<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seventh Eastern Wildlife Damage Management Conference, 1995</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2007 University of Nebraska - Lincoln All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7</link>
<description>Recent documents in Seventh Eastern Wildlife Damage Management Conference, 1995</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 01:55:15 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	



<item>
<title>BLACKBIRDS AND STARLINGS KILLED AT WINTER ROOSTS FROM PA-14 APPLICATIONS, 1974-1992: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL POPULATION MANAGEMENT</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/29</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/29</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:03:27 PST</pubDate>
<description>The surfactant PA-14, registered with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1973 by the
federal Animal Damage Control (ADC) program, was used for 19 years (1974-1992) for lethal control of roosting
blackbirds (Icterinae) and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in the United States. In 1992, the ADC program withdrew
the registration of PA-14 because of costs required to provide additional EPA-requested data. There were 83 roosts
encompassing 178 ha treated with 33,300 L of PA-14 from 1974-1992. An estimated 38.2 million birds (48% common
grackles [Quiscalus quiscula], 30% European starlings, 13% red-winged blackbirds [Agelaius phoeniceus], and 9% brownheaded
cowbirds [Molothrus ater] were killed, an average of 2.0 million/year. The annual kill represented &#38;#8804; 1.3% of the
national winter population of blackbirds and starlings. We found no evidence using North American Breeding Bird Survey
(BBS) data that PA-14 applications caused declines in regional breeding populations. Furthermore, there was no evidence
of secondary poisoning or other adverse environmental effects from PA-14 applications. If regional population
management of blackbirds and starlings is to be implemented to reduce agricultural damage or conflicts with native
songbirds, new approaches, such as reproductive control, are needed because PA-14 alone will not be adequate. However,
PA-14 could have a role in such regional programs in addition to solving localized roost problems. PA-14 was a useful
management tool safely applied in human-populated areas (where most roost problems occur); its reregistration should be
considered as part of an integrated management program for blackbirds and starlings.
</description>

<author>Richard A. Dolbeer</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>BLACK BEAR DAMAGE MANAGEMENT IN WASHINGTON STATE</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/28</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/28</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:58:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>Black bears (Ursus americanus) foraging on trees can be extremely detrimental to the health and
economic value of a timber stand. A supplemental feeding program to reduce bear damage is coordinated by the
Washington Forest Protection Association's Animal Damage Control Program (ADCP). A brief overview of the
ADCP is provided along with a description of bear damage and the supplemental feeding program. Success of
the feeding program is demonstrated by an increasing participation and its general acceptance by the public.
Timber producers placed over 400 thousand pounds of pellets in 700 feeding stations this past year.
</description>

<author>Georg J. Ziegltrum</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>BLACK BEAR DAMAGE IN THE MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL VALLEY</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/27</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/27</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:54:58 PST</pubDate>
<description>We surveyed 62 hunting clubs in the batture of the Mississippi River in Arkansas and Mississippi to determine the extent
and severity of black bear (Ursus americanus) damage. Bear damage was more prevalent in Arkansas (70.6%) than in Mississippi
(11.8%). Damage to deer- stands was most common (43.8%), followed by damage to buildings (22.9%), getting in garbage (12.5%) and
damage to wildlife food plots (10.4%). Cost estimates of bear damage averaged approximately $40 per incident over the past 5 years.
Most (90.9%) clubs rated bear damage as either a slight nuisance or not important at this time, and half have taken no preventive
measures to reduce such damage. However, only 18.5% of clubs experiencing frequent damage favored increasing local bear
populations, whereas 66.7% of clubs with little or no damage were in favor of increasing local populations. Future management
strategies for black bears in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley should include effective public relations and education programs to help
minimize potentially negative public opinion of bears in the region.
</description>

