History, Department of
Title
Review of Diana O'Hara, Courtship and Constraint: Rethinking the Making of Marriage in Tudor England, and Retha Warnicke, The Marrying of Anne of Cleves: Royal Protocol in Tudor England
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
Fall 2001
Abstract
There have been a number of books and articles in the last decade that focus
on family and marriage, including courtship, in early modern England or on the
negotiations of specific marriages. Many of these studies were written in response to
the pioneering but often controversial work by Lawrence Stone. Literary scholars,
such as Catherine Bates and Ilona Bell, and historians such as Barbara Harris, Sara
Mendelson and Patricia Crawford, Eric Carlson, Alan MacFarlane, and Ralph
Houlbrooke have brought a variety of view points and much more subtlety to the
whole discussion. The two books under review here, Courtship and Constraint and
The Marrying of Anne of Cleves, both demonstrate the serious scholarship and new
insights into this growing field.
The major theme of O'Hara's study is to examine the social, cultural, and economic
aspects of sixteenth-century courtship. O'Hara's research is thorough and
she gives many examples to support her assertions. O'Hara states that her study is
not directly concerned with how the religious and political changes of the sixteenth
century influenced courtship. Warnicke's study, however, is clearly
concerned with religious and political change and connects the two very different
meanings of the word court.
Both Courtship and Constraint
and The Marrying of Anne of Cleves are first rate historical studies, each of
which should gain a wide readership.
Download
Comments
Published in Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 3 (Autumn, 2001), pp. 973-975 Copyright © 2001 Renaissance Society of America; published by The University of Chicago Press. Used by permission.