Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Date of this Version

Spring 3-11-2020

Document Type



  1. Price, Derek J deSolla. Little science, Big science. New York, Columbia press, 1963, 78.
  2. Yadav, Sunil Kumar, Singh, S N and Verma, Manoj Kumar. Authorship and Collaboration Pattern in SRELS Journal of Information Management during 2008-2017: An Evaluation. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 2019. (accessed on 25 Nov 2019).
  3. Mondal, Dhiman, and Jana, Sibsankar. Collaborative authorship trend in leading Indian LIS journals. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2018, 38(5), 320-325. (accessed on 13 Nov 2019).
  4. Siamaki, S., Geraei, E., and Zare-Farashbandi, F. A study on scientific collaboration and co-authorship patterns in library and information science studies in Iran between 2005 and 2009. Journal of education and health promotion, 2014, 3, 99. (accessed on 23 Oct 2019).
  5. Lawani, S., Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: A bibliometric study. Ph.D. dissertation. Florida, Florida State University, 1980, 395.
  6. Subramanyam, K. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, 1983, 6, 33-38.
  7. Ajiferuke, I., Burell, Q., and Tague, J. Collaborative coefficient: a single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 1988, 14(5–6), 421–433. (accessed on 19 Nov 2019).
  8. Savanur, K., and Srikanth, R. Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2), 365–371. (accessed on 4 Nov 2019).
  9. Mahapatra, G. Correlation between growth of publications and citations: A study based on growth curves. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 1994, 41(1), 8-12.
  10. Beaie, S. T., & Acol, P. Population and demographic measures: Concepts and definitions for basic MDG indicators. Kingston Georgetown, Guyana: Bureau of Statistics, 2009.


The present study is an attempt to evaluate the authorship and collaboration pattern in IASLIC bulletin during the year 2011-2018. Total 162 articles published during the study period and out of which only 59 articles are published by single author and rest 103 articles are published by two or more than two authors. So it is clear from the study that multiple authorship patterns are prominent in the journal. In the study it has been counted that the average collaboration index is 1.76, average degree of collaboration is 0.64, average collaboration coefficient is 0.56, and average modified collaboration coefficient is 0.34, average relative growth rate is 0.25 and average doubling time is 2.92 during the year 2011-2018.