U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
United States Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services: Staff Publications
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
7-1-2003
Abstract
The widespread manufacture of plastics requires the similarly ubiquitous use of plasticizers. Plasticizers such as bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DOA) and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DOP) enhance polymer strength and flexibility and are found in polymeric products such as cosmetics, detergents, and building and storage products (1). However, these additives are not bound to the polymer matrix and are subject to leaching. A recent Health Canada report warned that DOP may leach from medical devices and cause harm to infants, young boys, pregnant women, and nursing mothers (2). The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US. EPA) estimates that over 450,000 pounds of DOA were released to land and water during the period of 1987-1993 (3). Several methods exist for the determination of plasticizers in aqueous samples. For example, U.S. EPA methods 506 and 525.1 ma)) be used to analyze drinking water for DOA and DOE among other organic compounds (4,5). Extraction of the analytes from the water matrix is achieved by either liquid-liquid extraction or by passing the sample through a solid-phase extraction disk. Extracts are analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) with either photoionization (method 506) or mass spectrometric detection (MS) (method 525.1). Recently, a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method for the analysis of plasticizers in water was reported (6). Regardless of the instrumental method employed, all of these methods require sample volumes ranging from 200 to 1000 mL in addition to lengthy liquid-liquid or solid-phase extraction procedures. Furthermore, both soluble and immiscible analytes are partitioned into the organic phase and quantitated as though the entire quantity were completely soluble in the sample. Not only does the extractionless method reported here reduce the sample volume required for analysis, but it also drastically reduces the labor required to prepare the samples. .
Comments
Published by Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 27, July/August 2003.