disaster Office (NDO), the NDO staff
in Fars Province, general managers from various departments
of the province, postgraduate students, and
about 400 professional staff from various disciplines.
All sessions, including the closing session, were well
attended by the participants.</description>

<author>M. J. Nazemosadat</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Winter Drought in Iran: Associations with ENSO</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/63</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/63</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:55:32 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The Islamic Republic of Iran (Figure 1) has an area of
1,648,000 km2 and a population of 65 million people
(1995 estimate). The country has arid and semiarid
climates and the occurrence of rainfall is unreliable,
with a coefficient of variation as high as 70%. The
average annual precipitation over the country is around
250 mm. Two mountain ridges, the Alborz and Zagros
(Figure 1), which run east and southeast from the
northwest corner of the country, play an influential role
in determining the amount and spatial distribution of
rainfall. The peaks of Alborz and Zagros are about
5,700 m and 4,000 m, respectively. 
Rainfall generally occurs from October to March
(winter), with extreme events during January and February.
Annual rainfall over the northern sides of the
Alborz range may reach 1,800 mm, but for the central
and eastern deserts, the yearly total is around 50 mm.
Droughts and floods are common, and the severity
and hardships of these natural disasters frequently hit
both rural and urban societies. Drought limits dryland
farming and affects the productivity of irrigated lands.
Moreover, due to massive overgrazing, large-scale
soil erosion occurs during dry spells. Atmospheric and
climatic incidents (i.e., floods, droughts, and lightning)
account for about 97% of all natural disaster costs.
Concern about water resources is currently realized
as one of the most important issues for most of the
Iranian scientific and management communities. Most
parts of the Islamic Republic of Iran recently experienced
an exceptional drought that lasted more than 2
years (1998-2000). In some areas, drought has also
extended into winter 2001. The 1998-2000 drought
inflicted $3.5 billion in damages, killing 800,000 head
of livestock and drying up major reservoirs and internal
lakes (Pagano et al., 2001). 
Nazemosadat and Cordery (2000a) and
Nazemosadat (1999) have recently revealed that the
autumn rainfall in Iran is negatively correlated with the
Southern Oscillation Index (SOI). The relationships
were found to be strong and consistent over the southern
foothills of the Alborz Mountains, northwestern
districts, and central areas. Since winter rainfall contributes
a major portion of Iranian water resources, the
shortage of rainfall during this season is the most important
cause of drought in Iran. Nazemosadat and Cordery
(2000b) have therefore focused on the impact of ENSO
on winter precipitation in Iran. The present study outlines
some key results of the aforementioned studies.</description>

<author>M. J. Nazemosadat</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Droughts in Tamil Nadu: A Qualitative and Quantitative Appraisal</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/62</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/62</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:52:29 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Tamil Nadu experiences recurrent droughts.
Tamil literature also indicates that famine-like conditions
prevailed during the Pandiyan Kingdom for
nearly 12 years. The state normally benefits from
northeast monsoon rainfall from October to December,
unlike other regions of India, which are dominated
by southwest monsoon rainfall. 
In general, four major parameters determine the
nature and extent of drought conditions in Tamil
Nadu: (1) rainfall, (2) ground water, (3) reservoir
levels, and (4) crop conditions. It is estimated that
nearly 50% of the districts in the state are drought-prone.
The state receives nearly 80% of its annual
rainfall during the northeast monsoon, whereas it
experienced below-normal rainfall in the southwest
monsoon for 30% of the years in the last 25 years.
During the southwest monsoon period, water demand
always exceeds rainfall, but the water deficit is
quite low in the northeast monsoon period. Hence,
due to severe water deficit, drought recurs during the
southwest monsoon and also in summer months in
Tamil Nadu.</description>

<author>K. K. Nathan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Characteristics of Drought in Kerala, India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/61</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/61</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:47:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Kerala state in India, which is the first area of the
country to experience the southwest monsoon, has a
moist and wet climate. Kerala is in the extreme
southwestern part of the Indian subcontinent; it borders
Karnataka state in the north, Tamil Nadu in the
east, and the Arabian Sea in the west (Figure 1). The
entire state is one of the 35 meteorological subdivisions
in India. 
Kerala's climate is tropical monsoon and tropical
savanna, according to Koppen's climatic classification
(Figure 1). The state normally experiences excessive
seasonal rainfall, with hot summers (except in the
extreme southern districts like Trivandrum, where
dry season and hot summer climate prevails). The
three main seasons of the state are the hot season
(March-May), southwest monsoon season (May-
September), and northeast monsoon season (October-
February).</description>

<author>K. K. Nathan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Moisture Deficit Index Evaluated for Dry Regions of India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/60</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/60</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:44:15 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In India, about 70% of the cultivable land is rainfed. This includes areas
where crops are rarely affected by drought and areas where crops experience
moisture stress and often fail. The regions with the latter characteristics are
often called dryland areas and the agriculture so practiced there is known as
dryland agriculture. About 35% of the total cultivable land belongs in this
category. To determine the magnitude of water deficiency in these regions,
the moisture deficit index (MDI) has been evaluated for dryland stations in
India. The MDI is usually determined on the basis of annual precipitation and
annual potential evapotranspiration, as adapted by Thornthwaite and Mather
in 1955. This does not reflect the true nature of MDI for the purpose of crop
production, although it does give information regarding the degree of aridity.
Since this index sometimes is used as a criterion for crop planning, it would
appear more appropriate for it to be based on precipitation and PET during
the crop growth period. In this article, the monthly MDI for dryland stations
in India based on normal data has been worked out. We have also discussed
its implications for crop production in relation to other meteorological
factors.</description>

<author>K. K. Nathan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>A Case Study of the Deficit Spell Index for India&apos;s Semiarid Delhi Region</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/59</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/59</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:37:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The Delhi region, the national capital region of
India, is locked in by adjoining states like Uttar
Pradesh and Haryana. Delhi has a characteristic
continental type of climate, with extreme dryness,
intensely hot summers, and dry cold winters. According
to climatologists, this region is classified as semiarid
tropical steppe. The monsoon rainfall is very
erratic during June-September, which is the kharif
crop-growing season. The monsoon breaks over the
Delhi region between the first and second week of
July and withdraws by the last week of September.
The average annual rainfall is about 712.5 mm, of
which 80% is contributed by the monsoon during
kharif season. 
With ever-increasing population in the Delhi
region every year, there is a scarcity of drinking
water, ground water levels are rapidly receding,
usable land area is rapidly decreasing, and little
agricultural activity is possible. Frequent droughts
add to the misery. The frequency of droughts in the
region is approximately 20-25%, with chronic drought
experienced during 1918-19 and 1938-39.</description>

