Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Department of
Title
HSV Latency-Associated Transcript and Neuronal Apoptosis
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
September 2000
Abstract
Thompson and Sawtell report that
the Promega Anti-PARP p85 antibody did
not recognize cleaved PARP in mouse or
rabbit cells in their experiments, and conclude
that the results reported with this antibody
by Perng et al. (1) are an artifact. The
Promega antibody was generated against a
peptide based on the sequence of human p85.
Although the corresponding bovine sequence
differs by two amino acids, the antibody reacts
with both human and bovine p85 (2). The
mouse and rat sequences for this region of
p85 differ from the human sequence by a
single amino acid that corresponds to one of
the bovine amino acid differences. External
testers have successfully stained mouse and
rat p85 using Promega Anti-PARP p85 (2).
Thus, the negative mouse results reported by
Thompson and Sawtell are surprising, and
call into question the validity of their negative
rabbit results.
Extracts that we prepared (Fig. 1) from
rabbit skin cells induced to undergo apoptosis
by staurosporin (lane RS-S) contained a band
of approximately 85 kD that was recognized
by Anti-PARP p85, and that comigrated with
the p85 band induced in human Jurkat cells
by staurosporin (lane Jurkat-S) or anti-Fas
antibody (lane Jurkat-F). Clearly, then, the
Promega antibody recognizes the rabbit
cleaved PARP p85 protein, and the argument
to the contrary by Thompson and Sawtell has
no merit. Their negative mouse and rabbit
results apparently stemmed from technical
problems, a bad batch of antibody, or some
other unknown factor.

Comments
Published in SCIENCE VOL 289 8 SEPTEMBER 2000. Copyright 2000. Used by permission. Online at www.sciencemag.org