<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Papers in Entomology</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009 University of Nebraska - Lincoln All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers</link>
<description>Recent documents in Papers in Entomology</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:28:46 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>THE ORIGIN OF &lt;i&gt;CHUBUTOLITHES&lt;/i&gt; IHERING, ICHNOFOSSILS FROM THE EOCENE AND OLIGOCENE OF CHUBUT PROVINCE, ARGENTINA</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/137</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/137</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:07:39 PDT</pubDate>
<description>ABSTRACT-The distinctive trace fossil Chubutolithes gaimanensis n. ichnosp. occurs in Casamayoran (early Eocene) and Colhuehaupian (late Oligocene) alluvial rocks of the Sarmiento Formation in eastern Chubut Province, Argentina. Though known for nearly
70 years, its origin has remained obscure. Examination of new specimens and comparisons with modem analogs demonstrate that
specimens of Chubutolithes represent the fossil nests of a mud-dauber (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Virtually identical nests are
constructed today by mud-daubers in areas as disparate as southern Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, and Nebraska, confirming that
quite similar trace fossils can be produced by several different taxa in a higher taxonomic clade. No satisfactory ethological term
exists for trace fossils that, like Chubutolithes, were constructed by organisms above, rather than within, a substrate or medium.
The new term aedificichnia is proposed.
Chubutolithes occurs in alluvial paleosols and is associated with a large terrestrial ichnofauna. These trace fossils include the nests of scarab beetles, compound nests of social insects, and burrows of earthworms.</description>

<author>Thomas M. Bown</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>INVERTEBRATE LEBENSSPUREN OF HOLOCENE FLOODPLAINS: THEIR MORPHOLOGY, ORIGIN AND PALEOECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/136</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/136</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:01:07 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Although rocks of floodplain origin are volumetrically important, they contain relatively
few trace fossils; both abundance and diversity are low. Conversely, Holocene floodplain sediments locally contain abundant and diverse lebensspuren mostly produced by insects, spiders, nematodes, annelids and molluscs. At least 8 insect orders and 31 families include species that burrow in floodplain sediments and yet none of their lebensspuren are unique to this environment.
Taxonomically dissimilar insects produce morphologically similar lebensspuren, and the same species, or individual, may produce very dissimilar lebensspuren. Thus, identification of tracemakers for rocks of floodplain origin is as difficult as for marine rocks. Trace fossil form genera morphologically similar to Holocene floodplain lebensspuren include Skolithos, Cylindricum, Sabellarifex, Macanopsis,
Planolites, Palaeophycus, Sinusites, Cochlichnus, Amphorichnus and possibly also Scolicia;
many previous authors have regarded these as more typical of marine environments than of floodplains.</description>

<author>Brett C. Ratcliffe</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Disproportionate Relative Importance of a Terrestrial Beetle Family (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) as a Prey Source for Central Appalachian Brook Trout</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/135</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/135</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:42:03 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis and other
salmonids in Appalachia typically inhabit headwater watersheds,
where food resources may limit growth. We monitored
the feeding trends of a brook trout population in central
Appalachia over the course of 2 years to determine variation in
feeding intensity and important prey items. One terrestrial
beetle family, Scarabaeidae, provided a disproportionate
amount of energy during the only time of year when brook
trout were feeding substantially above maintenance ration.
Scarab beetles contributed 39.6% of all energy consumed
during May and June of both years, though the number of fish
with one or more scarabaeids present in the stomach varied by
month (22.2-51.7%). The species composition of scarab
beetles consumed suggested that four species are of particular
importance. Our findings imply that scarabaeids represent a
considerably important prey taxon for brook trout in the
region. Considering the foraging habits of the scarabaeid
species in question, the phenomenon we witnessed probably
occurs throughout Appalachia.</description>

<author>Ryan M. Utz</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>&lt;i&gt;Bothynus&lt;/i&gt; Hope, 1837 (Insecta, Coleoptera, SCARABAEIDAE): proposed conservation of usage by designation of &lt;i&gt;Scarabaeus ascanius &lt;/i&gt;Kirby, 1819 as the type species</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/134</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/134</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:37:09 PST</pubDate>
<description>The purpose of this application, under Article 70.3.2 of the Code, is to
conserve the current usage of the generic name Bothynus Hope, 1837 for well-known
scarab beetles of the family SCARABAEIDAE (subfamily DYNASTINAE) by designation of
Scarabaeus ascanius Kirby, 1819 as the type species. The type species of Bothynus
is at present Geotrupes cuniculus Fabricius, 1801, based on a misidentification. It
has long been recognized that the species involved in Hope's misidentification of
G. cuniculus is indeterminable. It is proposed that Scarabaeus ascanius Kirby, 18 19 is
designated as the type species.</description>