<author>K. K. Nathan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Poor Water Resources and Drought in the Gujarat/Saurashtra Regions of India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/58</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/58</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:34:11 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Inadequate water resources pose a big threat to
the economy, human activities, and livelihood in
the Gujarat/Saurashtra regions of India. Scanty rainfall
with wide aberrations in its distribution has
made the situation worse, leading to chronic drought
in the state in 2001. With the exception of the
Narmada and Tapi rivers, there are hardly any water
resources to sustain agricultural production in
the region. The gradual disappearance of forest
cover in the state has further aggravated the drought
situation. This has led to large-scale erosion of the
topsoil, particularly near the riverside. There is apprehension
that the region will soon become an
"environmental refugee" zone. 
In addition, groundwater resources are overexploited
in the state, with the water table going
down nearly 4 m per year, particularly in the premonsoon
season. The state was once a lush green
carpet of groundnut and cotton crops, but mismanagement
of water resources at all levels has led to
the current drought problem in the Gujarat,
Saurashtra, and Kutch regions. Figure 1 depicts the
current drought-affected regions of the state. 
India has a record of 12 successive good monsoons,
with the 13th in the offing this year. But the
drought in the Gujarat and Saurashtra regions may
be due to the poor monsoon and winter rainfall last
year. The crisis was aggravated by overexploitation
and reckless use of groundwater. Out of 100 million
people affected by drought in India, 25 million
are from this region, spread over 17 districts of the
state, and 7 million cattle are also affected. There is
a 30% deficit of food grains in this region.</description>

<author>K. K. Nathan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Assessment of Recent Droughts in Tamil Nadu</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/57</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/57</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:31:09 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Tamil Nadu, a coastal state in south India, is prone to droughts. The
climate of the state ranges from dry subhumid to semiarid. The state has three
distinct rainfall climates: (1) advancing monsoon period (from June to
September), with strong southwest winds; (2) northeast monsoon (from
October to December), with dominant northeast winds; and (3) dry season
(from January to May). The normal annual rainfall of the state is about 945
mm. 
Tamil Nadu is classified into seven agroclimatic zones: northeast, northwest,
west, southern, high rainfall, high altitude hilly, and Cauvery Delta (the
most fertile agricultural zone). The Cauvery Delta zone, located in the humid
tropics, has a mean annual rainfall of 1,273 mm, with more than 60% of that
coming from the northeast monsoon. An analysis of summer monsoon
rainfall (June-September) for 1871-1991 shows that the state experienced
below-normal rainfall in 30% of these years. During the summer, the average
rainfall is 266 mm, but water demand is 663 mm. Hence it is a deficit season.
The northeast monsoon brings an average of 529 mm rainfall and demand is
relatively low--361 mm.</description>

<author>K. K. Nathan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought Profile: Haryana State in North India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/56</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/56</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:28:09 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Haryana state is considered the breadbasket of India, along with the
Punjab state. The effects of drought (and mitigation of those effects) are
therefore of considerable importance for the state. This article considers the
state's drought "profile" through a study of six drought years in Haryana. 
Haryana has a semiarid climate in the southwest and a Gangetic plain
environment in the rest of the state. About 50% of the state has a moisture
deficit. One of the reasons for adverse crop production in the state during
June-September is the early withdrawal or late onset of monsoon rains, which
contribute nearly 80% of the state's annual rainfall. The monsoon rain during
June-September ranges from 284 mm to 521 mm in the drier western and
southern plains and from 333 mm to 721 mm in the eastern districts of the
state. The normal value during the period is 601 mm. Figure 1 shows the
rainfall pattern during the kharif crop growing season (June-September) for
the period 1977 to 1989. Out of 15 years, about 6 drought years have been
identified: 1979, 1981, 1982, 1986, 1987, and 1989. The minimum deficit
was 193 mm (1982) and the maximum rainfall deficit was 437 mm (1987)
from the normal seasonal rainfall. Dependable precipitation at 75% level of
probability is also depicted in Figure 1. Out of 12 districts in the state, 4 are
drought-prone. The main problems with agricultural drought in this region
are erratic rainfall; poor soil fertility; and limited, poor-quality irrigation
water. Table 1 shows rainfall amounts and crops cultivated in the drought-prone
districts of Haryana. Invariably, bajra, jowar, and maize crops are
grown in the drought-prone districts in the monsoon season, whereas wheat,
barley, mustard, and gram are grown with irrigation during the winter season.
These winter-season crops are called rabi crops.</description>

<author>K. Kailasa Nathan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Persian Gulf Sea Surface Temperature as a Drought Diagnostic for Southern Iran</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/55</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/55</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:21:01 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The Persian Gulf and Oman Sea, situated over the
northwestern extremity of the tropical Indian Ocean,
make up the southern border of Iran (Figure 1).
During hot seasons, the sea surface temperatures
(SSTs) of these water bodies are high, and a huge
thermal trough system is usually dominant over the
region (Bitan and Sa'aroni, 1992). The summer SSTs
of the Persian Gulf are reported to be the highest in the
world (Gabler, 1977). 
About 30% of the total rain-bearing air masses
coming to the country originate in north Africa, the
Red Sea, and western Saudi Arabia (Khalili, 1992).
These air masses are known as the Sudan Current;
they are categorized as tropical maritime. They produce a significant portion of the total annual rainfall
over the southern parts of Iran. Figure 2 shows that the
general trajectory of the Sudan Current passes over
Saudi Arabia and enters Iran through the Persian
Gulf. The occurrence of some heavy winter rainfalls
in Shiraz, Fasa, Bushehr, and Bandar Lengeh (Figure
1) is attributed to the movement of the Sudan Current
toward Iran (Khalili, 1992).</description>

<author>M. Jafar Nasemosadat</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Workshop on Drought and Desertification: Report on the Workshop and Recommendations</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/54</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/54</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:16:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The Workshop on Drought and Desertification
was held in Israel from 26 to 30 May 1997. Forty-four
participants from Africa, Asia, and Europe took part
in the Workshop, which was sponsored by WMO.
Three foreign experts provided in-depth analysis on
drought and drought preparedness--Dr. O. Brunini
(Campinas, Brazil), Prof. S. Mei (CAAS, Beijing,
China), and Dr. D. Wilhite (University of Nebraska,
USA), in addition to the Israeli lecturers.
Presentations by lecturers and discussions were
conducted under the following four main headings:
1. Drought and Desertification Definitions. 
2. Drought Causes and Management Response. 
3. Drought Monitoring and Mitigation. 
4. Assessing Drought Impact and the Development
of a Rational Policy.</description>

