Off-campus UNL users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your NU ID and password. When you are done browsing please remember to return to this page and log out.
Non-UNL users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.
Alternative conceptions of and corrections to the tyranny of the majority: A synthesis of perspectives on the American dilemma
Abstract
In this study I provide a clarification and analysis of the conceptualizations of the tyranny of the majority from five different authors who have written about the American dilemma on four different points. James Madison, Alexis de Tocqueville, John C. Calhoun, Robert A. Dahl, and Lani Guinier are examined regarding their conceptualizations of the tyranny of the majority, their definition of tyranny, their perception of rights, and their corrections to the tyranny of the majority. From the synthesis of the four main points I identify and categorize the five main causes of the tyranny of the majority. The two root causes of majoritarian tyranny are the qualitative (social) causes of individual and group interests. The remaining quantitative (political) causes are the two-party system, winner-take-all districting, and the voting system. I conclude that the three quantitative causes of majoritarian tyranny can be nearly eliminated by the imposition of a proportional representation system. However, the qualitative causes can never be eliminated, only corrected by political means.
Subject Area
Political science|Philosophy|American history|American literature
Recommended Citation
Beahm, Donald L, "Alternative conceptions of and corrections to the tyranny of the majority: A synthesis of perspectives on the American dilemma" (1998). ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI9902944.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI9902944