<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Joshua Scottow Papers</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2007 University of Nebraska - Lincoln All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow</link>
<description>Recent documents in Joshua Scottow Papers</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 01:21:48 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	



<item>
<title>Gov. Thomas Dudley&apos;s Letter to the Countess of Lincoln. March 1631.</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow/9</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:28:58 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The following copy of the Letter of Thomas Dudley to the
Countess of Lincoln, written in March 1631, is the
earliest complete printing of the text. It appeared in the New
Hampshire Historical Collections, volume 4 (1834), pages
224-249. It was also issued separately in Concord, N.H., by
Marsh, Capen and Lyon that same year.
Approximately three-quarters of the letter had previously
appeared in 1696, in the volume published in Boston titled
Massachusetts, or The First Planters, possibly compiled and
edited by Joshua Scottow.
This present text was printed from a manuscript
discovered "by one of the Publishing Committee" bound in a
copy of Edward Johnson's Wonder-Working Providence and
Edward Winslow's New England Salamander Discovered. The
editor of this text, John Farmer, suggests that this
manuscript was the printer's copy for the text printed in
1696, relating that the excerpts are marked for the printer
and correspond to the printed 1696 version.
This text of the letter was reprinted four years later (in
1838) at Washington, D.C., in volume II of Peter Force's
Tracts and Other Papers Relating Principally to the Origin,
Settlement, and Progress of the Colonies in North America,
From the Discovery of the Country to the Year 1776. Force,
however, altered and truncated the brief explanatory
passage at the start, describing the manuscript's discovery.
The letter has been printed many times since, in
numerous modernized versions.</description>

<author>Thomas Dudley</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Restoration Declensions, Divine Consolations: The Work of John Foxe in 1664 Massachusetts</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow/8</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:53:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Dr. Anne Myles, of the University of Northern Iowa, has recently published an article
describing her discovery of a previously unattributed work of Joshua Scottow: Divine
Consolations for Mourners in Sion (1664). Her excellent article is titled "Restoration
Declensions, Divine Consolations: The Work of John Foxe in 1664 Massachusetts,"
and can be found in The New England Quarterly, March 2007, Vol. 80, No. 1, Pages 35-
68. It is available online. 
She writes: "In 1664, a text appeared in New England that addressed itself to the
uncertainty of the present by once again reaching back into the past--in this case, the past
of over a century earlier--to let the dead speak. The anonymous tract, titled Divine
Consolations for Mourners in Sion, published without an imprint, has survived in only
two copies, one in the collections of the American Antiquarian Society and one at Trinity
College in Dublin. Listed in the English Short-Title Catalog but never included in
Evans's Early American Imprints, Divine Consolations has apparently gone entirely
unnoticed in the history of Puritan scholarship. While the tract is clearly problematic in
matters of attribution and publication, it also has much to offer us as we seek to
understand the mentality of 1660s Massachusetts and the history of the book in early
America. Comprised of a preface directed toward the people of Boston and New
England, followed by an extract that reprints the section of John Foxe's Acts and
Monuments related to the examination and letters of Marian martyr John Careless,
combined with several letters from other Protestant martyrs, Divine Consolations is by
far the first publication in America of any portion of the work best known as the Book of
Martyrs; more than that, it seems to represent the first occasion on which material
previously published in England--albeit an extract rather than a book proper--was
printed in New England."
In addition to building a convincing case for Scottow as "compiler" of the work, she also
discusses his translations of Guy de Brès, the checkered career of Marmaduke Johnson,
the micro-politics of 1660s Massachusetts, martyrology, and Quakerism.
Highly recommended.</description>

<author>Anne Myles</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>MASSACHUSETTS: or The first Planters of &lt;i&gt;New-England, &lt;/i&gt; The &lt;i&gt;End&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Manner&lt;/i&gt; of their coming thither, and Abode there: In several EPISTLES</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow/7</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:08:56 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In 1696 there appeared in Boston an anonymous 16mo volume of 56 pages containing four "epistles," written from 66 to 50 years earlier, illustrating the early history of the colony of Massachusetts Bay.
The four "epistles" compiled in Massachusetts, or The First Planters were all originally addressed to English or European audiences:
1. The Humble Request of His Majesties Loyal Subjects (1630), sent from aboard the Arbella and usually attributed to John Winthrop, defended the emigrants' physical separation from England and reaffirmed their loyalty to the Crown and Church of England.
2. Thomas Dudley's letter "To the Right Honourable, My very good
Lady, The Lady Bridget, Countess of Lincoln," written in March 1631, narrated the first year's experience of those "planters" who came over in Winthrop's fleet of 1630. It appeared in print for the first time in the Massachusetts compilation.
3. "The Preface of the Reverend Mr. John Allin, of Dedham, and of
Mr. Thomas Shepard of Cambridge in New-England, before their Defence of the Answer made unto the Nine Questions" (from 1645) was taken from a longer work on church government, and it recounted the religious reasons for--and the providential design observable in--the great migration of the Independent or Congregational churches to New England.
4. "In Domini Nortoni Librum, ad Lectorem Præfatio Apologetica," by John Cotton, was the preface to a Latin treatise (Responsio ad Totam Quæstionum Syllogen à clarissimo Viro Domino Guilielmo Apollonio) by John Norton, published in 1648 to explain and defend the Congregational system of church government as practiced in New England. Cotton's preface again
depicts the flight into exile not merely as a justifiable necessity for the continuance of the true Church, but as a stage in the history of redemption: "John ... was carried away into the wilderness that he might see more clearly not only the judgment of the great whore but also the coming down from heaven of the chaste bride of Christ, the new Jerusalem (Revelation
17:1, 3; 21:2)." An English translation of Cotton's Latin preface is supplied as an Appendix to this edition.
The compilation and publication of this volume has long been attributed to Joshua Scottow, then a retired Boston merchant and antiquary who had recently published a history of those early years--A Narrative of the Planting of the Massachusets Colony Anno 1628 (1694)--that incorporated materials found in Dudley's previously unpublished letter. Whoever its compiler, the work is interesting for its astute selection of materials, all of which reaffirm Massachusetts' original religious and theocratic mission in the face of events of the 1690s which had cost the colony a great degree of its political autonomy and social consensus of purpose, i.e. the purification of the Christian churches.
This online electronic edition includes the complete text of the 1696 printing. Some added notes identify people and references, situate the documents in their historical and disputational context, supply portions omitted by the original compiler, and discuss the textual history of the work and its component documents.</description>

<author>John Winthrop</author>


</item>




</channel>
</rss>