<author>J. Lomas</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Low Temperature and Cold Drought Risks in Crop Production in Temperate Kashmir</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/53</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/53</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:12:17 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Temperature plays a vital role in life processes
and crop production. Physical and chemical processes
within plants are temperature dependent; these
processes in turn control biological reactions in crop
plants. Temperature also plays a significant role in
some aspects of crop physiological cycles: the diffusion
rate of gases and liquids changes with temperature;
the solubility of substances is temperature dependent;
rapid progress occurs as a result of temperature
increases; and the equilibrium and stability of
various systems and compounds (including enzymes)
is a function of temperature.
Air temperature at the screen level is one of the
most important variables affecting crop production in
temperate Kashmir. Most crop plants are injured or
killed by low night temperatures, especially those
plants that are growing rapidly or flowering. Low
temperature in combination with wet soil may result
in the accumulation of harmful products in plant cells
while low temperature coupled with water shortage
results in cold drought.</description>

<author>Badrul Hasan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>No Droughts over India Following Very Strong El Niño Episodes</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/52</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/52</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:07:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>One of the external factors responsible for the
interannual variability of Indian summer monsoon
rainfall (ISMR--June through September) is the El
Niño phenomenon. About half of the droughts over
India have been related to this phenomenon. Other
external factors, such as the Eurasian snow, also
affect the year-to-year variability of the ISMR. It is
believed that in such cases, the ISMR becomes locked
into its own internal dynamics.</description>

<author>R. H. Kripalani</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>India, Indonesia experiencing opposite effects from 1997 El Niño</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/51</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/51</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:33:06 PDT</pubDate>
<description>It is now well recognized that the El Niño/Southern
Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon is the single
most important cause of year-to-year climatic variability.
Several studies have documented that a majority
of the warm extremes (El Niño events) cause
below-normal rainfall over Indonesia, while cold
extremes (La Niña events) cause above-normal rainfall
over India. 
During the current ongoing El Niño episode, temperature
anomalies in the Niño 1+2, Niño 3, and Niño
3.4 regions have been the largest values observed in
the last 50 years. The pattern of anomalous tropical
convection with enhanced activity across the central
and eastern equatorial Pacific and suppressed convection
over the Indonesian and western Pacific has
prevailed since March 1997. This has resulted in
drought over Indonesia. Much of Indonesia is suffering
its worst drought in 50 years as a result of the
effects of the latest El Niño system on weather. However,
during this episode, the June-September Indian
monsoon rainfall (IMR) was normal--102% of the
long-term average. In fact, some regions experienced
severe floods. We propose a new hypothesis to explain
this.</description>

<author>R. H. Kripalani</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Heat Waves and Floods across Asia: Was El Niño, then La Niña the Cause?</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/50</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/50</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:29:49 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Unprecedented heat wave conditions occurred
during May-June 1998 across Asia. Unusually high
temperatures were recorded in western India, Pakistan,
eastern China, Japan, and Southeast Asia. Even
the United States, western Africa, eastern Canada,
and western Australia experienced the blistering heat
spell. 
Some reports blame people for the global warming.
The world is warming because of the burning of
fossil fuels and deforestation, resulting in an increase
in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The 1998 heat
wave prompted the United Nations Environment
Programme to issue an urgent warning and a wakeup
call to limit the emission of global warming
gases. The year 1998 may in fact be the hottest year
of this millennium.</description>

<author>R. H. Kripalani</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Using the SPI to Analyze Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Drought in Turkey</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/49</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/49</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:26:22 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought is a natural phenomenon that has significant
economic, social, and environmental impacts.
Drought differs from other natural hazards in
that its onset and end are difficult to determine. It
develops slowly, and its impacts may remain for
years after termination of the event. No single definition
of drought exists that applies to all circumstances,
but most definitions of drought are based on
an expression of deficiency of precipitation resulting
in water shortage for some activity related to use of
water (Wilhite and Glantz, 1985; Dracup et al.,
1980). Water resources planners usually rely on
quantitative indices to decide whether or not a drought
exists. Consequences of drought are usually defined
by the impacts that human use systems place on
water supply. Drought impacts are usually first apparent
in agriculture but gradually move to other
water-dependent sectors. Recovery time for water
stored in surface and subsurface systems can be
quite long under severe drought conditions. 
Risk of drought is still a major concern in parts
of Turkey where precipitation amounts are low and
extremely variable. The combination of rainfall deficiency
and other climatic factors, especially high
temperature, creates a serious risk of drought in the
central and southeastern parts of the country, where
agriculture is the main economic sector (Komuscu,
1998). The impacts of drought in the low and variable
rainfall regions of the country can be widespread,
affecting such diverse sectors as agriculture,
irrigation, and energy. In particular, the southeastern
Anatolian region, which is the host of the Southeastern
Anatolian Project (GAP), may face a serious
threat from persisting drought conditions. Moreover, the project includes large-scale irrigation, which
stimulates higher competition among the water-dependent
sectors.</description>

<author>Ali Umran Komuscu</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Implications of Climate Change for Soil Moisture Availability in Turkey&apos;s Southeastern Anatolia Project Region</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/48</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/48</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:24:27 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The Southeast Anatolia Development Project
(known as GAP) is a multifaceted development project
for agriculture and water resources within the Turkish
portions of the Euphrates and Tigris river basins.
Through this project, the vulnerability of the region to
drought has been investigated in both temporal and
spatial terms. On completion of the project, 28% of
the total water potential of Turkey will be brought
under control through facilities on the Euphrates and
Tigris rivers, which have a joint flow of more than 50
billion m3 (GAP Regional Development Administration,
1997). The GAP project aims to irrigate 8.5
million hectares of land in Southeast Anatolia, which
is 19% of the total economically irrigable lands in
Turkey. A project of such magnitude inevitably is of
major importance to the region's water resources and
agricultural potential. It is therefore important to
establish reasonable expectations of water use in the
GAP region, since agriculture is going to be a critical
component of the region's economy in coming decades.
The GAP area is located in the continental
Mediterranean rainfall region, and its annual precipitation
varies between 400 and 800 mm. Annual
precipitation decreases from north to south in the
region, and the greatest portion of the annual precipitation
falls in winter, December and January being the
wettest months. Summers in the region are very dry,
with high temperatures.</description>

