<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Nebraska Anthropologist</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 University of Nebraska - Lincoln All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro</link>
<description>Recent documents in Nebraska Anthropologist</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:43:17 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>AFRICAN INFLUENCE IN MEXICAN FOLKTALES</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/158</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/158</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:00:45 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Despite the fact that many African slaves were brought to the Jew World, there have been very few studies done on how their presence affected studies that have and influenced the indigenous cultures. The been done concentrate on the areas where there was an extremely large Black population like Cuba and Brazil. Very little has been done in places like Mexico or Chile and those that have been done are often inaccurate. This paper is an elementary attempt to take a close look at how the importation of African slaves affected the culture of the New World.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Carla Mundt</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>THE PLOW AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE RISE OF CIVILIZATION</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/157</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/157</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:58:40 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In the magical land of Toosuiter, Butane worked his small garden.  He worked with his little digging stick clearing the patch of eternal rock that seemed to multiply from one season to the next.  Then he'd sing the little redundant ditty: "Little poke here, little seed there, little poke here, little seed there."</p>
<p>He planted his seeds and delicately covered them up with the fresh fertile earth.  Yams were a delicacy.  They really "tasted good" with the fresh meat that Pamela, his wife, would hunt in the surrounding forest.  It was a magical life, and the land and the forest provided everything.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Tom Langdon</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>MANIOC AND FISH: A &quot;METHIONONIAN&quot; COMPROMISE IN AMAZONIA?</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/156</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/156</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:53:04 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Protein as a limiting factor in Amazonian diet has met with considerable discussion and argument (e.g., Beckerman 1979; Chagnon and Hames 1979; Johnson 1982; Gross 1975, 1982; Spath 1978, 1981; Werner <em>et al.</em> 1979).  The intent of this paper is to continue the discussion of protein as a limiting factor in Amazonia with respect to two dietary staples, manioc and fish.  More specifically, does bitter manioc become a factor in determining aquatic resource utilization in Amazonia?</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Tom Langdon</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>&lt;i&gt;The Nebraska Anthropologist&lt;/i&gt; Volume 6 (1983) Contents</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/155</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/155</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:47:18 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............. i</p>
<p><em>HUMAN ADAPTATIONS IN THE ANDES: A LOOK AT NUTRITION AND BRAIN FUNCTION WITH RESPECT TO COCA AND HIGH ALTITUDE PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS</em> (Barrett P. Brenton) .............. 1</p>
<p>Introduction .............. 2</p>
<p>Biochemical Aspects of Tryptophan and Serotonin .............. 2</p>
<p>Nutritional Control of Brain Tryptophan and Serotonin .............. 3</p>
<p>Food and Nutrition in the South American Andes .............. 7</p>
<p>Diet Composition and Tryptophan/Serotonin Production .............. 9</p>
<p>The Affects of Coca Chewing and Serotonin in Thermoregulation .............. 16</p>
<p>Possible Effects of Coca Alkaloids and Serotonin in Hypoxia .............. 18</p>
<p>Conclusion............... 23</p>
<p>References .............. 25</p>
<p><em>MANIOC AND FISH: A "METHIONONIAN" COMPROMISE IN AMAZONIA? </em>(Tom Langdon) .............. 28</p>
<p>References .............. 59</p>
<p><em>EARLY AUSTRALOPITHECINE SEED EATERS: A VALID HYPOTHESIS </em>(Cathie Masters) .............. 63</p>
<p>Expectations for climate .............. 68</p>
<p>Expectations for available wild grasses and grains .............. 68</p>
<p>Expectations for niche availability.............. 70</p>
<p>Expectations for a seed eating technology in the archaeological record .............. 74</p>
<p>Expectations for a seed eating physiology .............. 77</p>
<p>Expectations for a seed eating dental morphology .............. 79</p>
<p>Expectations for optimal foraging .............. 85</p>
<p>Conclusion .............. 86</p>
<p>References .............. 88</p>
<p><em>AN ATTEMPT TO PUT ONE ASPECT OF THE CENTRAL PLAINS TRADITION INTO FOCUS </em>(Elizabeth Barker) .............. 92</p>
<p>Introduction .............. 93</p>
<p>Eight Basic Assumptions of Relevance to Archaeological Research .............. 93</p>
<p>The Pomona Focus .............. 101</p>
<p>A New Perspective .............. 104</p>
<p>Conclusion .............. 106</p>
<p>Footnotes .............. 107</p>
<p>References .............. 108</p>
<p><em>PRECIPITATION AND DIVERSITY IN FARMING </em>(Janis Dial) .............. 111</p>
<p>Introduction .............. 112</p>
