Sociology, Department of

 

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

Winter 2021

Citation

The Journal of Rural Health 37:1 (Winter 2021), pp. 5–15.

doi: 10.1111/jrh.12497

Comments

Copyright © 2020 National Rural Health Association. Published by Wiley. Used by permission.

Abstract

Purpose: While research has been done comparing rural/urban differences in opioid prescribing to the disabled Medicare Part D population, research on opioid prescribing among the aged Medicare Part D population is lacking. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring the predictors of opioid prescribing to aged Medicare Part D beneficiaries and investigating whether these predictors vary across rural and urban areas. Methods: This is an analysis of ZIP Codes in the continental United States (18,126 ZIP Codes) utilizing 2017 data from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The analytic approach includes aspatial descriptive analysis, exploratory spatial analysis with geographically weighted regression, and explanatory analysis with spatial error regime modeling. Findings: Both beneficiary and prescriber characteristics play an important role in determining opioid prescribing rates in urban ZIP Codes, but most of them fail to explain the opioid prescribing rates in rural ZIP Codes. Conclusion: We identify potential spatial nonstationarity in opioid prescribing rates, indicating the complex nature of opioid-related issues. This means that the same stimulus may not lead to the same change in opioid prescribing rates because the change may be place specific. By understanding the rural/urban differences in the predictors of opioid prescribing, place-specific policies can be developed that can guide more informed opioid prescribing practices and necessary interventions.

Share

COinS