Off-campus UNL users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your NU ID and password. When you are done browsing please remember to return to this page and log out.
Non-UNL users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.
A critical rhetorical analysis of three responses to white supremacy
Abstract
This dissertation provides a critical rhetorical analysis of three community-based human rights advocacy agencies as they respond to white supremacist activism in contemporary America. A critical perspective on rhetoric directs attention to the ideological commitments that undergird discourse, and to the implications of those ideological commitments on groups' response. Three ideological positions are examined. The classic liberal view, exemplified by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, discusses responses to white supremacy in terms of individual freedoms and the marketplace of ideas. This study argues that a classic liberal ideology severely constrains a group's ability to respond effectively to white supremacy. The revisionist liberal view, exemplified by the Southern Poverty Law Center, advocates some restrictions on individual liberty as a way for different groups to live together in a diverse society. This study argues that criminal and civil actions, while effective in the short term, do not address the fundamental causes of white supremacy. The radical view of white supremacy, exemplified by the Center for Democratic Renewal, argues that white supremacy arises from structural racism in society. The radical analysis is appealing intellectually, but has limited appeal in the community.
Subject Area
Communication|Minority & ethnic groups|Sociology
Recommended Citation
Sobnosky, Matthew James, "A critical rhetorical analysis of three responses to white supremacy" (1990). ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI9118477.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI9118477