American Judges Association

 

Date of this Version

2022

Citation

Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association (2022) 58(4):

Editors: Professor Eve Brank, University of Nebraska; Judge David Dreyer, Indiana Superior Court; Judge David Prince, Colorado State District Court

Cite as: 58 Ct. Rev. ___ (2022)

Comments

Used by permission

Abstract

Interview

Stresses of the Job in Modern Times: Coaching Resilience in Judges, Peer-to-Peer, an Interview with Jan Bouch; David Prince

Articles

Prosecutorial Misconduct: Assessment of Perspectives from the Bench, Saul M. Kassin, Stephanie A. Cardenas, Vanessa Meterko, and Faith Barksdale

Limiting Access to Remedies: Select Criminal Law and Procedure Cases from the Supreme Court’s 2021-22 Term, Eve Brensike Primus and Justin Hill

You Can Change Judging and Justice, Thomas R. French

The Online Courtroom: Leveraging Remote Technology in Litigation American Bar Association, Tort, Trial, and Insurance Practice Section, J. Gary Hastings

Departments

Editor’s Note, Eve Brank, David Dreyer, and David Prince

President’s Column, Yvette Mansfield Alexander

Canon Conversations:Constructive Criticism, Cynthia Gray

Thoughts from Canada: The Use of a Complainant’s Prior Sexual Activity to Support the Defence of Consent in Sexual Assault Trials, the Canadian Approach, Wayne K. Gorman

Crossword: Looking Up, Vic Fleming

The Resource Page: Resolving Unsettled Questions of State Law: A Pocket Guide for Federal Judges; Unbundled Legal Services; Procedural Fairness--The Power of Dignity; Courtroom Interpretation; Let's Keep Talking: We Want Your Feedback

Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of unsolicited, original articles, essays, and book reviews. Court Review seeks to provide practical, useful information to the working judges of the United States and Canada. In each issue, we hope to provide information that will be of use to judges in their everyday work, whether in highlighting new procedures or methods of trial, court, or case management, providing substantive information regarding an area of law likely to be encountered by many judges, or by providing background information (such as psychology or other social science research) that can be used by judges in their work. Guidelines for the submission of manuscripts for Court Review are set forth on page 195 of this issue. Court Review reserves the right to edit, condense, or reject material submitted for publication.

Share

COinS