<author>Thomas H. White Jr.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>CAN PREDATOR TRAPPING IMPROVE WATERFOWL RECRUITMENT IN THE PRAIRIE POTHOLE REGION?</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/26</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/26</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:51:31 PST</pubDate>
<description>We contrasted nest success for control areas and experimental areas in eastern North Dakota where we employed
professionals to trap mammalian nest predators from late March to late July. In 1995, dabbling ducks averaged 53% nest success on four
treatment blocks of 4,150 ha each; whereas on four control areas upland nesting ducks averaged 24% success. Diving duck nest success
averaged 57% on experimental areas and 29% on control areas. American coot (Fulica americana) nest success also improved on
experimental areas, but blackbird nesting and fledging success were not
affected by the treatment. In 1994, nest success of upland cresting ducks was 52%, which was a striking contrast with upland
nest success of 6% on the control area. In 1994 and 1995, brood counts were much higher on the experimental areas than
on the control areas. Track counts revealed lower estimates of predator activity on experimental sites compared to control
sites. This study provides the first strong experimental documentation that trapping, without the use of poisons, can
effectively reduce nest predation and substantially improve waterfowl recruitment.
</description>

<author>Frank C. Rohwer</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>EXTIRPATION OF A RECENTLY ESTABLISHED FERAL PIG POPULATION IN KANSAS</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/25</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/25</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:48:10 PST</pubDate>
<description>Most feral pigs (Sus scrofa) are descendants of domestic swine that have gone wild and their reproduction is
uncontrolled by man. A few populations may be descendants of European wild boar or crosses between wild boar and domestic
swine. Disease control officials report that 23 states have established populations of feral pigs and the total feral pig population
in the United States is probably in excess of 2 million animals. A population of feral pigs was documented in the fall of 1993 on
the Fort Riley Military Installation in northeastern Kansas. Biologists from the Fort Riley Natural Resources Division and the
Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit assessed the situation and recommended that the pig population be
eradicated because of the potential for disease, crop damage, erosion, competition for food with native wildlife and depredation
on native wildlife. The goal of this management plan is to eradicate feral pigs on Fort Riley. We have integrated a variety of
control techniques emphasizing the use of cage traps, snares, and possibly radio telemetry and aerial hunting.
</description>

<author>Chad D. Richardson</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF CATFISH PRODUCTION IN THE SOUTHEAST IN RELATION TO AVIAN PREDATION</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/24</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/24</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:44:19 PST</pubDate>
<description>Production of aquaculture species, especially catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in the Mississippi Delta, is a relatively
new and expanding industry. Catfish production represents the largest dollar value of the aquaculture industry, accounting for
approximately 50% of the entire industry. Mississippi is responsible for 82% of the total U.S. catfish production. Fish-eating
bird populations have capitalized on this new food source. Double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax sauritus), great blue
herons (Ardea herodias) , and great egrets (Casmerodius albus) are the primary predators on catfish. Cormorant caused losses in
excess of $2 million per year have been reported in Mississippi. U.S. Department of Agriculture research and operational
assistance programs have been established in the southeast to determine the economic impact that birds have on the
aquaculture industry, and to develop and implement technology that can be used in integrated strategies to solve bird predation.
</description>

<author>Donald F. Mott</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>CLOSING REMARKS: SEVENTH EASTERN WILDLIFE DAMAGE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/23</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/23</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:40:50 PST</pubDate>
<description>Initially, I want to begin these brief closing remarks
by expressing appreciation to Dean Stewart, Phil
Mastrangelo, Jim Armstrong, Greg Yarrow, other
members of the Program Committee, all of the
sponsors, exhibitors, contributors, speakers, and
session moderators, and to all of you as participants
who helped make this conference successful. As most
of you who have ever had the privilege of putting
together a conference such as this are well aware, there
are always a number of people that are key to the
success of the conference who work diligently behind
the scenes but are not always recognized. We want to
be sure to extend our appreciation to some of these
folks including: Judy Coats, Rachal Josey, Jennifer
Passons, and Dave Smith for their contributions.
Please join me in a round of applause to recognize all
of these folks who worked so hard and so long to
make this conference a great success. 
At the risk of sounding impartial, I want to
express our special appreciation to two groups, first to
Dr. Sam Polles, Executive Director, Randy Spencer
and Bill Thomason and all the personnel of the
Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and
Parks who supported, cooperated and attended the
conference. I expand this as well to all other State Fish
and Wildlife Agency participants. Professional
continuing education conferences such as this benefit
significantly from your participation and over the
year's, I have observed growing interest and
involvement by State Fish and Wildlife Agency,
administrators, biologists and enforcement personnel.
Please let us know how we can continue this
cooperative effort.
</description>

