Examining the Nuance in Public Opinion of Pro-LGB Policies in a "Red State."

Authors

Mathew Stange, Mathematica Policy Research, Ann Arbor, MIFollow
Emily Kazyak, University of Nebraska–LincolnFollow

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2015

Citation

Stange, Mathew and Emily Kazyak. 2015. “Examining the Nuance in Public Opinion of Pro-LGB Policies in a "Red State." Sexuality Research & Social Policy. DOI: 10.1007/s13178-015-0213-x

Comments

Copyright © 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York. Used by permission.

Abstract

The red-blue state and urban–rural narratives— which depict that people living in red states and rural areas oppose pro-LGB policies—are popular frames for describing variation in public opinion of LGB policies by geographic re- gion. In a test case of a red state, we examine public opinion of pro-LGB policies to assess the accuracy of the red–blue and urban–rural narratives. Using data from a survey of Nebraskans (n = 1608), we found that public opinion was more nuanced than the red state narrative allows but that urban and rural respondents reported significantly different opinions of pro- LGB policies. Rural people, however, were not unsupportive of all pro-LGB policies. Among all Nebraskans, support was higher for policies to protect LGB people from housing and job discrimination while support was lower for marriage and adop- tion rights. We discuss what these findings mean for public policy, urban and rural LGB individuals, and future public opinion studies of LGB issues.