Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for
Title
Direct, Spillover, and Intangible Benefits of Predation Management
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
October 2004
Predation management is a controversial
and often misunderstood reality
of livestock management. Few on either
side of the argument would believe that
some sort of management is not necessary
to limit livestock losses. Opposition
to the lethal removal of predators characterizes
most debates. While most of
the opposition reflects a moral opinion
about the manner in which people relate
to the natural world, opponents of lethal
control often argue that control is not
economically justified.
Simple economic justification would
require that benefits of predation management
outweigh the costs. If the only
goal of predation management were to be
economically efficient, minimization of
costs would be one of the primary objectives;
however, current predation management
philosophies focus on minimum
disruption to natural processes. These
include focusing lethal management of
offending individuals and populations,
and using methods (such as aerial hunting)
that are expensive but highly selective
and humane. Boardman et al. (1996)
discuss that the objective of minimizing
costs is the same as maximizing net benefits.
The costs of management, while
important, play a minor role in the selection
of management strategies.
Costs of management include direct
expenditures by producers for management
programs, governmental expenditures
for management and compensation
programs, producer and governmental
costs associated with preventing predation,
and societal values associated with
the predators removed. Costs of predation
management programs are usually
easier to quantify, can have significant
variance and typically are concentrated
to a few individuals, while the benefits
are dispersed among many. For this reason,
the authors intend to focus on the
benefits of predation management programs.

Comments
Published in Sheep & Goat Research Journal 19 (2004). Copyright © 2004 The American Sheep Industry Association. Used by permission.