<author>James E. Miller</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>THE PROFESSIONAL EVOLUTION OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE MANAGEMENT</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/22</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/22</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:39:21 PST</pubDate>
<description>The terns -- wildlife damage management, in lieu of animal damage control, vertebrate pest control,
or nuisance animal control -- has become the currently recognized term for an area of wildlife management that a
growing number of professionals spend a significant part of their time and/or career working in. The acceptance of
this terminology is, however, a part of the continuing evolution of the profession and not simply a name change for
political correctness. Admittedly, my purpose is not to validate or beg acceptance of this terminology. Rather, what
I hope to do is to justify the underlying premise of the title, and applaud those (mostly unnamed) within our
profession who have contributed to this evolution I will close with some challenges that must be addressed to
ensure that the field of wildlife damage management continues to evolve.</description>

<author>James E. Miller</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>MISSISSIPPI&apos;S BEAVER CONTROL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, 1989-1994</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/21</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/21</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:37:40 PST</pubDate>
<description>Responding to landowner requests, the 1989 Mississippi Legislature created the Beaver Control Advisory Hoard and
mandated it to develop a program which would ensure the control of beaver damage throughout Mississippi. The Advisory Board is
comprised of the administrative heads of five state agencies: the Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks (chairperson), the
Department of Transportation, the Cooperative Extension Service, the Forestry Commission, and the Department of Agriculture and
Commerce. In cooperation with the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Animal Damage
Control (ADC) program, the Advisory Board developed the Beaver Control Assistance Program (BCAP). BCAP is designed to provide
assistance with the management of beaver damage on private, county, and state-owned lands and is funded through a combination of
federal, state, county, and landowner funds. Actual administrative authority of BCAP rests with the Department of Wildlife, Fisheries,
and Parks, however, the enabling state legislation allows the program administration to be transferred to a federal agency. As a result,
ADC administers BCAP under the guidance of the Advisory Board. Through a combination of technical assistance and direct control,
ADC works in cooperation with the BCAP Advisory Board to alleviate beaver-caused damages throughout Mississippi. County
enrollment in BCAP has gown from 22 participants in 1989 to 50 in 1994 and cooperative funding has increased by 44%. With
increasing beaver populations and predicted decreases in the commercial fur harvest, the demand for BCAP services is likely to increase.
</description>

<author>Philip Mastrangelo</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>WILDLIFE DAMAGE CONTROL IN KANSAS: PRIVATE OPERATORS AND PUBLIC AGENCIES</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/20</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/20</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:05:46 PST</pubDate>
<description>The private industry in wildlife damage control is expanding into territory predominantly occupied by public agencies in
the past. There is a potential for overlap and competition in services provided by the public and private sectors in Kansas. We examined
wildlife damage control activity reports from the Cooperative Extension Service (CES), Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks
(IDWP), and private nuisance wildlife control operators (NWCO) to determine the most common species controlled by each and their
overlap in services across Kansas. The CES predominantly controlled coyotes (Canis latrans). KDWP primarily controlled beavers
(Castor canadensis), deer (Odocoileus spp.), and raccoons. NWCO predominantly controlled squirrels (Sciurus spp.),
followed by beavers and raccoons. CES operated predominantly in rural and urban/rural mixed counties, while KDWP operated in
urban and urban/rural mixed counties, and NWCO operated primarily in urban counties. KDWP and NWCO overlapped extensively
within Kansas when managing beaver and raccoon damage complaints. We recommend more intensive research to determine the
extent of competition between KDWP and NWCO in wildlife damage control management in Kansas.
</description>

<author>L. Andrew Madison</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN WILD TURKEYS AND RACCOONS IN CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/19</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/19</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:59:53 PST</pubDate>
<description>Reduced trapping and hunting of predators has led to concerns that increased predator densities may aged game species
populations. Therefore, we investigated effects of predation on the wild turkey population on Tallahala Wildlife Management Area
(TWMA), Mississippi, from 1984-94. We also determined trends in raccoon trapping and hunter harvest in Mississippi. Predation of
nests (eggs), nesting hens, and points caused a population decline on TWMA. Most (88°!0) nest failures were caused by predation
from 1984-94; raccoons were the dominant predator. Declining raccoon hunter harvest from 1980-94 was correlated with declining
hunter effort. Trapping license sales and trapping harvest also declined. On TWMA, declining hunter effort was correlated with
declining raccoon harvest, reflecting the statewide trend.
Further reduction of predator harvest, particularly of raccoons, may negatively impact wild turkey populations in Mississippi. Future
research should investigate wild turkey/predator dynamics, effects of natural controls (e.g., disease) on predator densities, and possible
trapping incentives to reduce predator densities.
</description>