<author>Brett C. Ratcliffe</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Take a Beetle to Lunch Today or The Natural History of Dung Beetles</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/133</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/133</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:37:06 PST</pubDate>
<description>The appellation &#34;dung beetles&#34; refers to those scarab
beetles that are usually found with animal feces either
feeding on or depositing eggs in it. While this at first may
seem like an incredibly unsavory topic, the fact remains
that numerous creatures exist that feed on the waste products
of other animals. And, as it turns out, it's a good thing
they do. 
The Scarabaeidae, or scarabs, is one of the larger
families of beetles; it has 30,000 plus species worldwide
and approximately 15,000 species in North America. (See
my Museum Notes of March 1970.) The family is divided
into subfamilies (based on structural distinctions) such as
rhinoceros beetles, leaf chafers, dung beetles, and so on.
The subfamily Scarabaeinae is commonly referred to as
dung beetles, and it is about these marvelous animals that
I would like to give a much needed perspective.</description>

<author>Brett C. Ratcliffe</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>A Matter of Taste or The Natural History of Carrion Beetles</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/132</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/132</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:37:02 PST</pubDate>
<description>Beetles that eat writhing maggots and the decaying flesh
and putrefaction of dead animals . . . what could be more
macabre, repulsive, and in poor taste? [Well, possibly
beetles that eat feces and have a rolling good time doing it
(see my January Museum Notes).] Carrion beetles are an
important part of a vast host of scavengers that are responsible
for breaking down and recycling back into the
ecosystem the basic elements locked inside each one of us.
If it were not for these industrious scavenger beetles, we
might all be surrounded by the partially decayed and
mummified remains of wildlife and domestic livestock
that die each year. 
The decay process is an efficient and natural system
whereby the raw materials of dead organisms are returned
directly into the energy budgets of living organisms which
consume these raw materials or into the soil where the
decay occurs. Were it not for the life-giving nutrients
supplied by the bodies of dead animals, many beautiful
and interesting scavengers would no longer grace our
planet, and we would all be the poorer for it.</description>

<author>Brett C. Ratcliffe</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Color and Color-Pattern Mechanism of Tiger Beetles</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/131</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/131</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:53:46 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In 1903 the writer undertook a study of variation of the tiger
beetles. The work here presented is the outgrowth of this beginning,
and indeed includes some small portions regarding color patterns that
were written in that year. The work has been prolonged for many
reasons, but chief of these was the very large number of species in
the group and the fact that an adequate understanding of the material could not be attained without consulting many large collections. Further, the experimental results obtained in 1906 demanded a firsthand
study of the variations of the species concerned and their natural
habitats. The accumulation of material and data was not completed
until 1911. Some of this had to be studied, drawings made, etc.,
which with numerous other duties and enterprises under way made
necessary much time to put it into the present form.
A family with upwards of 1300 species of which more than 600
are in one genus and with characters which can be studied and
analyzed, appeared to afford material which was sufficiently promising
to justify delay. In the fourteen years that have elapsed since
the problem was first undertaken at the suggestion of Dr. C. B. Davenport,
the attention of biologists has shifted from variation, which
was then the chief topic of interest, to experimental modification of
characters, and finally to the methods of modern genetics. Various
men have made numerous suggestions regarding the work, but in its
final preparation the writer has been able to use only a few of them
in a general way, and an attempt is made to present the facts and
conclusions growing out of the material as simply as possible.

With Twenty-Nine Black and Three Colored Plates
Introduction 
Materials and methods 
Analysis of Color Patterns 
Color Patterns and Elytral Structures 
The Color Pattern Plan 
Color Pattern and Pigment Development 
Experimental Modification of Patterns 
Geographic Variation of Patterns 
Colors of Tiger Beetles 
Causes of Colors 
Ontogeny of Color 
Relation of Ontogenetic Stages to Geographic Races 
Geographic Variation in Color 
Experimental Modification of Color 
Relation of Colors and Color Patterns to Climate 
Geographic Center of the Group on the B'asis of Patterns 
General Discussion 
Pattern Tendencies 
Bearing of the Color Pattern Mechanism on Orthogenesis 
Bearing of the Pattern Mechanism on the Biogenetic Law 
Summary of Conclusions 
Patterns 
Color 
Geography 
Bibliography 
Explanation of Plates</description>