<p>Precipitation as a Limiting Factor .............. 112</p>
<p>Diversification in Farming .............. 113</p>
<p>Problem Statement .............. 116</p>
<p>Methodology .............. 116</p>
<p>Results Regarding Data Sources .............. 123</p>
<p>Results Regarding Precipitation and Diversity .............. 129</p>
<p>Conclusions .............. 131</p>
<p>References .............. 132</p>
<p><em>AFRICAN INFLUENCE IN MEXICAN FOLKTALES </em> (Carla Mundt) .............. 136</p>
<p>References .............. 150</p>
<p><em>THE PLOW AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE RISE OF CIVILIZATION </em>(Tom Langdon) .............. 152</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>HUMAN ADAPTATIONS IN THE ANDES: A LOOK AT NUTRITION AND BRAIN FUNCTION WITH RESPECT TO COCA AND HIGH ALTITUDE PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/154</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/154</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:36:57 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Throughout the span of human evolution the brain has allowed itself to be controlled by nutritional intake. This correlation between nutrition and the brain has led me to believe that the human brain has allowed itself to be manipulated and controlled by an individual's dietary intake in order to successfully adapt to the environment. In looking at the indigenous peoples of the South American Andes, I found surprising parallels between human physiological adaptations to high altitude hypoxia and cold stress and the correlating control of neurotransmitters to the brain by dietary intake.</p>
<p>In a study of this type it becomes necessary to first break the barriers of scientific jargon and give a brief overview of the biochemical aspects involved in the study of nutrition and the brain. Within the context of this paper I have chosen to deal primarily with the neurotransmitter, serotonin, and its precursor tryptophan, due to their possible correlations with high altitude adaption.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Barrett P. Brenton</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>CONNOISSEURS OF CAVIAR</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/153</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/153</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:32:49 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Most of the published works concerning the Woodland burial mound complex of the Rainy River District of northern Minnesota and contiguous Ontario pertain to defining the culture history of this region. More specifically, they have focused on the intra and inter site variability of ceramic types (Wilford 1955, Stoltman 1973, 1974, Lugenbeal 1978). These studies have defined a detailed culture history of the Middle (Laurel) and Late Woodland (Blackduck) phases of this region. Currently, the information which has been published on the burial mound complex have shed little light on the economic, social and political systems of the prehistoric peoples of the Rainy River District.</p>
<p>The information available on the subsistence practices of these peoples suggests a hunting and gathering economy with a high degree of seasonal mobility. The political organization characteristic of this type of economy is usually portrayed as an egalitarian one (Service 1964). However, the presence of burial mounds implies a more complex social, political, and economic system than would be associated with a hunting and gathering economy and an egalitarian political organization.</p>
<p>Describing the Hopewellian mound complex in the midwest, Martin, Quimby, and Collier (1947:277) state ...burial mounds imply a social structure capable of organizing a co-operative labor project on a large scale. Albert Spaulding implies that a complex social organization and an efficient economic base would have been necessary for the development of the burial mound complex of the Adena culture (1955:19-20). This effective economic base was, during Adena times, a mixed hunting-gathering and maize agriculture economy. Later, during the Hopewellian tradition, the economic base shifted to one of more intensive maize agriculture. If we assume that the rise of burial mound complexes reflect a more complex form of social organization than is possible under a hunting and gathering subsistence base then the burial mounds associated with the Woodland tradition of the Rainy River District present us with a special problem. It has been shown (Yarnell 1964:128) that this region was unsuitable for effective maize agriculture. If, in this region, maize agriculture is ruled out as a resource which has the potential for large scale group integration then an alternate resource must be sought.</p>
<p>James Stoltman (1973:6) in the introduction to <em>The Laurel Culture in Minnesota</em>, suggests the possibility that the mounds in the Rainy River District could be related to the spring spawning of sturgeon. If indeed these mounds are located at prehistoric sturgeon fisheries then sturgeon fishing could be the economic basis responsible for large scale group co-operation and a more complex form of social organization necessary for the rise of the burial mound complex in northern Minnesota and contiguous Ontario. The possibility that these mounds are located at sturgeon fisheries and that sturgeon fishing could be the catalyst for the development of these burial mounds is the subject of this paper.</p>
