Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Vol. 59, No. 4

Authors

Eve M. Brank, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
David Dreyer, Indiana Superior Court
David Prince, Colorado State District Court

Date of this Version

2023

Citation

Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association (2023) 59(4): 145-196

Editors: Professor Eve Brank, University of Nebraska; Judge David Dreyer, Indiana Superior Court; Judge David Prince, Colorado State District Court

Cite as: 59 Ct. Rev. ___ (2023)

Comments

Used by permission.

Abstract

Articles

The Role of the Judge in Establishing a VTC, Mishkat Al Moumin, Judge Gayle Williams-Byers, and Amber Menchio

Prospective Jurors’ Attitudes Toward Voir Dire, Wendy P. Heath and Bruce D. Grannemann

Constitutional Losses and (Some) Statutory Wins for Criminal Defendants: Select Criminal Law and Procedure Cases from the Supreme Court’s 2022-23 Term, Eve Brensike Primus and Mark Rucci

Departments

Editor’s Note, David Prince

President’s Column: The American Judges Association--Making Better Judges Since 1959, and Continuing to Lead the Way! Catherine Carlson

Thoughts from Canada: Publication Bans--The Supreme Court of Canada Considers Their Impact Upon the Conflict between the Open Court Principle and the Right to a Fair Trial, Wayne K. Gorman

Crossword: Mental Oxymoron, Vic Fleming

Canon Conversations: Constructive Criticism, Cynthia Gray

The American Judges Association Honors Judges, Others, during Annual Conference (2023)

The Resource Page: Ethics of ChatGPT Advocacy; NCSC Data Dives

Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of unsolicited, original articles, essays, and book reviews. Court Review seeks to provide practical, useful information to the working judges of the United States and Canada. In each issue, we hope to provide information that will be of use to judges in their everyday work, whether in highlighting new procedures or methods of trial, court, or case management, providing substantive information regarding an area of law likely to be encountered by many judges, or by providing background information (such as psychology or other social science research) that can be used by judges in their work. Guidelines for the submission of manuscripts for Court Review are set forth on page 187 of this issue. Court Review reserves the right to edit, condense, or reject material submitted for publication.