Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Date of this Version

Spring 6-15-2015

Document Type

Article

Citation

Ajiferuke, I., Burrel, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14, 421-433.

Andersen, H. (2010). Influence and reputation in the social sciences. How much do researchers agree? Journal of Documentation, 56, 674-692.

Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320-1326.

Bordons, M., González, B. & Díaz, A. (2013). Colaboración científica e impato de la investigación. In González, A., Gómez, J. & Agulló, V. (Coord.): La colaboracion Cientifica: una aproximación multisiciplinar (pp. 169-181). Valencia: Nau Llibres.

Cunningham, S. J., & Dillon, S. M. (1997). Authorship patterns in information systems. Scientometrics, 39(1), 19-27.

Haddow, G. & P. Genoni (2009) Australian education journals: quantitative and qualitative indicators. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 40, 88-104.

Håkanson, M. (2005) The Impact of Gender on Citations: An Analysis of College & Research Libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship, and Library Quarterly. College & Research Libraries, 66, 312-323.

Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is the collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18.

Mattesich, P.W., Murray-Close, M. & Monsey, B. R. (2001). Collaboration: what makes it work? Saint paul: Wilder Foundation.

Lawani, S. M. (1980). Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: a bibliometric study. Ph. D., Florida State University, USA.

Lemarchand, G. A. (2012). The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973-2010). Research Policy, 41, 291-305.

Maz-Machado, A., Jiménez-Fanjul, N. y Adamuz-Povedano, N. (2014). Spanish journals of education & Educational research in the JCR: A bibliometric analysis of the citations. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 1121.

Moed, H. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.

Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research perfomance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81-100.

Perianes, A., Olmeda, C. & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). Redes de colaboración científica. Análisis y visualización de patrones de coautoría. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

Rousseau, R. (2000). Are multi-authored articles cited more than single-authored ones? Are collaborations with authors from other countries more cited than collaborations within the country? A case study. Proceedings of the second Berlin workshop on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Collaboration in Science and Technology (pp. 173-176). Berlín: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung.

Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6, 33-38.

Yang, K. & J. Lee (2012) Analysis of publication patterns in Korean library and information science research. Scientometrics, 233–251.

Abstract

This article presents a bibliometric study about collaboration in the Iberoamerican journals indexed in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) within the category Information Science & Library Science. It has been found that the rate of authors per article is 2, 24, it has been calculated the collaborative index (CI) and the degree of collaboration (DC) from 2006 to 2014 and even though both CI and DC have increased, this rise has been small. Furthermore, international collaboration in the articles is minimum and almost all of it revolves around Spain.

Share

COinS