<p>Support for the above hypothesis will be examined with reference to at least four data sources, each of which will be discussed in the following pages. The ecological and environmental data will be used to create an overall view of the subsistence patterns which would have been necessary in order to survive in this area. A discussion of the physiology and behavior of the lake sturgeon provides an introduction into the possibility of this fish as a potential food resource for a large group of people, while the ethnohistoric records provide documented evidence of the use of the lake sturgeon as a food resource by the historic Chippewa. Lastly, the archeological reports from various Laurel sites will be discussed as they reflect the subsistence-settlement aspects of the people of the Laurel culture.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Mona Thopson</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>THE HUFF SITE A RECONSTRUCTION OF PAST LIFEWAYS</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/152</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/152</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:28:32 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The purpose of this paper is to construct, from available literature, the possible social structure of the inhabitants of the Huff Site (32MO11). Although archeology is termed as the study of the human past, with its objectives being construction of cultural chronology, reconstruction of past lifeways, and discovery of processes that underlie and condition human behavior, I feel that many times these objectives are either overlooked or only in part covered. This paper will serve as an example of possible inferences which can be made from archeological and historical data. Some inferences or hypotheses which are made in this paper are admittedly speculative. I hope to encourage others to follow the example when reconstructing past lifeways and in discovering processes that underlie human behavior.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Emery LaDean Mehrer</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>ETHNOARCHAEOLOGY -- A BIBLIOGRAPHY</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/151</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/151</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:26:52 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Pat Halama</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>HUMAN AND CULTURAL ECOLOGY: A PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/150</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/150</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:24:57 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The following bibliography represents a partial listing of books and articles dealing with human and cultural ecology.  Central to this bibliography are titles dealing with the conceptual and methodological aspects of human/cultural ecology as applicable to the broad field of anthropology.  Also of primary importance are titles dealing with the anthropological  use of population demography.  Topics of related interest (general ecology, human adaption, bioenergetics, etc.) are represented by selected titles.  While the bibliography falls far short of total citation of all articles dealing with the aforementioned topics, it should provide a firm base upon which the student or researcher may build.  Those individuals requiring further citation in more specialized areas are urged to consult the references contained with the articles of special interest.  In addition, the bibliographies contained within Anderson 1973, Bennett 1976, Hardesty 1977, and Netting 1977 are quite good and may be used to supplement many of the areas given secondary attention in the present work.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Gunn</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>CULTURAL ECOLOGY: A BRIEF OVERVIEW</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/149</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/149</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:16:39 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Cultural ecology is based on the interaction of culture, man and environment.  To the understanding of this relationship the present paper discusses the origin and development of cultural ecology, the various applications and techniques of cultural ecology by the anthropological discipline, and finally, criticisms and future goals of an ecological anthropology.</p>
<p>Ecology is not an anthropological subdiscipline, nor is it even a standardized approach in anthropology (Bates, 1953).  Ecology may be defined as the science dealing with the study of entire assemblages of living organisms and their physical milieus, which together constitute integrated systems (Anderson, 1973:182).  More simply, ecology is the study of the structure and dynamics of nature, mankind being a part of nature (Olum, 1975:1). Both of these definitions stem from concepts developed from biology and the biological nature of the world. The dualism which separates the study of "natural environment" from the study of "human environment" had effectively in the past to isolate the natural sciences from the social sciences. The holistic concept of ecosystem -- a type of general system capable of including the activities of man -- has recently gained wide acceptance. The ecosystem conceptually unites the biology, organization, and behavior of man with other animals, plants, and inorganic concepts within a single framework in which the interaction of the components may be studied (Anderson, 1973: 183). This is particularly appealing to anthropology since it allows for the study of the mutually dependent interactions of organic, inorganic, and sociocultural components.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Gunn</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>A REVIEW OF THE INITIAL COALESCENT VARIANT</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/148</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/148</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:08:21 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Initial Coalescent Variant of the Middle Missouri Sub-area (Lehmer 1971) poses many problems for archeologists working with the culture history of the Central/Northern Plains Areas. The Initial Coalescent should not, however, be considered as strictly confined to the localities of the Big Bend Dam and Pierre, South Dakota, as Lehmer (1971) suggests. Manifestations of this cultural complex can be found as far away as the Niobrara River valley in Boyd County, Nebraska at the Lynch Site (25BD1) (Caldwell 1966). This site has been grouped with the prototype Initial Coalescent site, the Arzberger Site (39HU6), into a taxonomic unit known as the Anoka Focus (Witty 1962), based on the similarities of ceramic vessel forms.</p>
