Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Date of this Version

Winter 12-1-2018



Alfarani, L. A. (2015). Influences on the Adoption of Mobile Learning in Saudi Women

Teachers in Higher Education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 9(2), 58-62.

Alqahtani, M., & Mohammad, H. (2015) . Mobile Applications’ Impact on Student Performance

and Satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology, 14(4) , 102-112.

American life project (2012), retrieved 1oth december 2017

Barab, S. A.; Evans, M. A. & Baek, E.-O. (2004), 'Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit', Handbook of research on educational communications and

technology, 199-214.

Broskoske, S., & Harvey, F. (2000). Challenges faced by institutions of higher education

migrating to distance learning. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Vol. 23, pp. 37-42).

Corbeil, J., & Valdes-Corbeil, M. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? EDUCAUSE

Quarterly, 30(2), 51-58.

Croop, F. (2008). Student perceptions related to mobile learning in Higher Education (Doctoral

Dissertation).Northcentral University.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental

research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy. Retrieved 23 November 2017 from

Engeström, Y. (1991). Developmental work research: reconstructing expertise through expansive

learning. In M. Nurminen & G. Weir, (Eds.). Human jobs and computer interfaces (pp. 265-290). New York, NY: North-Hollan

Frohberg, D., Goth, C., & Schwabe, G. (2009). Mobile learning projects: a critical analysis of the

state of the art. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 307-331.

Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift

from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and

Distance Learning, 1(1), 1-17.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer

conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 2001.

George D. Kuh, J. H. Schuh, E. J. Whitt, and associates, Involving Colleges:(1991) Successful

Approaches to Fostering Student Learning and Development outside the Classroom (San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1991); Roy Romer(1995), Making Quality Count in Undergraduate Education (Denver, Colo.: Education Commission of the States. Routledge.

Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. The Quartely

Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1-11.

Hackemer, K., & Peterson, D. (2005). University of South Dakota Palm initiative. In A.

Kukulska-Hulme, & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 157-172). London: Routledge.

Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: Literature review

and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science, 1, 1-16.

Holland, Beth (2015) The 21st century Libraries: the learning common, Edutopia, School of

Library. Lucas educational foundation 2015

Ifeanyi Ukairo (2013) Encouraging mobile Learning in ACOCOED, Newsletter (june2013) 4p.

Jonassen, D. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered

learning environments. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations

of learning environments (pp. 89-121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,


Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing

constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 48 (1), 1999.

Kang, H. & Gyorke. A. (2008). Rethinking distance learning activities: A comparison of

transactional distance theory and activity theory. Open Learning, 23(3), 203–214.

Keegan, D. (2002). The Future of Learning: From eLearning to mLearning. 172 pages,


Kim, S. H., Mims, C., & Holmes, K. (2006). An introduction to current trends and benefits of

mobile wireless technology use in higher education. AACE Journal, 14(1), 77-100.

Koole, M. 2006. Framework for the rational analysis of mobile education (FRAME): A model

for evaluating mobile learning devices. Thesis, Centre for Distance Education, Athabasca University.

K. Brodsky and S. Toczyski,(2002) “Information Competence in the Freshman Interest Group at Sonoma State University,” paper presented at the First Year Experience Conference, Orlando

Kuh, G., and R. Andreas. "It's About Time: Using Qualitative Methods in Student Life Studies," Journal of College Student Development, 32 (1991): 397-405.

Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction

research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-

computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality (M. J. Hall Trans.). Englewood

Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Mattmiller, B. (2005). Student survey shows surging demand for wireless access. University of

Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved March 9, 2010 (

Marcia Devlin & Gayani Samarawickrema (2010) The criteria of effective teaching in a

changing higher education context, Higher Education Research & Development, 29:2, 111-124, DOI: 10.1080/07294360903244398

Messinger, J. (2012). M-learning An exploration of the attitudes and perceptions of high school

students versus teachers regarding the current and future use of mobile devices for learning (Doctoral dissertation). Pepperdine University. Retrieved from

Moore, M. G. (2007). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of

distance education (pp. 89-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Moore, M. G. (1997). Theroy of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical

principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). NY: Routlege Studies in Distance


Peters, K. (2007). M-Learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future.

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2).

Ronda Zelezny-Green(2012) The Role of Girls’ Mobile Phone Use to Increase Access to

Educational Content After School: A Capabilities-Based Evaluation in Nairobi, Royal Holloway, University of London

Roth, W-M. & Lee, Y-J. (2007). ‘Vygotsky’s neglected legacy’: Cultural historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186-232.

Saba, F., Shearer (1994). Distance education theory, methodology, and epistemology: A

pragmatic paradigm. In Moore, M.G., & Anderson, W.G. (eds.). Handbook of distance education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007) A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age. In R. Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite (eds.)The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research. London: Sage, pp. 221-47.

Steve Vosloo: Riitta Vanska (2011): you don't need smartphones for mobile learning. What is

important is affordability and scalability

Taylor, Josie; Sharples, Mike; O’Malley, Claire; Vavoula, Giasemi and Waycott, Jenny (2006). Towards a task model for mobile learning: a dialectical approach. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2/3) pp. 138–158.

Uden, L. (2005) Activity theory for designing mobile learning , Department of Computing, Engineering and Technology, Staffordshire University, in Int. J. Mobile Learning and Organisation, Vol. x, No. x, xxxx

UNESCO. (2011). UNESCO mobile learning week report. Paris, France: UNESCO HQ Pew

Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project. (2012). In Forty-six percent of American adults are smartphone owners. Washington, D.C.: Smith.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Wagner, E. (2005). Enabling mobile learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(3), 40-52.

Watson, Rod and Coulter, Jeff. 2008. “The debate over cognitivism” Theory, Culture & Society

25(2): 1-17

Winters, N. (2007). What is mobile learning? Big Issues in Mobile Learning. Nottingham:

Learning Science Research Institute at the University of Nottingham. Retrieved April 25,

2014,http://mlearning.noekaleidoscope.or/public/news/KALEIDOSCOPE%20REPORT_ 07_Big_Issues_In_Mobile_Learning.pdf



Zurita, G. and Nussbaum, M. 2007. A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for

mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology 38(2): 211-235.



With the influx of new technologies in the world, learning is becoming more interesting than ever before. The study was conducted to access the adoption of mobile learning in Nigeria. Three objectives and three research questions were formulated to guide the researcher. 200, 300 and 400 levels of College of Natural and Applied Sciences and College of Social Sciences were the study population. The sampled population was 83 respondents which is the 10% of the entire population. Structured questioner was the instrument used for data collection. It was discovered that smart phones and laptops were the mobile technologies preferred for mobile learning. It was also discovered that mobile technologies enhance learning but the adoption in Nigeria educational system has been hindered by lots of challenges. Conclusion was made on the need for educators, curriculum designers/ planners, librarians etc, to promote the use of mobile technology for rendering and extending academic services that is education 2.0, library 2.0 and web2.0 to be incorporated into the school curriculum. It was also recommended that similar study should be carried out to identify the readiness of educators, teachers/ librarians towards adopting mobile learning into Nigeria educational system.