Date of this Version
Aryanti, B., & Willet, p. (2008). Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 2001 - 2006: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Jpuyrnal of Library and Information Science, 13(1), 103 - 116.
Awasthi, S. (2015, September). Library Trends Journal: A Bibliometric Study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(9). Retrieved from www,ijsrp.org
Bignold, W., Bamber, P., Guilherme, A., Rao, N., Su, F., & Yuan, T. (2013). Teaching the Desciplines in Education Studies. York, United Kingdom: Higher Education Academy.
Biswas, B. C., Roy, A., & Sen, B. K. (2007). Economic Botany: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 12(1), 23 - 33.
Chaurasia, K. K. (2008). Bibliometric Analysis of Annals of Library and Information Science (2002 - 2006). Proceedings in MANLIMBNET 9th Anual National Convention. New Delhi. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.ner/10760/11756
Connaway, L. S., & Powel, R. R. (2010). Basic Research Methods for Librarians, 5th Edition. Santa Barbara, Califonia, America: Libraries Unlimited.
Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2014). Beyond Bibliometrics: harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
Dauphinee, L., Peipert, J. F., Phipps, M., & Weitzen, S. (2005). Research Methodology and Analytic Techiques in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 106(4), 808 - 812.
Dechiel, D. (2016, March 1). Dynamic Research Support for Academic Libraries. Scitus Academics Llc .
Giske, J. (2008, January 4). Benefiting from Bibliometry. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 79 - 81. doi:10.3354/esep00075
Hjorland, B. (2011, January). The Imortance of Knowledge : Indexing and Information Retrirval as an Example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 72 - 77. doi:DOI:10.1002/asi
Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2006). Bibliometrics in Social Work (Haworth social care in health care). Oxford, New York: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2003). Seif-citation and Self-reference: Credibility and Promotion in Academic Publication. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 54(3), 251 - 259.
Jena, L. K., Swain , D. K., & Sahoo, K. C. (2012). Annals of Library and Information Studies, 2002 - 2010: A Bibliometric Study. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from http://unllib.unl.edu/LPP/
Jimoh, I. F., Eshiemokhai, E., & Hambali, Z. S. (2014). Bibliometric Analysis of Internal Journal of Research in Education 2004 - 2012. Information and Knowledge Management, 4(12), 42 - 48.
Khaparde, V. S. (2011). E- Journal of Library and Information Science: A Bibliometric Study. Internal Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(11), 99 - 106.
Lijina, P. (2018, January - March). Bibliometric Study of International Journal of Library and Information Science. 8(1), 189 - 196.
Narang, A. (2004). Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics: A bibliometric Study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 51(1), 28 - 38.
Omotayo, B. O. (2004). A Content Analysis of Ife Psychologia, 1993 - 2002. The International Information and Library Review, 36, 95 - 103.
Raja, T., & Murugan, K. (2015, July - September). Bibliometric Study of Research and Reflections on Education. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science, 4(3), 228 - 232.
Reed, M. (2015). The Research Impact Handbook. Aberdeenshire: Fast Track Impact Ltd.
Roemer, R. C., & Borchardt, R. (2015). Meaningful metrics: a 21st century Librarian's guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics and research impact. Chicago. Illinois: ACRL.
Singh, G., Mittal, R., & Ahmad, M. (2007). A Bibliometric Study of Literature on Digital Libraries. The Electronic Library, 25(3), 342 - 348.
Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric Studies of Research Collaboration: A Review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33 - 38.
Swain, D. K., Swain, C., & Rautaray, B. (2014, April - June). Bib liometric Analysis of the Journal Business Economics from 2008 - 2013. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 4(2), 93 - 108. Retrieved from www,ijodls.in
Tella, A., & Olabooye, A. (2014). Bibliometric Analysis of African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science from 2000 - 2012. Library Review, 63(4/5), 305 - 323. Retrieved from httpS://doi.org/10.1108/LR-07-2013-0094
Tiew, W. S., Abrizah, A., & Kaur, k. (2002). Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 1996 - 2000: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 6(2), 43 - 56.
Todeschini, R., & Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative tools for studying and evaluating research. Weinhein, Germany: Wiley VCH.
Willet, P. (2007). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 26, 602 - 606.
Young, A. P. (2006). Library Quarterly, 1956 - 2004: An Exploratory Bibliometric Analysis. Library Quarterly, 76(1), 10 - 18.
Although several bibliometric journal studies on education have been carried out, surprisingly, no bibliometric study has been carried out on the Journal of Higher Education Management (JHEM), being the foremost journal for university administrators. This study is therefore an attempt to fill this gap in the context of bibliometric analysis of single journals. The purpose of this bibliometric study was to examine the publication characteristics and developments of JHEM over an eight (8) year period from 2007 to 2016. The following bibliometric measures were analysed in this study: (a) productivity of articles, (b) productivity of authors, (c) degree of author collaboration, (d) listings of core authors, (e) Institution and country affiliations of authors, (e) types of sources cited by researchers, (f) timeliness of sources cited by researchers, (g) rank list of frequently cited journal titles and (h) rank list of frequently cited authors (i) to identify the types of sources cited by authors in JHEM. The results revealed a total of 83 articles and 1,821 citations within the period of study. Single authors had the highest number of papers with 54% of the total number of papers and degree of collaboration ranged between 0.14 – 0.67. The Journal of Higher Education was the most sighted journal with a total of 27 citations. In addition, the results revealed that JHEM had a low self-citation with a total of 7 citations out of the total number of citations. The findings suggests that JHEM needs to increase its indexed databases, in order to boost awareness of the journal, there is also need for multidisciplinary collaborations to encourage a wide variety of authorship. Also, the number of annual issues should be increased from the current single annual issue to enable the publication of more articles.