<author>Charles D. Lovell</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>BAT EXCLUSION METHODS</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/18</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/18</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:58:28 PST</pubDate>
<description>This publication is intended to serve as a review of currently accepted methods of bat exclusion.
Inappropriate house bat control methods are destructive to our decreasing bat populations and often cause additional
problems for the building's owner or occupant. These problems include odor from dead bats, infestations of
carrion-feeding flies, and increasing human and pet exposure to bats. Appropriate exclusion methods like winter
structure modification for cave hibernating bats or one-way excluders using hardware cloth, plastic sheeting, or plastic
bird netting are the best ways to protect these beneficial wildlife species and correct situations where humans and bats
come into conflict.
</description>

<author>William H. Kern Jr.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>FROM DEER PROBLEM TO PEOPLE SOLUTION: A CASE STUDY FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/17</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/17</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:57:10 PST</pubDate>
<description>Montgomery County, Maryland, a 495 square-mile area adjacent to Washington, D.C., is a rapidly developing, highly
educated suburban community with one of the highest per capita incomes in the nation. There is increasing concern for the growth and
impact of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations by agricultural interests, resource professionals and residential
landowners. The Montgomery County Council assembled a task force of stakeholders to examine relevant information and propose
deer management options. The task force report provided detailed information on the county deer situation, 11 management
alternatives, and 9 final recommendations. The county parks administrator appointed a staff member to develop a comprehensive
management plan to implement the task force recommendations. Public meetings were held to elicit the views of county residents on
the comprehensive management plan using a nominal group process. Implementation of recommendations that included direct herd
reduction methods met with favorable response except from animal rights activists. Managed hunts are planned for fall of 1996 while
education and improved information-collection efforts continue. The success of the process can be attributed to some key factors
including: (1) support of the county government by resolution that provided human, fiscal resources and political resolve; (2) support for
a solution by agriculturalists, residential owners and natural resource professionals; (3) an effective task force process with a diversity of
stakeholders; (4) an effective education and information program to counter dissemination of inaccurate information; and (5) a
structured public meeting process utilizing small-group discussions that allowed for the registration of values, opinions, and attitudes of
all stakeholders.
</description>

<author>Jonathan S. Kays</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>SURVEY OF BLACK BEAR DEPREDATION IN AGRICULTURE IN MASSACHUSETTS</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/16</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/16</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:54:53 PST</pubDate>
<description>Black bear (Ursus americanus) depredation in agriculture has become an increasing concern in Massachusetts. Complaints
from apiarists, corn growers, and livestock producers have increased 167% during the period 1980 to 1990, but whether this increase
truly represents more depredation, response of bears to other factors, or simply better reporting/record keeping has not been
determined. The bear population in Massachusetts from 1984 to 1989 increased 50°/a to approximately 700-750 animals statewide.
Subsequent estimates (1995) have placed the bear population around 1,200 animals. Concurrent encroachment of human development
into prime bear habitat also increased contact between bears and humans. During years when natural foods (primarily hard and soft
mast) are limited, bears search for alternate foods in nearby agricultural and suburban areas and may damage hives, crops, or livestock.
All these factors enhance the potential for conflicts that could jeopardize human-bear co-existence.
</description>

<author>Sandra A. Jonker</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>EFFICACY OF SHOOTING PERMITS FOR DEER DAMAGE ABATEMENT IN WISCONSIN</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/15</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/15</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:53:33 PST</pubDate>
<description>The efficacy of out-of-season shooting permits for deer damage abatement in Wisconsin has not been critically
evaluated. We used deer damage shooting permits to remove 21 antlerless deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from 7 heavily damaged alfalfa
fields to evaluate subsequent impact on crop damage. Volunteer shooters, using permits issued to the landowners, hunted a minimum
of 3 nights/week throughout the growth of the third alfalfa crop (Aug. 1 - late Sept.). We calculated the difference between the
assessed damage to the second crop (untreated) and the third crop (treated) on treatment and control farms. We found no significant
difference between treatment and control. There was no evidence that deer adjusted their feeding times to avoid shooting pressure.
There were no detectable relationships between the change in crop damage and field size or number of deer killed. This suggests that
shooting permits do little to reduce crop damage when used during the gnawing season. These results should assist managers involved
with, or contemplating, out-of-season deer damage abatement programs.
</description>