<author>Victor E. Shelford</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Observations on Possible Myrmecophily in &lt;i&gt;Stephanucha pilipennis&lt;/i&gt; Kraatz (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) in Western Nebraska</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/130</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/130</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:02:52 PST</pubDate>
<description>Little has been published on the life history of the five currently recognized species of Stephanucha
Burmeister. Skelley (1991) published the most thorough treatment to date for
S. thoracica Casey (recently synonymized with S. areata (F.) by Harpootlian 2001). Skelley
located larvae in the mounds of the pocket gopher, Geomys pinetus Rafnesque, in Florida and
was the first to describe an immature stage for the genus. Published accounts of Stephanucha
species biology are consistent with respect to spring emergence, presence in sandy habitats, and
a potential lack of adult feeding or liquid feeding (Lago et ul. 1979; Skelley 1991). Skelley
(1991) suggested that the main habitat of Stephanucha spp. might be pocket gopher mounds.
He noted sympatric distributions of Stephanucha spp. with pocket gophers, including S. pilipennis.
Kraatz found in the range of G. bursarius (Shaw). However, he noted that the larvae he
observed were nonspecific in habitat requirements, also utilizing mounds in sandy soil created
by other organisms or processes.</description>

<author>M. J. Paulsen</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>The use of live-bait traps for the study of sylvatic &lt;i&gt;Rhodnius&lt;/i&gt; populations (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in palm trees</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/129</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/129</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:02:43 PST</pubDate>
<description>Chagas disease is a major public health challenge for most Latin
American countries. An initiative for the coordinated
control of Chagas
disease transmission throughout the Andean countries was launched in
1997. Since the early 1990s, control measures based on elimination of
domestic/peridomestic triatomine colonies
and screening of donor blood
by serological testing have resulted in a reduction in incidence of ~70%
in the Southern Cone countries (WHO, 1991; Dias &#38; Schofield, 1999;
Moncayo, 1999; WHO/CTD, 2000).</description>

<author>F. Abad-Franch</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Larvae of Ceratocanthidae and Hybosoridae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea): study of morphology, phylogenetic analysis and evidence of paraphyly of Hybosoridae</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/128</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/128</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:45:20 PST</pubDate>
<description>Larvae of the scarabaeoid genera Germarostes Paulian, Cyphopisthes Gestro, Paulianostes Ballerio, Ceratocanthus
White, Pterorthochaetes Gestro, Madrasostes Paulian, Astaenomoechus Martínez &#38; Pereira (Ceratocanthidae)
and Hybosorus Macleay, Phaeochrous Castelnau, and Anaides Westwood (Hybosoridae) are described, keyed
and illustrated with fifty-seven drawings. A phylogenetic analysis of these two families based on larval morphology
is presented. Fifty-four larval morphological and three biological characters from twenty-seven taxa revealed nineteen
equally parsimonious cladograms. The monophyly of (Ceratocanthidae + Hybosoridae) is supported by four
unambiguous unique synapomorphies: dorsal medial endocarina on cranium extended anteriorly into frontal sclerite;
presence of large membranous spot on apical antennomere; labium dorsally with four pores in center (secondarily
reduced to two pores in some groups); and presence of stridulatory organ on fore- and middle legs (secondarily
reduced in some groups). Our analysis suggests that the family Hybosoridae is paraphyletic with respect to Ceratocanthidae.
The clade comprising the hybosorid genera Hybosorus and Phaeochrous is the sister group of the remaining
Hybosoridae plus Ceratocanthidae. It is supported by two unambiguous synapomorphies: two apical antennomeres
completely joined and the stridulatory organ represented by seven to nine large teeth anteriorly on the middle
leg. The hybosorid genus Anaides is a sister group to the remaining Hybosoridae plus Ceratocanthidae (without Hybosorus
and Phaeochrous) and the ceratocanthid genus Germarostes is a sister group to the remaining Hybosoridae
plus Ceratocanthidae (without Hybosorus, Phaeochrous and Anaides). The ceratocanthid genera Cyphopisthes, Astaenomoechus,
Paulianostes, Pterorthochaetes, and Madrasostes constitute a sister group to the hybosorid genus
Cryptogenius and are supported by the presence of two reversions: two dorsal pores on labium and completely reduced
stridulatory organs on fore- and middle legs.</description>

<author>Vasily V. Grebennikov</author>


</item>



</channel>
</rss>
