Breeding for end-use quality: Reflections on the Nebraska experience

Authors

P. Stephen Baenziger, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
D. R. Shelton, Wheat Marketing Center
M. J. Shipman, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
R. A. Graybosch, USDA-ARSFollow

ORCID IDs

P. Stephen Baenziger

Date of this Version

6-2-2001

Comments

Published in Euphytica 119: 95–100, 2001. Copyright © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Used by permission.

Abstract

Every cultivar released in Nebraska must have four characteristics: improved agronomic performance relative to existing cultivars, exceptional winterhardiness, resistance to Puccinia graminis (the causal agent of stem rust), and acceptable end-use quality. This paper will discuss our strategy for breeding cultivars with acceptable end-use quality. All experimental lines are derived from crosses with at least one or more parents with acceptable enduse quality. As soon as individual lines are identified (F₅) generation, microquality analyses are conducted and approximately 10% are discarded on the basis of poor end-use quality. In the F 6 and later generations, samples are composited from three or more locations/year, milled on a Buhler Mill, and baked using 100 g of flour per loaf. Though genotype-by-environmental interactions are large for end-use quality traits, composite samples are satisfactory for determining the end-use quality when repeated over time. By using phenotypic selection, the program has released cultivars with acceptable quality involving known ‘poor’ quality genes and chromosomes, such as high-molecular weight (HMW) glutenin subunits 2+12 (Scout 66 and Lancota), 1BL.1RS (heterogeneous in Rawhide and homogeneous in Cougar), and 1AL.1RS (heterogeneous in Nekota and Niobrara). Phenotypic selection is preferred to genotypic selection.