<author>Rick R. Norton</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>RODENT DAMAGE CONTROL IN NO-TILL CORN AND SOYBEAN PRODUCTION</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/14</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/14</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:51:24 PST</pubDate>
<description>In recent years the primary cause of reduced plant stands in no-till crops planted into heavy residue has been small eared
rodents called voles (Microtus spp.). Past research has indicated that severe stand reductions (80 to 100 percent) can occur if vole
populations in the field exceed 75 per hectare (30 per acre) at planting time. This vole population should be considered intense. If field
scouting about 30 days prior to planting reveals at least 12 active vole colonies per hectare (five per acre) an intense population can
develop, and damage control measures should be planned. Of all the legal techniques currently available for vole damage control in
no-till, utilizing a combination of &#34;habitat modification&#34; techniques may be the most effective, lowest cost, easiest to complete, and
safest on the environment. Second in all of these categories would be use of pre-emergence herbicides and broadcast alternative food
such as corn or soybean.
</description>

<author>Ron Hikes</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT: COMPATIBLE OR CONFLICTING?</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/13</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/13</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:50:05 PST</pubDate>
<description>Examples of wildlife-human conflicts include deer-automobile collisions, disease transmission concerns, and damage to
various commodities (e. g. agricultural crops, timber production). The extent of these problems is increasing at a time when American's
attitudes are shifting emphasis from commodity production to concern for the environment. Ecosystem management has been
proposed as a strategy to balance concerns for commodity production and the environment. Ecosystem management, unlike traditional
natural resource management, will require management over large areas for long periods of time. This new philosophy of land
management requires that the natural resource base be viewed in its entirety, and not as separate and independent parts. Ecosystem
management will require cooperative decision making by all stakeholders. The public wants to be involved in the definition of a healthy
ecosystem as well as determining management strategies that maintain and enhance the integrity of ecosystems. Social, economic and
ecological factors must be considered if ecosystem management is to be embraced by the public. Ecosystem function over the
landscape has been altered by many factors including habitat modification, elimination of large predators, and introduction of exotic
species. Examination of these factors suggests that wildlife damage management will need to be an integral part of practical ecosystem.
</description>

<author>David C. Guynn Jr.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>A COMPARISON OF DEER HUNTER AND FARMER ATTITUDES ABOUT CROP DAMAGE ABATEMENT IN MICHIGAN: MESSAGES FOR HUNTERS, FARMERS AND MANAGERS</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/12</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/12</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:47:53 PST</pubDate>
<description>During the last 20 years several states have seen dramatic changes in the size of their white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus) populations and also more frequent debates about how the deer resource should be managed. One central area of conflict
between stakeholders involved in deer management is the issue of the lethal control of depredating deer, and how and when programs
involving lethal control should be implemented. In the last decade, both Michigan farmers and deer hunters have organized special
interest groups to express their dissatisfaction with deer population numbers, deer-caused crop losses, and/or the state's crop
depredation control program. In April - June 1995, we surveyed agricultural producers (n= 596) and deer hunters (n= 792) in 7
Michigan counties about their attitudes and behaviors regarding deer and deer management. We identified several factors that appear to
influence farmer and deer hunter attitudes about the Michigan Department of Natural Resources' use of Block and Shooting Permits in
their management approach to deer-crop depredation. Perceptions of program administration are an important factor impacting on
both farmer and deer hunter approval of Shooting and Block Permits. Deer hunter approval of Shooting and Block Permits also
appears to be influenced by the perceived fairness of the permit system and the proximity of the hunter's place of residence to the area
in which they hunt.
</description>