<author>Ali Umran Komuscu</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>National Drought Mitigation Center Involved in Development of Natural Hazards Map</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/47</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/47</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:22:29 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC)
is involved in a project with several other agencies
and organizations in Canada, Mexico, and the United
States to develop a map of the major natural hazards
that threaten North America. Work on the project
began in February 1995. Since then, there have been
three working group meetings, with the most recent
meeting taking place in Guadalajara, Mexico, in
February 1997. Project leaders include Dr. Chris
Tucker (Emergency Preparedness Canada), Dr. Joe
Golden (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[NOAA]), Dr. Rosalind Helz (U.S. Geological
Society [USGS]), and Dr. Mario Ordaz-
Schroeder (Centro Nacional de Prevención de
Desastres [CENAPRED]--National Center for Disaster
Prevention).</description>

<author>Michael J. Hayes</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Climatic Uncertainties and Recent Experiences in Medium-Range Weather Forecasting Over Kashmir</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/46</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/46</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:19:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Successful crop management and production
require a precise and thorough understanding of
agroclimatic conditions of a region. A crop experiences
a range of weather conditions during its vegetative
and reproductive phases. Although the agronomic
inputs at optimum levels decide satisfactory
and stable crop yields, the range of weather and
climatic optimum prevalent at important crop stages
determine the ultimate yields. Thus, even with all
inputs at our disposal, we cannot afford to ignore
the environmental conditions experienced by the
crop. Systematic and continuous measurements of
weather elements provide basic data input for tuning
any type of computer-based forecasting system.
This data also forms the basis for characterizing the
climate of a region. We have, therefore, made an
attempt to characterize the weather pattern over
temperate Kashmir (India) based on location specific
data, further presenting results of forecast
analyses done at our level. The analysis is based on
medium-range weather forecasts received from the
National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting,
New Delhi.</description>

<author>Badrul Hasan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Agrometeorological Aspects of Crop Production in Temperate Kashmir</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/45</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/45</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:16:36 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In our recent article on forecasting uncertain
weather over temperate Kashmir (India) (Drought
Network News, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 12-14), we tried to
characterize the crop-growing environments by giving
long-term means of various agrometeorological
parameters (such as air temperature, relative humidity,
precipitation, and hours of bright sunshine). Forecast
analysis for changes in temperature and precipitation
events indicated an overall reliability of about
50%. Changes in minimum temperature could be
forecasted relatively more accurately than changes in
maximum temperature. Precipitation events were more
uncertain during summer (May to October), which
happens to be an important season from the standpoint
of crop production. 
The present article focuses on the variability of
Kashmir weather and its possible impact on summer
and winter crops of the region. Historical weather
data has been analyzed on a "weekly/monthly mean"
basis to depict the ranges between which they might
have fluctuated. The analysis is based on calculation
of standard deviations. Results of one such analysis
are depicted in Figure 1, which shows substantial
variability in all weather elements. With the exception
of one or two months, the parameters of precipitation
and weekly duration of sunshine are quite inconsistent.
A similar graph (Figure 2) has been prepared on
a weekly mean basis wherein the means of air temperature
(maximum and minimum) and weekly totals
of precipitation/sunshine hours are depicted. The
phenological stages of some important crops have
also been worked out.</description>

<author>Badrul Hasan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Rainfall Climatology of Jammu and Kashmir State, India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/44</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/44</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:14:52 PDT</pubDate>
<description>We have written a number of articles on various
aspects of weather characterization and forecast verification
under temperate environments of Jammu
and Kashmir (India). We have also touched on some
of the approaches that might help in solving climatically
triggered problems (Hasan and Kanth 1997).
Fortunately, we were lucky enough to make significant
progress in some (if not all) of the approaches.
The present article focuses on an analysis of rainfall/
precipitation in this state of the Indian Union under
different agroclimatic zones, with an update on forecast
verification analysis of temperate Kashmir (India)
during 1997-98. 
India is classified into agroclimatic zones or major
agro-ecological regions (Figures 1 and 2). By
definition, an agroclimatic zone is a land unit, in
terms of major climate and growing period, that is
climatically suitable for a certain range of crops and
cultivars (FAO, 1983). An ecological region is characterized
by distinct ecological responses to
macroclimate as expressed in vegetation and reflected
in soils, fauna, and aquatic systems. Several
attempts have been made to classify our land area
into climatic regions or zones, and these are well
documented (Sehgal et al., 1992). The important
point is the degree of recognition that has been given
to these various approaches and their use in promoting
the objectives of effective agriculture, macrolevel
land use planning, and effective transfer of
agrotechnology. Two approaches seem to meet these
objectives--the National Agricultural Research
Project (NARP) approach (Figure 1) and the recent
Agro-Ecological Region approach (Figure 2). In the
NARP approach, state universities were advised to
divide each zone/state into subzones; accordingly,
129 subzones were delineated for India, based primarily on rainfall, existing cropping patterns,
and administrative units. The
Jammu and Kashmir state was thus divided
into 4 zones (Figure 1). In the
agro-ecological region-based approach,
recognition was given to the climatic conditions,
length of growing period, land
form, and soils (Sehgal et al., 1992) (Figure
2). Thus India has been divided into
20 agro-ecoregions. The Jammu and
Kashmir state comprises 3 regions, as
depicted in Figure 2. The crop distribution
in the state is shown in Figure 3.</description>

<author>Badrul Hasan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Comparative Hydrometeorology of Temperate and Semiarid Environments in India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/43</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/43</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:11:56 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Out of a total cropped area of 178 m ha, India has
59 m ha of irrigated cropland. The remaining 119 m
ha is rainfed. Crop production under rainfed conditions
either occurs during the rainy season or depends
on conserved or residual soil moisture. In temperate
countries, the economy largely depends on production
of goods and services that are less affected by the
variabilities of weather. Although India receives adequate
amounts of rainfall annually through the four
different types of weather phenomena--southwest
monsoon (74%), northeast monsoon (3%), pre-monsoon
(13%), and post-monsoon (10%)--the distribution
in time and space is erratic, resulting in a limitation
on the length of crop-growing periods (LGP) or
the occurrence of floods. 
The temperate environment of Kashmir consists
mainly of two crop growing seasons extending from
May to October (summer) and November to April
(winter). Rice, maize, cowpea, and beans are some of
the important summer crops, while rapeseed, berseem,
oats, and wheat are grown as winter crops.
Under the semiarid conditions of Rajasthan, some drought-resistant crops like pearl millet, cowpea,
guar, and foxtail grass are cultivated during the summer
monsoon season (June to September), while the
ensuing winter season up to February experiences
various degrees of moisture stress. Crops grown in
this winter season are mostly irrigated. This season is
followed by a third one, with hot and dry weather
(February to June).</description>