<p>Foremost among the problems concerning the Initial Coalescent sites are questions concerning the origin of this culture complex. These problems arise from the identification of cultural elements from the Central Plains Tradition and the Middle Missouri Tradition. Another problem apparent in the literature concerning the Initial Coalescent is the question of causation for the rise of this cultural entity. The most prevalent theory accounting for the rise of this culture is some type of environmental shift to drier conditions and the subsequent associated consequences of this phenomena. This paper, however, will not focus on the causal reasons of the rise of this culture due to what is perceived as the absence of reliable information in the literature. Instead, this paper is intended primarily as a review of the taxonomic identifications applied to the Initial Coalescent, a review of origin explanations, and a review of the four major village sites. In addition, the trait contributions of the Central Plains and Middle Missouri Tradition to the Initial Coalescent will be partially examined.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Greg Fox</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>&lt;i&gt;The Nebraska Anthropologist&lt;/i&gt; Volume 5 (1980) Contents</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/147</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/147</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:06:26 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............ i</p>
<p>LIST OF FIGURES ............ iv</p>
<p><em>A REVIEW OF THE INITIAL COALESCENT VARIANT </em>(Greg Fox) ............ 1</p>
<p>Taxonomic Identifications ............ 1</p>
<p>The Sites ............ 2</p>
<p>The Arzberger Site (39HU6) ............ 3</p>
<p>The Black Partizan Site (39LM2l8) ............ 4</p>
<p>The Crow Creek Site (39BFl) ............ 4</p>
<p>The Talking Crow Site (39BF3) ............ 6</p>
<p>Archeological Origin Myths ............ 7</p>
<p>Dating the Initial Coalescent Variant ............ 11</p>
<p>Central Plains and Middle Missouri Tradition Traits ............ 12</p>
<p>Central Plains Tradition Trait Contributions ............ 13</p>
<p>Middle Missouri Tradition Cultural Traits ............ 14</p>
<p>Summary ............ 15</p>
<p>References Cited ............ 16</p>
<p><em>CULTURAL ECOLOGY: A BRIEF OVERVIEW</em> (Michael Gunn) ............ 18</p>
<p>References Cited ............ 24</p>
<p><em>HUMAN AND CULTURAL ECOLOGY: A PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY</em> (Michael Gunn) ............ 28</p>
<p><em>ETHNOARCHAEOLOGY -- A BIBLIOGRAPHY</em> (Pat Halama) ............ 73</p>
<p><em>THE HUFF SITE: "A RECONSTRUCTION OF PAST LIFEWAYS"</em> (Emery LaDean Mehrer) ............ 91</p>
<p>Introduction ............  93</p>
<p>Environmental Setting ............ 93</p>
<p>Archaeological Background ............ 93</p>
<p>Aboriginal Subsistence ............94</p>
<p>Social Organization ............ 95</p>
<p>Political Organization ............ 97</p>
<p>Religious Organization ............ 100</p>
<p>Summary ............ 103</p>
<p>References Cited ............ 105</p>
<p><em>CONNOISSEURS OF CAVIAR</em> (Mona Thompson) ............ 107</p>
<p>Environmental and Ecological Data ............ 108</p>
<p>Ethnohistorical Reports of Chippewa (Ojibwa) Sturgeon Fishing ............ 111</p>
<p>Archeology of Laurel Sites ............ 113</p>
<p>Conclusion ............ 114</p>
<p>References Cited ............ 116</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ANTHROPOLOGY-RELATED SERIAL PUBLICATIONS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LIBRARIES</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/146</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/146</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:55:40 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This bibliography of anthropological serials in the University of Nebraska Libraries has been undertaken primarily for two reasons. The first follows from the incredibly diverse nature of the discipline itself, for the study of man and his origins has given rise to various methods of inquiry and interdisciplinary overlays. As Sol Tax has pointed out, the study of man appears to have no natural boundaries. It comes as little surprise, therefore, that the bibliography representing the published record of such a varied field of study should itself be extremely diffuse. Add to this natural diffusion the characteristic pattern of dispersed library holdings throughout various branch locations and in several stack areas within the main library, and the situation becomes all the more confusing. This bibliography represents an attempt to bring together a single listing of all serial titles within the UNL collections pertaining to one or another of the sub-fields of anthropology, with locational and holdings information for each title. It is hoped that the product of this undertaking will bring some semblance of order out of diversity and will serve to enhance access to the collections.</p>