<author>Peter A. Fritzell Jr.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>A STRATEGY FOR INTEGRATING PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTS OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE CONTROL INTO THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/11</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/11</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:45:02 PST</pubDate>
<description>This paper reports an approach to educating today's youth concerning the importance of regulating numbers
of wildlife species that threaten property, products and health. The emphases are on preparing teachers to integrate
principles and concepts into the existing curricular materials, justifying control measures with ecological understandings
and economic is information and dealing effectively with sensitive animal rights issues. Opportunities for integration of
specific wildlife damage control topics are suggested for lessons in the life sciences, social sciences, health, language arts
and mathematics. Examples of conflict between groups of different opinions about the seriousness of a pest's activities
or appropriateness of control are given with rationale for resolution of the problem. Evaluation by the classroom
teachers of the applicability and effectiveness of the strategy was generally enthusiastic.
</description>

<author>Thomas A. Eddy</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A NEW MOLE REPELLENT FOR PREVENTING DAMAGE TO LAWNS BY EASTERN MOLES</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/10</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:43:14 PST</pubDate>
<description>A new product containing 65% castor oil with the trade name Mole-Med was evaluated for its effectiveness
in repelling eastern moles (Scalopus aquaticus)  from lawns. Seven lawns in southern Michigan during September, 1993
was selected as preliminary test sites, and the ridges over mole tunnels in the lawns were flattened each day for 3 days. If
some existing and new ridges were raised each day, the site was classified as having mole activity and continuing damage.
The repellent was then applied according to label directions, and ridges above mole tunnels were flattened as described
previously. If no tunnels were raised on the test lawn after one week, the repellent was considered to be effective. The
repellent was classified as effective on all 7 test lawns. In May-July, 1994, 17 additional lawns were selected in the same
way as preliminary test sites and classified as having or not having mole damage. Eleven received repellent treatment, while
6 were considered control, 3 adjacent to a treated area, 3 not adjacent to treated areas. Raised mole produced ridges were
flatted on all test sites. On any site where ridges remained flattened and no new ridges were created for one week, moles
were considered repelled. Mole activity as indicated by raised ridges ceased on eleven treated sites but continued on 5 of
6 control sites. The effectiveness of the repellent as indicated by the lack of new ridges continued for 65 days on one
treatment site and for 30 days on the remaining treatment sites.
</description>

<author>Glenn R. Dudderar</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>ASSESSMENT OF GNAWING BEHAVIOR OF THREE RODENT SPECIES ON AUTOMATIC SPEED CONTROL MECHANISM DIAPHRAGMS FROM GM AUTOMOBILES</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/9</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:38:27 PST</pubDate>
<description>General Motors and the A C. Rochester Company, a subsidiary of General Motors (GM), has found that the robber
diaphragms on automatic speed control mechanisms (servos) were gnawed by unknown rodents. House mice (Mus musculus),
Peromyscus spp., and eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus) were used to test gnawing behavior on 4 kinds of diaphragms. Diaphragms
with or without a rodent proof cure formula, which are used by GM, did not influence the gnawing of all test rodent species.
Diaphragms with a lubricant (Paricin) were more attractive to gnawing by house mice than diaphragms without a lubricant. Five objects
with different texture were used to detect gnawing preference of house mice and 3 objects were used on Peromyscus. The textures of
diaphragms and nylon discs were not significantly preferred by house mice compared to the textures of corks and wood blocks. Rubber
stoppers were gnawed less than wood blocks and corks by house mice and Peromyscus, but the differences were not significant. Results
indicate that the presence of a rigid and protective edge on the diaphragms was a critical factor in attracting rodent gnawing. To test this
possibility, diaphragms on servos supported by aluminum piston heads with 3 different beveled edges were presented to captive
Peromyscus. The amount of gnawing was not significantly different among the diaphragms supported by the different piston heads.
Once the gnawing was initiated, continued gnawing was thought to be dependent on the texture of objects.
</description>

<author>Glenn R. Dudderar</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>ECOLOGY AND CONTROL OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE TO ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/8</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:34:16 PST</pubDate>
<description>This study addresses several aspects of the ecology and control of wildlife damage to electric substations because the
amount of existing research is not sufficient to make informed decisions about how best to minimize that damage. Records of 121
incidents of animal-caused faults showed that 78°I° of the faults were caused by squirrels and raccoons and an average of 2,511
customers lost service doting the outage caused by such a fault. Animal damage control measures were evaluated by observing
challenges to cool measures by raccoons and squirrels at a substation. The control measures were breached twice because they had not
been properly applied. In 1994, 301 transmission and distribution substations in Michigan were sampled and categorized based on
various structural and habitat characteristics. Significant relationships (p &#60; 0.10) were found between faulted substations and the number
of nests in the substation, the distance of water from the substation, and the beam type used in the substation.
</description>

