Off-campus UNL users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your NU ID and password. When you are done browsing please remember to return to this page and log out.

Non-UNL users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Employee perceptions of collaborative leadership/management in higher education institutions

Keith A Butler, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Abstract

The purpose of this concurrent nested mixed methods study was to measure specific collaborative leadership/management supervisory behaviors in existence in selected departments at several U.S. higher education institutions as perceived by organizational members. Measures of collaborative leadership/management were compared by employee type at each institution (staff and administration), between and among departments/divisions at institutions, and between employee types and departments/divisions at different higher education institutions. Collaboration as researched in this study consisted of three main components: strong communication (vertically in both directions as well as horizontally), open access to quality information necessary for decision-making processes, and distribution of responsibility for decision-making to lower levels of the administrative hierarchy. A modified version of the Survey of Organizations (Taylor & Bowers, 1972) was utilized to measure collaboration, and the survey instrument was distributed electronically to employees in two selected departments/divisions at each of three higher education institutions with an overall response rate of 30.7% (N = 170). ^ Findings included qualitative, quantitative and departmental/divisional results. The main quantitative results were: (1) that collaborative leadership/management behaviors were in existence at the research sites, and similarities between staff and administrative employees, as well as between departments and higher education institutions, outweighed comparative differences; and (2) through exploratory factor analysis two superfactors were developed, Supervisor Interaction/Communication and Peer Interaction. The main qualitative result was an elaboration of the theory of collaboration finding Communication, along with the subcategories of Meetings, Formal/Informal Communication and Input, is a moderating factor for collaboration. Departmental/Divisional descriptive data yielded mostly similarities as well, in that little history of CL/M efforts was in existence. Future research directions including comparisons with corporate environments are suggested.^

Subject Area

Education, Administration|Education, Higher

Recommended Citation

Keith A Butler, "Employee perceptions of collaborative leadership/management in higher education institutions" (January 1, 2007). ETD collection for University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Paper AAI3255221.
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3255221

Share

COinS