<p>The second reason for undertaking the project pertains to the relative strengh of retrospective holdings within the UNL libraries. Admittedly, the budget cuts of recent years have precluded any possibility of maintaining the collection at an adequate level. Nevertheless, the UNL collections reflect some thorough and systematic bibliographic spadework in years gone by, particularly for North American archaeology and ethnology. This bibliography will hopefully bring this fact more fully to light. Due to various problems of providing adequate access to library collections in the past, it is doubtful whether these rather extensive holdings are being utilized to a very full extent. The prospect of unearthing a "good", if not "excellent" collection, plus the hope that access to the materials might be enhanced, would each be adequate justification for undertaking this bibliographic project.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kenneth P. Lohrentz et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>CLAUDE LEVI-STRAUSS: The Man and His Works</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/145</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/145</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:52:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>"Claude Levi-Strauss, Professor of Social Anthropology at the College de France, is, by common consent, the most distinguished exponent of this particular academic trade to be found anywhere outside the English speaking world... " (Leach 1970: 7)</p>
<p>With this in mind, I am still wondering how I came to be embroiled in an attempt not only to understand the multifaceted theorizing of Levi-Strauss myself, but to interpret even a portion of this wide inventory to my colleagues. There is much (the majority, perhaps) of Claude Levi-Strauss which eludes me yet. To quote Edmund Leach again, "The outstanding characteristic of his writing, whether in French or in English, is that it is difficult to understand; his sociological theories combine baffling complexity with overwhelming erudition" (Leach 1970: 8). In addition, the whole corpus of Levi-Strauss' writings is packed with plays on words, oblique references and puns. I ask that the reader bear with my tentative exploration into the mind of this enigmatic man.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Susan M. Voss</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>EVOLUTION FOR ANTHROPOLOGY: SETTING OUR HOUSE IN ORDER (A Review of &lt;i&gt;Bringing It All Back Home&lt;/i&gt; by Gerald D. Berreman)</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/144</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/144</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:48:03 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In Berreman's article, as in most of the other articles in <em>Reinventing Anthropology</em>, the main topic of discussion is that, once again, the need for change has presented itself in the discipline: anthropology needs to be reinvented. The changes called for have to do with relevance, responsibility, receptivity and the like. None of the authors offers much in the way of suggestions for accomplishing this ideological overhaul for anthropology; they only acknowledge the need for it. Processes of change are characteristically disruptive, producing harmful and negative effects during the transition, and change in anthropology is no different.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dennis Toom</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>RESPONSIBILITY IN ANTHROPOLOGY (A Review of &lt;i&gt;The Life and Culture of Ecotopia&lt;/i&gt; by E. N. Anderson, Jr.)</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/143</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/143</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:44:33 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>A great deal of discussion in recent anthropological literature has been directed toward "relevance in anthropology". The issues which are confronted under the concept of relevance in anthropology would be perhaps more correctly labeled "responsibility in anthropology".</p>
<p>Relevance is defined as pertinence and, social applicability, in other words, the ability, to satisfy a need. The concept of responsibility encompasses this social applicability but also includes moral and rational accountability for one's conduct and obligations. Not only is it the ability to satisfy a need but the accountability for the actions taken to satisfy the need and the repercussions which follow.</p>
<p>Just as it is true that each anthropologist must reinvent anthropology for himself or herself, each anthropologist must be held accountable and responsible for his or her research. This is not merely a matter of professional ethics and the responsibility of producing accurate and valid research. It also includes the responsibility for uses that are made of the anthropologist's work and the entire range of repercussions which pertain to these uses. This is a tremendous responsibility and one which increases the amount of planning and preparation occurring in connection with research. But it is an ethical problem not peculiar to anthropology or even the social sciences. Almost every profession is beginning to feel demands for accountability and responsibility.