On analytical methods and inferences for 2 x 2 contingency table data using wildlife examples

Authors

Richard M. Engeman, USDA-APHIS-Wildlife ServicesFollow
George D. Swanson, Physical Education and Exercise Science Department, California State University, Chico, CA

Date of this Version

December 2003

Comments

Published by International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 52 (2003) 213-246.

Abstract

The 2 X 2 contingency table is common analytical method for wildlife studies, but inappropriate analyses and inferences are not uncommon. Issues of concern are presented for selecting the appropriate test for analyzing these data sets. These include the choice of test relative to experimental or sampling design and breadth of intended inferences, the careful statement of hypotheses, and analyses with small sample sizes. Examples from the wildlife literature are used to reinforce the statistical concepts.