Abstract
Professional actors assemble a toolkit of monologues with an obligatory “Shakespearean monologue” of around 20 lines. But female actors are at a disadvantage, with less than 150 women in a repertoire of over 1,100 characters in Shakespeare’s 37 or more plays. Young female actors (18-22 years old) are even more at a loss, if the powerful and complex older female roles are removed, leaving only a few dozen appropriate speeches. What effect does this limited canon have on such actors? Here, I reflect upon my own participant observer experience as a young woman actor, who received the bulk of my early training as a student in a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Theatre: Acting and Directing program at an American university in the 1990’s. I also present research, accomplished through interviews with two other women who also played Shakespeare’s young female characters, in which they reflect on their casting, rehearsal and production experiences in the roles, as well as how their subsequent choices of theatrical work were influenced by such formative experiences. Their words point to the dual, contradictory nature of this limited canon, proving both its limitations and opportunities. Findings explore what these experiences suggest for pedagogical changes in teaching Shakespeare.
Recommended Citation
Reed, Shannon
(2015)
"Reflection: The Twenty-Line Trap? Shakespeare Enacted by Young Women,"
Dialogue: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Popular Culture and Pedagogy: Vol. 2:
Iss.
1, Article 8.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dialogue/vol2/iss1/8
Included in
American Popular Culture Commons, Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Dramatic Literature, Criticism and Theory Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, Performance Studies Commons, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Commons