<author>Badrul Hasan</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Droughts in Poland, 1951-90</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/42</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/42</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:09:10 PDT</pubDate>
<description>One of the negative features of Poland's climate
is the periodic occurrence of atmospheric droughts.
The most frequent source of this phenomenon is the
occurrence of long-term (sometimes lasting several
weeks) rainless periods. The occurrence of these periods
is connected with the persistence of a stationary
east European high that joins with the Azores anticyclone
via central Europe. In such situations, with the
accompanying lack or insufficiency of atmospheric
precipitation, a drought begins to develop gradually.
First, a soil drought appears, followed by hydrologic
drought. During a hydrologic drought, a decrease in
the ground water flow into surface waters is observed,
among other phenomena. This results in the reduction
of water flow in rivers. During such periods, a significant
drop in the level of underground waters, as well
as drying of some springs and small water courses, is
observed. 
In its initial phase of development, a drought exerts
its first negative effects on crops. Intensification
of this phenomenon also causes disturbances in other
sectors of the national economy. Droughts and their
negative results do not pose the same threat to all areas
of Poland, although in general the influence of
droughts is stronger here than in the majority of central
European countries. This situation is the result of
a combination of natural and historic factors. 
One of the areas of interest of the Institute of
Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW) is
continuous monitoring and assessment of the course
of meteorological and hydrological phenomena occurring
in all areas of Poland. When preparing an
analysis of the course of successive periods of drought
spells, specialists from the IMGW branch in Poznan
noticed the absence of similar studies of this phenomenon
in Polish literature. In an attempt to fill this gap,
they catalogued all droughts that occurred in Poland from 1951 to 1990. The research methods adopted in
this study, and also the general characteristics of
droughts in Poland, are summarized in this article.</description>

<author>R. Farat</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought Follows the Deluge in Vermont</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/41</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/41</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:05:26 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The incidence of both drought and flooding on
the Vermont landscape within the same calendar year
is not an uncommon occurrence. The year 1998 was
no exception, in that the ice storm of January and
statewide flooding of June/July finally gave way to
drought conditions as the year drew to a close. These
dry conditions continued into late June/early July 1999,
when a series of convective and frontal systems
brought steady rainfall amounts that were helpful in
reducing the surface moisture deficits. Hydrologic
deficits, however, still existed in mid-July. 
With the exception of the most severe events,
which can span entire years (e.g., 1961-69, 1980-81,
1988-89 and 1995), droughts in Vermont tend to be a summer phenomenon. When they occur during the
cooler time of the year (winter and spring), their
impacts, intensity, and other characteristics are somewhat
different from droughts that occur during the
warmer months. In a climate that is best described as
changeable, it is sometimes challenging to interpret
climate signals from one season to the next. The dry
conditions that have plagued the state since October
1998 have alternated with periods of above-average
precipitation receipt. As such, the intensity and occurrence
of drought among the state's three climatic
divisions (Northeastern = 1; Western = 2; and Southeastern
=3), as shown in Figure 1, have varied over
the period of interest. The quest for determining the
drought signal is even further complicated by the fact
that the monthly time scale may be inappropriate for
adequately describing the nature of dry conditions
across Vermont during the cooler time of the year.</description>

<author>Lesley-Ann Dupigny-Giroux</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Famine and Drought: The Question of Food Security in Zimbabwe</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/40</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/40</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:02:46 PDT</pubDate>
<description>From the time that the London Missionary
Society first took Zimbabwean
rainfall records at Hope Fountain in 1888, the worst
droughts on record are the consecutive dry spells
from 1911 to 1914, the 1946-47 drought, the 1960
drought, and the 1972-73 rainy season, which was
the driest period of colonial Zimbabwe. The country
also had serious food shortages in 1903, 1916,
1922, 1933, and 1942. Although the people of precolonial
Zimbabwe experienced recurrent droughts,
they generally had well-developed coping mechanisms
that prevented high death tolls (Iliffe, 1990).</description>

<author>Joshua Chigodora</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought in the United States: 1996 Summary and Historical Perspective</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/39</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/39</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:01:09 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Considerable variation in moisture conditions,
on both a spatial and temporal basis, occurred in the
contiguous United States during 1996. A tenth or
more of the country experienced severe to extreme
short-term (i.e., monthly) precipitation deficits during
nearly half of the months (Figure 1), but in many
months there were also large areas of excessive
precipitation, which resulted in overall national
conditions averaging near normal to wetter than
normal (again, see Figure 1). From a national perspective,
long-term drought peaked at mid-year
(Figure 2), when severe drought plagued the South
and Southwest.</description>

<author>William O. Brown</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Announcements: October 1998</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/38</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/38</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:58:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Contents:

IUGG-99 XXII General Assembly - Inter-Association Symposium on Geophysical Hazards: Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Warning
Systems

1999 National Disaster Medical System Conference

International Conference on Integrated Drought Management--Lessons for Sub-Saharan Africa

4th International Congress on Energy, Environment and Technological Innovation</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Announcements: August 1999</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/37</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/37</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:57:12 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Contents:

Disaster Management Workshops

National Workshop on Dynamic Crop Simulation Modeling

International Conference on Integrated Drought Management

15th Annual Conference on Contaminated Soils

2000 National Disaster Medical System Conference</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Announcements: June 1998</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/36</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/36</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:57:10 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Contents:
Western Drought Coordination
Council Products Available</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Announcements: June 1997</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/35</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/35</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:54:06 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Contents:

Regenerative Agriculture for the 21st Century

4th International Symposium on Environmental Geotechnology and
Global Sustainable Development - Call for Abstracts</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Announcements: February 1999</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/34</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/34</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:50:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Contents: 

International Symposium on High Altitude and Sensitive Ecological Environmental Geotechnology 

5th International Symposium on Environmental Geotechnology and Global Sustainable Development 

10th Global Warming International Conference &#38; Expo (GW10)

New Book</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Announcements: February 1997</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/33</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/33</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:48:15 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Contents:

Local Authorities Confronting Disasters and
Emergencies-Third International Conference

1997 National Conference on Delivering Health
and Medical Services in Catastrophic Disasters

Book: Policy Making in an Era of Global Environmental
Change</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Announcements: February 1998</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/32</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/32</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:45:13 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Contents:

Hazards and Sustainability: Contemporary Issues in Risk Management

Hazards-98: Seventh International Symposium on Natural and Man-made Hazards

Water: A Looming Crisis?
International Conference on World Water Resources at the Beginning of the 21st
Century

