Department of Chemistry
Date of this Version
October 1995
Abstract
Disagreement in the ordering of relative magnitudes of the elastic constants of phenothiazine with those of Ecolivet et al. is resolved. Dubious methodologies and assumptions employed by Ecolivet et al. in their measurements, approximations, and arguments [C. Ecolivet et al., Phys. Rev. B 44, 4185 (1991)] are noted. Samples employed by these investigators in both their ultrasonic and Brillouin measurements are shown to exhibit properties consistent with impure samples and inconsistent with those of Sartwell and Eckhardt.
Comments
Published by Am Physical Soc. Phys. Rev. B 52, 10635 - 10636 (1995). Copyright 1995. Permission to use. http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v52/p10635.