<author>Glenn R. Dudderar</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>BEAVER IMPACTS ON TIMBER ON THE CHAUGA RIVER DRAINAGE IN SOUTH CAROLINA</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/7</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:28:06 PST</pubDate>
<description>Even though beavers (Castor canadensis carolinensis) occur over most of the southeastern United States, the impacts of
increasing beaver populations on riparian forests within the southern Appalachian mountains are. not been well documented.
Long-tenor browsing and inundation by beaver may alter the composition and structure of riparian forests. A survey of 62 streams (74
mi) within the Chauga River drainage in the mountains of South Carolina was conducted during 1991-1992 to determine the level of
beaver activity within the drainage and the amount of timber damaged by beaver activities. Thirty-six streams had evidence of
significant beaver activity with a total of 5.3 mi (7.2%) affected by beaver. Twenty-six streams (17.3 mi), primarily those with steep
gradients and no flood plains, had no evidence of beaver activity. On beaver impacted areas, values of beaver damaged timber averaged
$781.27/ac for sawtimber and $36.01/ac for pulpwood While high in terms of volume/acre within impacted riparian areas, timber
damage was relatively minor for the entire drainage because of the small area (49.2 ac) affected.
</description>

<author>J. Rickie Dams</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>EVALUATION OF THE YARD GARD ULTRASONIC YARD PROTECTOR FOR REPELLING WHITE-TAILED DEER</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/6</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:23:56 PST</pubDate>
<description>Ultrasonic devices are marketed for pest control because some manufacturers believe they possess properties aversive to
animals. However, there is little evidence that ultrasound is more aversive to animals than is audible sound. In this study, we examined
the efficacy of the Yard Gard ultrasonic device for deterring deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from feeding on apples. Four deer feeding
stations were established at private residential properties with a history of deer damage to ornamental plants, so that control (A I and B
1) and experimental (A2 and 132) stations existed at each site. Apples were placed at each feeding station and restocked daily from
mid-February to mid-March 1995. Yard Gard devices were set up at one station at each site, and we monitored daily deer activity by
counting: (1) apples remaining, (2) deer tracks, and (3) deer fecal pellet groups at all feeding stations. Of the 360 total apples offered at
site A while the devices were on, 175.0 (97.2%) and 179.5 (99.7%) apples were consumed at control (Al) and experimental (A2)
stations, respectively. Of the 400 total apples offered at site B while the devices were on, 188 (94.0%) and 196.5 (98.3%) apples were
consumed at control (B 1) and experimental (B2) stations, respectively. Apple consumption at feeding stations proved to be the only
quantitative data which provided a consistent measure of deer activity. Behavioral observations made at each site revealed that several
deer visited the control and experimental feeding stations while Yard Gard devices were on, Apparently, the deer were alerted by the
ultrasonic emissions but were not deterred from consuming apples. In conclusion, this study produced no evidence that the Yard Gard
ultrasonic device protected the area from deer activity, or preferred foods from deer damage.
</description>

<author>Paul D. Curtis</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>PREY AVAILABILITY AND SELECTION BY MOUNTAIN LIONS IN ARAVAIPA-KLONDYKE AREA OF ARIZONA</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/5</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:21:48 PST</pubDate>
<description>Prey selection by mountain lions (Felis concolor) in the Aravaipa-Klondyke area (2,000 km) in southeastern
Arizona was studied from February 1991 through September 1993. Overall diet from frequency of occurrence as determined from
370 scats was: 48% deer (white-tailed and mule deer combined), 34% cattle, 17% javelinas, 6% rabbit (cottontail and jackrabbit),
4% rodent, and 2% desert bighorn. Using a correction factor developed by Ackerman et al. (1984), we also estimated percent
biomass and proportion of individuals killed. With respect to biomass consumed, cattle was 44%, deer 40%, javelinas 10.9%,
rabbits 2.9%, and rodents 0.02%. Based on weights of prey consumed, proportion of individuals eaten changed to rabbits 52.7%,
deer 16.3%, rodents 12%, javelinas 10% cattle 8%, and desert bighorn 0.5% Comparisons with availability as determined from
four separate four-day double-count helicopter surveys found that lions selected calves (ate more than expected based on
availability alone), killed and ate less deer than expected, and javelinas as would be expected.
</description>