Disaster Forum '98

National Conference on Lifesaving Intervention

New Book:
Reaching the Unreached: Challenges for the 21st Century</description>


</item>


<item>
<title>Spring Crops in Bulgaria Damaged by 1996 Summer Drought</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/31</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/31</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:42:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Studies suggest there is a decreasing trend in precipitation
in both north and south Bulgaria because of
precipitation deficiencies in the 1940s and since the
1970s. Bulgaria has experienced several summer
drought episodes during the last century, most notably
in the 1940s and 1980s. There has been a decreasing
trend in precipitation during the potential crop-growing
season since the end of the 1970s, and the
number of 10-day dry spells during this season has
increased since the beginning of the 1970s. In the
course of the last 3 decades, there was a decreasing
trend in precipitation during the non-growing season
below a base of 5°-10°C. There was also a tendency
toward more precipitation deficit periods during the
actual growing season of spring crops (from sowing
to full maturity). 
A large deficiency in precipitation was observed
during the summer of 1992. The 1992 drought persisted
through 1993. In fact, from 1984 to 1993, the
country experienced more than 5 years of drought
conditions of various intensities, depending on location.
There is no doubt that climate in Bulgaria has
become drier in recent years.</description>

<author>Nikola Slavov</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>A Drought Watch System for Southeast Spain</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/30</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/30</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:37:37 PDT</pubDate>
<description>One of the main climatological characteristics of
the region of Murcia (11,300 km2), located almost
entirely in the Segura Basin (in southeast Spain), is
the great temporal and spatial irregularity of its precipitation.
Average annual precipitation values range
between 200 and 500 mm, and coefficients of variation
(CV) are high, with some values about 50%. It
is a semiarid region (including a small arid area), and
agriculture plays a major role in its economy. Because
of this, drought is one characteristic of the
region's climate that has far-reaching consequences,
from unemployment to social conflicts. 
It is important to define drought and identify
appropriate indicators for the region of Murcia as
part of a drought watch system. This system will
define the temporal and spatial limits of drought
conditions. It would help policy makers and government
officials establish policies for the provision of
aid to farmers and cattlemen, as in Australia (White
and O'Meagher, 1995). 
Because of the wide range of drought impacts,
there are many definitions of this phenomenon. However,
one characteristic seems common to all of
them: drought is caused by a deficiency in precipitation
for a fairly long period of time. For simplicity,
and keeping in mind that precipitation is, without
doubt, the most important variable in the process, the
watch system developed for the region of Murcia
uses only this variable at the moment, establishing a
comparison with a climatological reference (1961-
90) that we consider "normal."</description>

<author>Ramon Garrido Abenza</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>India&apos;s Arid Region and the Current Drought</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/29</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/29</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:17:57 PDT</pubDate>
<description>We recently surveyed some of the drought-affected
areas (Figure 1) in the Indian arid region in a
publication entitled "Strategy to Combat Drought and
Famine in the Indian Arid Zone." This article is a
summary of the report. 
The present drought in the arid and semiarid regions
of India is due to the cumulative effect of inadequate
rainfall during 1997-99. Twelve states in India
are in the grip of severe drought, with Rajasthan,
Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh
(Table 1) being the most affected. The Indian arid
zone encompasses 32 million ha and is highly prone to
droughts and famines. During the 20th century, the
region experienced agricultural drought an average of
once every two or three years (Table 2). 
Often droughts persist continuously for 3 to 6
years, such as the droughts of 1903-05, 1957-60,
1966-71, 1984-87, and 1997-99. When the monsoon
rains do not occur, the region is totally dependent
on buffer stocks for food and fodder to sustain
its 19.8 million people and 28 million livestock. Migration
in search of fodder, food, work, and water is
a common feature, causing hardships for desert
dwellers, livestock casualties, and famines during extreme
drought situations.</description>

<author>Pratap Narain</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Droughts and Dew Bean Productivity in Northwestern Arid Rajasthan, India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/28</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/28</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:14:13 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Arid ecosystems constitute an important part of the
world's dry climates. The Indian arid zone is characterized
by a harsh and fragile system, which influences the
productivity (both quantitative and qualitative) and socioeconomic
status of the inhabitants. The study discussed
in this article was conducted in the Bikaner
region, which is one of the most drought-prone districts
of Rajasthan (Figure 1). Annual rainfall in the district is
268 mm, of which 85% occurs during the southwest
summer monsoon (July-September). The region is
known to experience extreme variations in diurnal and
seasonal temperatures and high wind velocity, particularly
during summers, associated with high evaporative
atmospheric demands. Skies tend to be clear (cloud
free) in these regions throughout most of the year. Soils
of the Bikaner region are characteristically light and
sandy, with a high infiltration rate and &#60;100 mm field
capacity, and are prone to wind erosion. Cultivation of
crops is a challenging task under prevailing hostile
atmospheric situations and soil limitations.</description>

<author>Pratap Narain</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought Returns to the United Kingdom</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/27</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/27</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:11:23 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The privatization of the water industry in 1989 heralded a new era in water
management in England and Wales, but it also coincided with the beginning
of a period of volatile climatic patterns that have served to strongly underline
a continuing vulnerability to unusual weather patterns. Following the very
protracted drought that lasted until late 1992 in parts of eastern England, the
resilience of water supply arrangements in the United Kingdom was again
severely tested during a remarkably dry five-month spell beginning in the
early spring of 1995. The water resources outlook at the beginning of this
period was exceptionally healthy--reservoirs were at capacity and ground
water levels were close to seasonal maxima following the wettest 30-month
sequence in the entire British rainfall series, which extends back to 1869.
However, the subsequent transformation in hydrological conditions has few,
if any, modern parallels. For much of the spring and most of the summer, a
northward extension of the Azores high pressure cell served to deflect most
rain-bearing frontal systems and bring subtropical air masses across the
British Isles. Rainfall deficiencies built up quickly and a heat wave throughout
much of July and August produced a marked intensification in drought
conditions. August rainfall totals were less than 15% of average over wide
areas, and the mean temperature established the month as the second warmest
in the 337-year Central England Temperature series.</description>

