Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Date of this Version

3-5-2020

Citation

  1. https://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/?utm_source=home&utm_medium=dropdown&utm_campaign=menu
  2. https://aacrjournals.org/site/Info/impact_factor.xhtml
  3. Agatha Santos do Nascimento, Oliveira FS de, Bianconi ML. Bibliometric Analysis of the Brazilian Periodical “Journal of Biochemistry Education.” M Lucia Bianconi. 2019; 47(3):249–56.
  4. Vijayakumar P, Sivasubraminiyan G, Saraswati Rao M. Publication Output of Journal “Veterinary World” (2008-2017)  : A Bibliometric Analysis. Libr Philos Pract. 2019 ;( May):2400.
  5. Coimbra DR, Dominski FH, Correia CK, Andrade A. SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN SPORTS SCIENCE JOURNALS : BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Rev Bras Med do Esporte. 2019; 25(1):88–93.
  6. Xie J, Gong K, Cheng Y, Ke Q. The correlation between paper length and citations : a Meta ‑ analysis. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2019; 118(3):763–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03015-0
  7. Darko A, Chan APC, Huo X, Estate R, Hong T, Polytechnic K, et al. A scientometric analysis and visualization of global green building research. Build Environ [Internet]. 2019; 149(November 2018):501–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.059
  8. YU D, XU Z, ANTUCHEVIČIENĖ J. BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT BETWEEN 2008 AND 2018. J Civ Eng Manag. 2019; 25(5):402–10.
  9. Mnzava E, Chirwa MN. A bibliometric analysis of the Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Science (1998-2017). Libr Philos Pract. 2019 ;( May):2322.
  10. Saberi MK, Barkhan S, Hamzehei R. A Bibliometric Study and Visualization of Library Philosophy and Practice during 1998-2018. Libr Philos Pract. 2019 ;( May):2565.
  11. Yu L, Wang G, Marcouiller DW. A scientometric review of pro-poor tourism research : Visualization and analysis Criteria / Method. Tour Manag Perspect [Internet]. 2019; 30(February):75–88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.02.005
  12. Kabongo J. Twenty Years of the Journal of African Business : A Bibliometric Analysis. J African Bus [Internet]. 2019; 20(2):269–82.
  13. Zhong B, Wu H, Li H, Sepasgozar S, Luo H, He L. A scientometric analysis and critical review of construction related ontology. Autom Constr [Internet]. 2019; 101(January):17–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.013
  14. Luo T, Tan Y, Langston C, Xue X. Mapping the knowledge roadmap of low carbon building : A scientometric analysis. Energy Build J. 2019; 194:163–76.
  15. Wuni IY, Shen GQP, Osei-kyei R. Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy Build [Internet]. 2019; 190:69–85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.010
  16. Guzeller CO, Celiker N. Bibliometrical analysis of Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. Asia Pacific J Tour Res. 2018; 24(1):108–20.
  17. Muthukrishnan M, Senthilkumar R. Mapping of Publications Productivity on Annals of Surgical Oncology 2005-2017 : A Study Based on Clarivate Analytics - Web of Science Database. Asian J Inf Sci Technol. 2018; 8(August):21–5.
  18. Chen, C. (2006) CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. JASIST, 57(3), 359-377.
  19. Chen, C. (2004) Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive Knowledge Domain Visualization. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 101(Suppl.), 5303-5310.
  20. Vijayakumar P, Sivasubraminiyan G, Saraswati Rao M. Publication Output of Journal ‘Veterinary World’ (2008-2017)  : A Bibliometric Analysis. Libr Philos Pract. 2019 ;( May):2400.
  21. Saberi MK, Barkhan S, Hamzehei R. A Bibliometric Study and Visualization of Library Philosophy and Practice during 1998-2018. Libr Philos Pract. 2019;(May):2565.

Abstract

The paper analysis, authorship productivity and collaborative research of research articles available on Clinical Cancer Research for a period of fourteen years from 2005 to 2018. The data were downloaded from the Clarivate Analytics - web of science database. The data included fourteen thousand one hundred fifty six (14156) research articles and sixty eight thousand one hundred seventy (68170) authors. This paper analysis the co-authorship network using CiteSpace Java application with the aim of the understanding of research collaboration in this journal. This paper test the appropriateness of relative growth rate and doubling time.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.