Off-campus UNL users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your NU ID and password. When you are done browsing please remember to return to this page and log out.
Non-UNL users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.
A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF THE FORTY WASHINGTON TRIP WINNERS IN THE THIRTY-NINTH ANNUAL WESTINGHOUSE SCIENCE TALENT SEARCH, THEIR SPONSORING TEACHERS, THEIR SCHOOLS, THE SCIENCE CURRICULA OF THEIR SCHOOLS, AND THEIR PROJECTS
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to collect demographic, attitudinal, and other information about the forty Washington Trip Winners in the Thirty-ninth Annual Westinghouse Science Talent Search, their sponsoring teachers, their schools, the science curricula of their schools, and their projects. This information, along with recommendations from the winners and the sponsoring teachers was used to develop a set of recommendations to help science teachers provide their students with the opportunity to conduct quality research and develop good research skills. The information was collected by questionnaires mailed to the Washington Trip Winners and their sponsoring teachers. 87.5 percent of the students and 70.0 percent of the teachers responded. It was found that the Washington Trip Winners were all good students with high grade point averages, class ranks, and SAT scores. Almost all planned to major in science or mathematics in college. Most had previous successful science fair experience and came from well-educated families. Nearly half had at least one parent whose occupation was science or math oriented. The sponsoring teachers were all "veteran" teachers with nine or more years of teaching experience. Most held Master's degrees or higher and about half reported having research experience in either high school or college. Their primary role in the students' research was resource person or inspirer/encourager. Nearly all of the students came from schools of 1,000 or more students. Most of the schools were public schools with a 9-12 organizational structure. Nine of the forty winners came from special public schools (i.e. gifted/science/magnet). Science enrollments in the schools were generally high percentage-wise. The average annual science budget for the schools was $5,743. All schools offered basic courses in biology, chemistry, and physics and most offered advanced courses in these subjects. Less than half of the schools offered formal research courses or had independent research facilities. Most of the schools had entrants in the Science Talent Search every year. Twelve schools had previous winners. The primary sources of Westinghouse project ideas were National Science Foundation Secondary Science Training Programs and scientific books and journals. Resource people such as university researchers played important roles in the research of most of the students. The winners and their sponsoring teachers were asked to give advice for students and teachers who might be interested in participating in future Westinghouse Science Talent Searches. Lists of their recommendations were compiled. These recommendations were used to develop a set of guidelines to assist science teachers in providing their talented science students an opportunity to conduct quality research and develop good research skills.
Subject Area
Science education
Recommended Citation
THOMPSON, GARY LEE, "A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF THE FORTY WASHINGTON TRIP WINNERS IN THE THIRTY-NINTH ANNUAL WESTINGHOUSE SCIENCE TALENT SEARCH, THEIR SPONSORING TEACHERS, THEIR SCHOOLS, THE SCIENCE CURRICULA OF THEIR SCHOOLS, AND THEIR PROJECTS" (1980). ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI8105848.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI8105848