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Prudence Sadler</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Review of &lt;i&gt; The Grant Oneota Village&lt;/i&gt; by Marshall McKusick</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/142</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/142</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:39:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Marshall McKusick's monograph, <em>The Grant Oneota Village</em>, reports the results of excavations at the Grant Village site (13AM201). Grant Village is a multicomponent site located on the Hartley Terrace of the Upper Iowa River, Allamakee County, Iowa. The main focus of the report is the description and interpretation of house remains found on the terrace. The site is a very important one for Oneota specialists as it offers the possibility of much new information on house form and community patterning. Other topics covered include a discussion of Oneota taxonomy, a cultural chronology of the Hartley Terrace, and ethnohistotic parallels for the excavated houses. Descriptive sections covering bone, stone, and ceramic artifacts are also included. The monograph follows <em>Current Anthropology</em> with commentary and author's reply sections.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Carol Raish</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>A &apos;HEDGE&apos; AGAINST CULTURAL DOMINANCE (A Review of &lt;i&gt; Counter Culture and Cultural Hegemony: Some Notes on the Youth Rebellion of the 1960&apos;s&lt;/i&gt; by A. Norman Klein)</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/141</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/141</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:35:41 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>During the 1960's, student unrest became an issue of international proportions. College-age protesters participated in various forms of dissent (peaceful and violent) for various reasons. Because of their break with conventional beliefs and customs, the youth of the 60's were identified as a subculture or "counter culture". This counter culture was established to protest critical issues ignored by the dominant culture. In his article on counter culture and cultural hegemony, A. Norman Klein addresses the nature of cultural dominance in America. He argues that a study of the youth movement of the 60's reveals the true character of hegemonic culture.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Patrick F. McCarty</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS: THE ROLE OF THE NATIVE (A Review of &lt;i&gt;A Critical Analysis&lt;/i&gt; by Michael L. Blake)</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/140</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/140</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:28:11 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The author seems to be greatly concerned about current trends within his profession of Anthropological Linguistics.  He has made some extremely valid observations and some equally valid suggestions to reconstruct the field of Linguistics in order to deal with pertinent problems of today.</p>
<p>Hale views Anthropology as a product of its origin. He believes that it is constrained by the limitations of a white Anglo-Saxon denomination in the field, in academic endeavors, and more precisely in its most important aspect, it's application. In particular he attacks the idea that non-native speakers, as objective observers, are more successful. The probable cause for such success is that compiled data is more readily available to application by "Imperialistic Western Powers," and thus gains support from certain government agencies.</p>
<p>The author suggests that a reversal of proportion with a dominance by native speakers within the field would be more successful in accomplishing the original goals of Anthropology. I disagree, I believe that a balance of native and non-native speakers would be much more appealing. I would favor a cooperative effort in solving questions of relevance for the benefit of all concerned.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kenneth Hale</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>A PERSONAL VISION of A MORE MEANINGFUL ANTHROPOLOGY (A Review of &lt;i&gt; Personal and Extrapersonal Vision in Anthropology&lt;/i&gt; by Robert Jay)</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/139</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/139</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:17:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In an unpublished paper presented to the AAA Annual meeting in 1969, Robin Ridington discusses "The Anthropology of Experience" (also the title). The paper relates the story of Jumping Mouse, a not-so-ordinary field mouse. Jumping Mouse leaves his brothers to satisfy his curiosity about the rushing sound in his head. The story makes special note that Jumping Mouse can see only a short distance ahead of himself as he travels, the philosophical implication being that he has limited vision. Curiosity becomes a quest after Jumping Mouse sees the rushing river; he the strives to reach the sacred mountains way off in the distance. Along the way he encounters several guides; two of them are ill. In each case the medicine that will make them well (and will enable them to guide Jumping Mouse to his goal) is a mouse's eye. Even though it means arriving at his destination blind, Jumping Mouse gives his eyes to his "brothers". Alone and unable to see, Jumping Mouse waits beside the mountain lake for the end. He is certain he will be the victim of the "spots", the eagles overhead. Suddenly there is an impact and Jumping Mouse can see. He can see farther and further as he soars higher and higher. Jumping Mouse shouts, "Hello, brother frog" and his friend shouts back, "Hello, brother eagle".</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>David C. Dominik</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
