Public Policy Center, University of Nebraska
Title
Introduction to International Perspectives on Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Part II
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
October 2000
Abstract
Therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) is flourishing. There is a proliferation of articles being
published. In addition, books are being written, and in the past several years, conferences
devoted to TJ have been held. (For a listing of over 300 books and articles, see
http://www.law.arizona.edu/upr-intj and follow the “Cumulative Bibliography” link.)
Some recent examples: Professors Bruce Winick and David Wexler, who developed
the TI concept, teamed with former University of Denver Law Dean Edward Dauer
(internationally known for his work in preventive law) to edit a special issue of the
journal Psychology, Public Policy, and Law on “Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Preventive
Law: Transforming Legal Practice and Education” (volume 5, number 4, 1999).
Judge Steve Leben (Johnson County, Kansas), editor of Court Review: The Journal of
the American Judges Association, organized a special issue of the journal on TI (volume
37, issue 1, 2000). In addition, the Second International Conference on Therapeutic
Jurisprudence will be held on 3-5 May, 2001, at the Kingsgate Conference Center
at the University of Cincinnati. One can find out about various TJ activities from
the web site hosted by the International Network on Therapeutic Jurisprudence at the
above web address.
We are pleased that BS&L is another scholarly journal participating in international
TI efforts. Last year, BS&L published the first of two special issues on TI (volume
17, number 5, 1999). The first issue contained several articles that originated as
papers presented at the First International Conference on Therapeutic Jurisprudence
held in Winchester, UK, in the summer of 1998. The present issue is the second of
the two issues, and it includes five more articles that started as Winchester conference
papers (Allan & Allan; Birgden & Vincent; Drogin; Elbogen & Tomkins; and McGuire), along with three other articles not from the Winchester conference (Casey &
Rottman; Levine; and Slobogin & Fondacaro).

Comments
Published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law 18 (2000), pp. 411-412. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Used by permission.