- Almind TC, Ingwersen P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to webometrics. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 404–26.
- Bakri, A. and Willett, P. (2008). The Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 2001- 2006: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 13 (1), 103-116.
- Campanario, J.M., González, L. and Rodríguez, C. (2006). Structure of the impact factor of academic journals in the ﬁeld of Education and Educational Psychology: citations from editorial board members. Scientometrics, 69(1), 37–56.
- Chuang, K.Y., Huang, Y.L. and Ho, Y.S. (2007). A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan. Scientometrics, 72 (2), 201-212.
- Cole, S., (1989). Citation and the evaluation of individual scientist. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 14 (1), 9-13.
- Garcia-Rio, F., Serrano, S., Dorgham, A., Alvarez-Sala, R., Pena, A.R., Pino, J.M., Alvarez-Sala, J.L. and Villamor, J., (2001). A bibliometric evaluation of European Union research of the respiratory system from 1987 to 1998. European Respiratory Journal, 17(6), 1175-1180.
- Khan, M. S. I., Ahmed, S. M. Z., Munshi, M. N. U., & Akhter, N. (1998). Library and information science literature in Bangladesh: a bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 3(2), 11-34.
- Khatun, A. and Ahmed, Z. A bibliometric analysis of diarrhoeal disease research in Bangladesh. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 2011, 58 (2), 109-117.
- Kumar, Manoj and Moorthy, A.L. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology during 2001-2010. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 31(3), 203-208.
- Mittal, R., Sharma, A., & Singh, G. (2006). Periodical literature on library and information science education: a bibliometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 53, 224-229.
- Moed, H.F., Burger, W.J.M., Frankfort, J.G. and Vanraan, A.F.J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14(3), 131–49.
- Narin, F., Pinski, G. and Gee, H.H. (1976). Structure of biomedical literature. Journal of the American society for Information Science, 27 (1), 24-45
- Patra, S. K., Bhattacharya, P., & Verma, N. (2006). Bibliometric study of literature on bibliometrics. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 26(1), 27-32.
- Schubert, A, Glanzel, W. and Braun, T. (1989). Scientometric dataﬁles: a comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science ﬁelds and subﬁelds 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 16 (1–6), 3-478.
- Tsay, M. (2011). A bibliometric analysis on the Journal of Information Science. Journal of Library and Information Science Research, 5(2), 1-28.
- Van, J. and Raan, A.F.J. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3 (1), 50-62.
- Vergidis, P.I., Karavasiou, A.I., Paraschakis, K., Bliziotis, I.A. and Falagas, M.E. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology; 24, 342-345.
- Verma, N. and Tamrakar, R. Analysis of contributions to Defence Science Journal. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2009, 29 (6), 39-44.
- Warraich, N. F. and Ahmed, S. (2011). Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science: A bibliometric analysis. Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science, available at http://pu.edu.pk/home/journal/8
Sambalpur Univesity (SU) was started functioning from 1st January, 1967 in the Odisha State. The university imparting study and research through 27 post-graduate departments in disciplines of Science, Humanities, Business Administration, Social Sciences, Law and Commerce. The present study aims to study the research performance of SU’s publications that have been indexed in Scopus during 2008 to 2012. The study also identifies the annual growth of university publication, authorship pattern, author productivity, degree of collaboration, length of paper published, most prolific contributor, prolific institution/ organization, geographical distribution etc. Lotka’s law of scientific productivity was used to determine the author’s productivity and Bradford’s is law used to determine scattering of literature in the publication pattern of the university during the period under study.