<author>Stan C. Cunning</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>PESTICIDE USE BY THE FEDERAL/COOPERATIVE ANIMAL DAMAGE CONTROL (ADC) PROGRAM, 1988-1991</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/4</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:17:38 PST</pubDate>
<description>ADC personnel use many wildlife damage control methods including pesticide products. This paper presents a
national overview of the kinds and amounts of chemical pesticides used by ADC in direct control activities during Fiscal Years
(FY) 1988-1991. The pesticides used by ADC included aluminum phosphide, 4-aminopyridine, bone tar oil, brodifacoum,
carbon, alpha-chloralose, cholecalciferol, DRC-1339, fenthion, glyphosate, immobilizing &#38; euthanizing drugs, mineral oil,
PA-14, phosphorus, polybutene, sodium cyanide, sodium fluoroacetate, sodium nitrate, strychnine, sulfur, and zinc phosphide.
This summary shows that ADC personnel used remarkably small amounts of chemicals during FY 19881991. Overall amounts
of pesticides used by ADC have changed little since that time period, although uses of some pesticide products have decreased
(PA-14 and strychnine) while others increased (repellents, glyphosate, alpha-chloralose, and the Compound 1080 LPC). Pesticide
uses by ADC program personnel are increasingly limited, selective, and environmentally safe if not environmentally benign.
</description>

<author>Guy Connolly</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>APPLE PRODUCTION, VOLE CONTROL, AND WILD TURKEYS: FINDING A BALANCE IN VERMONT</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:14:32 PST</pubDate>
<description>Meadow voles (Crotus pennsylvanicus) and pine voles (Crotus inetorum) cause extensive damage to apple trees by
gnawing and girdling trunk and root systems. In 1991, approximately 70% of Vermont's 90 commercial apple producers were
using zinc phosphide (ZP) treated cracked corn to manage vole damage. From November 1991 throughout January 1992, 36
confirmed wild turkey deaths were attributed to the broadcast application of ZP treated cracked coin in Vermont
orchards. As a result of public concern regarding impacts to nontarget wild turkeys, a working group was formed with
representation of various state and federal agencies as well as the apple industry to address this issue and review current vole
damage management strategies. Since 1992, statewide voluntary compliance with working group recommendations that included
shifting to ZP treated rolled oats have reduced the risk of wild turkey exposure to ZP. In this paper we discuss the effectiveness
of the working group recommendations as measured by a mail survey of apple producers as well as a preliminary 4-year analysis
of statewide rodenticide sales.
</description>

<author>Richard B. Chipman</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>COMPARISON OF PREDATION RATES ON WILD TURKEY HENS BETWEEN TWO FOREST ECOSYSTEMS IN MISSISSIPPI </title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/2</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:09:26 PST</pubDate>
<description>Because of increases in predator populations, concern has arisen about effects on wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo ) populations. We examined differences in predation of adult hens between 2 forested areas in Mississippi. Twin
Oaks Wildlife Management Area (OAKS), located in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, is a 2,302 ha tract of mature
bottomland hardwood forest surrounded on 3 sides by soybean fields. Tallahala Wildlife Management Area (TWMA) is a
14,410 ha mixed forest in central Mississippi and is part of a large, forested ecosystem. Hens were captured, fitted with
transmitters, and monitored by telemetry, 1990-1994 on TWMA (n = 86) and on OAKS (n=23) during 1994. Mortality
rate from canids (Canis spp.) and bobcats (felis rufus
 was higher (0.43) on OAKS than on TWMA (0.16).
Higher predation rate on OAKS may have been caused by the fragmented nature of OAKS, a lack of a ground story
vegetation layer, and poor nest habitat conditions. A higher prey base (i.e., small mammals) on OAKS may have
contributed to higher canid/felid populations. Managers may need to reconsider predator control measures on
fragmented forests when attempting to manage for high wild turkey densities.
</description>

<author>Michael J. Chamberlain</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH EASTERN WILDLIFE DAMAGE CONTROL CONFERENCE</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc7/1</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:02:24 PST</pubDate>
<description>Table of Contents</description>

<author>James B. Armstrong - Editor</author>


</item>




</channel>
</rss>