<author>Terry Marsh</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought Monitoring and Advisory Services in South Africa</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/26</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/26</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:08:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The normal total rainfall for the summer rainfall areas in South Africa is
664 mm. Since 1963, the country has recorded 16 seasons below normal and
14 above normal. Since the 1982-83 season, 7 seasons have been below
normal and 4 have been above normal. Of these last 11 years, two rainy
seasons recorded less than 75% of normal rainfall, which is a coarse
estimation of severe drought. These seasons were 1982-83, when an average
total of only 408 mm was measured, and 1992-93, when the average total was
484 mm. Although 1991-92 has been called the worst drought this century,
for the stations used in this survey, the average total was 510 mm, or about
77% of normal. 
The 1981-82 and 1982-83 as well as 1991-92 and 1992-93 seasons were
close to being only 75% of normal rainfall. These are the only occasions in
the last 70 years that two consecutive summer rainy seasons have had such
seriously inadequate rainfall. Fortunately, the geographical and temporal
distribution of rainfall varies seasonally, and in 1992-93, adequate rain fell
on the main summer cropping areas of South Africa to save the country from
experiencing two disastrous crop failures. The greatest impacts of these two
very dry seasons were the low levels of surface water stored in dams on which
most industrial and urban areas depend and low ground water reserves for
boreholes, which support most irrigation and many rural communities. In
addition, the sugar industry in Natal and Zululand on the normally wet east
coast has been seriously damaged and many sugar mills have closed. Farming
and rural communities with accumulated capital losses and mounting debt
cannot hope to recover as quickly as the grazing grasses did following good
rains in October and November 1993.</description>

<author>M. V. Laing</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought Classifications and Crop Plans Developed for Tamilnadu</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/25</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/25</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:07:11 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought is defined as inadequate soil moisture to support crop growth and
normal yield. The degree of drought for a given location depends on the crop,
rainfall and its distribution, soil type, and various management practices.
Drought occurs frequently in Tamilnadu--some part of the state experiences
drought every year. 
The state of Tamilnadu is located in the southernmost tip of peninsular
India. It lies between 8°5&#34; and 13°35&#34; latitude north and 76°15&#34; and 80°20&#34;
longitude east, covering an area of 0.13 million km2 and including a long
coastline (about 1,000 km). The mean annual rainfall is 945 mm, with 45
rainy days. The state benefits from northeast monsoon rains (October-
December), unlike other parts of India, where southwest monsoons (June-
September) bring more rain. In Tamilnadu, 85% of the total area benefits
from the northeast monsoon; only 15% benefits from the southwest monsoon.
Potential evaporation always exceeds rainfall in most (8-10) months each
year. The severity of drought depends on the type of soil prevalent in a region.
It was once thought that farmers, through generations of experience, could
learn to live with the limitations of their local climatic conditions through trial
and error. That is no longer true. Modern agriculture requires precise
information on rainfall and on flood- and drought-prone areas. It is now clear
that to obtain maximum yields, a proper knowledge of agroclimatic conditions
is necessary to plan the most effective cropping system for different
areas. With this idea in mind, the state of Tamilnadu has been classified into
drought-prone areas, based on precipitation, potential evaporation, and soil
type, so that a suitable crop plan may be developed for each area.</description>

<author>R. Kulandaivelu</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Assessing the Impacts of El Niño and Non-El Niño-related Droughts over India</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/24</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/24</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:06:50 PDT</pubDate>
<description>It has now been recognized that the single most important key to the
earth's year-to-year climate variability is the El Niño/Southern Oscillation
(ENSO) phenomenon. El Niño episodes directly affect the climate of at least
half the planet and in many instances result in heavy loss of life and resources.
The global impacts of El Niño events have been summarized in a review
article by Bigg (1990), while the role of ENSO in Indian monsoon rainfall
variability is given in Krishna Kumar et al. (1995). During the ENSO warm/
cold extremes--i.e., El Niño/La Niña events--the majority of the episodes
induce below/above-normal rainfall over India. However, there have been
deficient monsoons over India apart from these El Niño episodes (Das, 1991).
Hence this article investigates the intensity of the droughts (i.e., deficient
monsoons) over India due to El Niño and non-El Niño forcings. Similarly, the
intensity of floods (ie., excess monsoons) is also examined with respect to the
La Niña/non-La Niña episodes.</description>

<author>R. H. Kripalani</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Potential Use of NOAA/AVHRR Satellite Data for Monitoring Environmental Change in Turkey</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/23</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/23</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:02:42 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In Turkey, desertification has been taking place in
areas of low rainfall and minimal vegetative cover. In
particular, the central, eastern, and southeastern parts
of the country are vulnerable to desertification because
of erosion, deforestation, and degradation of vegetative
cover. Rivers of those regions are characterized by
very high sediment yields. Nearly 60% of the country's
soils are subjected to severe erosion and approximately
450 million tons of sediment are carried to rivers
each year. Meanwhile, wind erosion has been a very
effective desertification process in central and southeastern
parts of the country, where annual rainfall varies
around 400-500 mm/year. Most central and southeastern
parts of Turkey are considered semiarid, and
some parts of the Central Anatolia region around Tuz
Lake exhibit arid conditions, with 300 mm/year rainfall. 
This study presents a potential use of remote sensing
for monitoring desertification with AVHRR-derived
NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index)
data. NOAA series operational meteorological satellites
provide data that can be used for various earth
observation applications, such as vegetation indexes,
sea surface temperatures, hydrologic applications, and
natural disasters. The Advanced Very High Resolution
Radiometer (AVHHR) is a multichannel scanning radiometer
carried by the NOAA Polar Orbiter satellite
series. It is a 5-channel radiometer, using a spinning
mirror to scan across 111 degrees for a ground swath
of 2,700 km, with an IFOV at a nadir of 1.1 km.
Because of the temporal characteristics of AVHHR, it
is possible to obtain valuable information for vegetation
monitoring studies and other environment-linked applications
(Gutman, 1991).</description>

<author>Ali Umran Komuscu</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>An Analysis of Recent Drought Conditions in Turkey in Relation to Circulation Patterns</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/22</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/22</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:01:10 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought commonly is perceived to be a prolonged
period with a significant reduction in precipitation.
Namias (1985) argues that drought is associated
with persistent or persistently recurring atmospheric
circulation patterns. For example, the
North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) has a major role
in controlling European climate and appears to exert
a strong influence in modulating North Atlantic
ecosystems. During the positive phases of NAO, the
North Atlantic westerlies, which provide much of
the atmospheric moisture to north Africa and Europe,
shift northward. This, in turn, results in drier
conditions over southern Europe, the Mediterranean
Sea, and northern Africa (Hurrell, 1995; Hurrell and
Van Loon, 1997). 
Turkey is situated in the Mediterranean
macroclimatic region of the subtropical zone. Because
of its complex topographic features and its
proximity to water, and because it is a transition zone
for different pressure systems and air masses originating
from polar and tropical zones, several climatic
subregions appear to be dominant over the
country. The amount and distribution of rainfall in
the coastal areas is determined by troughs and frontal-
type mid-latitude cyclones that are associated
with the prevailing upper-level westerly flows. The
Mediterranean Sea acts as a primary source for moist
air masses that produce high rainfall over the windward
slopes of the coastal mountain ranges. Frontal
Mediterranean cyclones associated with the southwesterly
air flows create favorable conditions for
heavy rainfall and thunderstorms in the southern and
western coastal parts of the country in late autumn
and early winter. Annual average rainfall in Turkey
is around 630 mm, with 67% of it occurring during
the winter and spring, when the eastern Mediterranean
basin and Balkans are influenced by eastward
propagating mid-latitude cyclones and Mediterranean
depressions (Türkes, 1996).</description>

