Law, College of
Date of this Version
12-2013
Citation
Hastings Law Journal 65 (2013), pp. 211-255.
(Formerly: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2310773 )
Abstract
As soon as sperm enter a woman, so do law and politics, or so the decades-long disputes surrounding abortion suggest. Now, however, renewed debates surrounding contraceptives show legal and political interference with women’s sexual and reproductive autonomy may actually precede the sperm. This Article argues that, increasingly, women even thinking about having sex are defined socially and legally as “mothers.” Via this broad definition of who is a “mother,” the State extends its reach into women’s decision-making throughout their reproductive lifetime.
This Article argues that the State simultaneously devalues women’s choices to have sex for pleasure, which this Article calls desexualization, and uses medical rituals associated with motherhood, which this Article calls ritualization, to persuade women to accept the role of mother. Desexualization and ritualization signal the State’s attempt to influence women’s sexual and reproductive decisionmaking not only in the context of abortion but also in the areas of contraception, pregnancy, and childbirth.
(Updated December 2013)
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Family Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, Privacy Law Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons
Comments
Copyright (c) 2013 Beth A. Burkstrand-Reid