<author>Ali Umran Komuscu</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Drought in the Lower Danube</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/21</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/21</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:56:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Bulgaria is situated on the Balkan Peninsula. Its northern frontier is the
lower part of the Danube. The Balkan range, with its zonal situation, is part
of a natural climatic frontier, dividing Bulgaria into two parts--north and
south.
One of the main features of the climate in the Danube Plain (northern
Bulgaria) is insufficient precipitation--a tendency toward dryness and frequent
droughts. The annual amount of precipitation is 500-600 mm. The highest
monthly values are measured in June (in some places in May), with 55-75
mm. February (in some places, March) is the driest month. Absence of
precipitation can occur in any month, but the probability of this happening in
May and June is very low. At the same time, monthly precipitation can exceed
100 mm in any month; in the summer it can even exceed 250-300 mm. The
radiation balance is about 50 Kkal.sm-2.
In this study, Budyko's dryness ratio (1985) is used to define land
moistening.</description>

<author>Ekaterina Koleva</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Results of a Rapid Appraisal Study: Agricultural Producers&apos; Perceptions of Drought Vulnerability and Mitigation--Howard County, Nebraska</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/20</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/20</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:53:24 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Drought is the leading natural disaster in the United
States in terms of monetary losses. The National Research
Council (1995) estimates that drought costs the
United States an average of $6-8 billion per year.
Because of these losses and the great effects of drought
on many citizens' quality of life, drought planning is
gaining widespread support in the United States. However,
U.S. drought planning within the agricultural sector
has historically focused on response measures that
help producers, primarily farmers, deal with and recover
from drought. It has been found that these often
ad-hoc drought responses are very expensive and do
little to reduce ongoing drought vulnerability (Wilhite,
1997). 
Subsequently, current national drought planning efforts,
as discussed in Preparing for Drought in the
21st Century (National Drought Policy Commission,
2000), have shifted to an emphasis on drought mitigation
programs--that is, modifying operations before a
drought strikes in order to reduce the impending negative
impacts. In terms of agricultural drought planning,
these programs necessitate increased communication
between agricultural producers, private businesses, and
government planners. 
Since its inception in 1995, the National Drought
Mitigation Center (NDMC) has striven to promote
drought mitigation planning and increase the communication
between federal, state, and local drought planners.
Essential in these endeavors is input from agricultural
producers that deal with drought at the "ground
level." Therefore, a study was undertaken to gain insight
into agricultural producers' perceptions of current
drought issues, which yielded valuable information on
several topics, including perceptions of drought vulnerability,
the use of climate forecast information, the
implementation of drought mitigation measures, and the
roles of external groups in drought planning.</description>

<author>Cody L. Knutson</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Changes in Drought Policies in New Zealand</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/19</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/19</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:48:59 PDT</pubDate>
<description>New Zealand, lying in the South Pacific Ocean approximately 1,200
miles east of Australia, is subject to recurring droughts. Its two main islands
are long and narrow, with high mountain ranges and hill country bisecting
them from north to south. The predominant westerly winds, along with the
mountain ranges and hill country, produce a marked orographic effect. Thus,
the western side of the country, in general, records significantly higher
annual average rainfall totals than does land on the eastern side. 
The country has experienced a number of severe droughts throughout its
history, especially in the east, where a number of extended periods of low
rainfall have severely affected pastoral agriculture (historically New Zealand's
major industry). Droughts that extend across autumn and/or spring are
generally the most severe in terms of their effects on grass production at
crucial stages of the growing season. Recent research on farmers' responses
to drought suggests that many farmers tend to "farm for droughts," by
ensuring that stock numbers are low throughout the summer months, which
are generally expected to be dry (Keen, 1995).</description>

<author>Heather J. Keen</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Revisiting the SPI: Clarifying the Process</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/18</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/18</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:46:43 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The number of applications using the Standardized
Precipitation Index (SPI) around the world continues
to increase (e.g., Agnew, pp. 6-12 of this
newsletter, and Komuscu 1999). However, there are
relatively few publications explaining the SPI, and
occasional misconceptions about the index have occurred.
When the SPI was first developed by McKee et
al. (1993, 1995), it was meant to address some of the
limitations that exist within the Palmer Drought Index
(PDI). These first publications were relatively simple
introductions of the SPI to the scientific community,
appearing in the Proceedings of the Eighth and Ninth
Applied Climatology Conferences, respectively,
sponsored by the American Meteorological Society.
In both cases, the authors define the SPI as the
"difference of precipitation from the mean...divided
by the standard deviation." It is this equation, given
by Komuscu (1999) and repeated by Agnew, that
causes confusion about the SPI.</description>

<author>Michael J. Hayes</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Conclusions and Recommendations from the Central and Eastern European Workshop on Drought Mitigation</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/17</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtnetnews/17</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:44:33 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The importance of prevention and planning in
drought mitigation was the impetus for the Central
and Eastern European Workshop on Drought Mitigation,
held April 12-15, 2000, in Budapest-Felso&#337;göd,
Hungary. The workshop was organized and sponsored
by several Hungarian agencies: the Ministry of
Agriculture and Rural Development; Ministry for Environment;
Ministry of Transport, Communication
and Water Management; Research and Development
Division of the Ministry of Education; and Hungarian
Meteorological Service. The United Nations Convention
to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Food
and Agriculture Organization (FAO), United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP), World Meteorological
Organization (WMO), European Commission
Joint Research Centre (EC JRC-ISPRA), European
Regional Working Group of the International Commission
on Irrigation and Drainage (ERWG ICID),
and the International Drought Information Center and
National Drought Mitigation Center at the University
of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA, also provided support. 
Seven country reports on the status of national
drought mitigation strategies in central and eastern
European (CEE) countries and twenty-one scientific
and technical papers were presented and discussed.
U.S. scientists discussed drought mitigation practices
used in the United States that might also be followed
in Europe. Although some steps have been taken in
several CEE countries toward the establishment of
national drought mitigation strategies, participants
noted that further efforts are necessary. Their recommendations
are republished below.</description>


</item>




</channel>
</rss>
