Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Document Type
Article
Citation
Agarwal, N. K. (2015). Towards a definition of serendipity in information behaviour. IR Information Research, 20(3), 1-16.
Andriaty, E. (2005). Pemanfaatan jurnal elektronis dan kemutakhiran informasi yang disitir dalam publikasi primer. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian, 14(2), 25-31.
Bungin, B. (2005). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Jakarta : Kencana.
Cahyono, H. A. (2011). Perilaku pencarian informasi: Studi kasus di Jurusan Syari’ah Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Pamekasan. (Skripsi). Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
Case, D.O. (2012), Looking for Information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing,
Conrad, L. Y. (2015). Guest post: Lettie Conrad on understanding the researcher experience. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/
Cunha, M.P. (2005), Serendipity why some organizations are luckier than others, FEUNL working paper series. Lisbon: Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Damanik, A. F., & Ari, S. (2015). Tingkat pemanfaatan e-journal clinicalkey oleh mahasiswa kedokteran di Perpustakaan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang. Jurnal Ilmu perpustakaan, 4(3), 1-8.
Djamarin, M. (2015). Pemanfaatan jurnal elektronik oleh pemustaka di perpustakaan Universitas Negeri Padang. (Skripsi). Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.
Foster, A. E., & Ellis, D. (2014). Serendipity and its study. Journal of Documentation, 70(6), 1015-1038, https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2014-0053
Foster, A. E., & Ford, N. (2007). Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical studies. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310472518
Foster, A. & Ford, N. (2003), Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study, Journal of Documentation, 59 (3), 321-340.
Hasan, T. (2013). Kajian pemanfaatan jurnal online pada perpustakaan Universitas Riau Pekanbaru. Jurnal Gema Pustakawan, 1(1), 24-35.
Imtihana, O. (2012). Perilaku pencarian informasi di kalangan profesional (Studi deskriptif terhadap Dosen Sejarah di Universitas Airlangga, Universitas Negeri Surabaya dan Universitas Negeri Malang). (Skripsi). Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
Istiana, P. (2016). Pemanfaatan e-journal oleh mahasiswa: Kajian analisis sitasi terhadap tesis mahasiswa klaster saintek Universitas Gadjah Mada. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 12(2), 150-158.
Jayanti, T. P. (2017). PERILAKU pencarian informasi Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga Surabaya. (Skripsi). Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
Line, M.B. (1974). Draft definitions: information and library needs, wants, demands and uses. Aslib Proceedings, 26(2), 87.
Makri, S., & Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across information serendipitously-Part 2: A classification framework, Journal of Documentation, 68(5), 706-724, https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411211256049
Maloney, A., & Conrad, L. Y. (2016). Expecting the unexpected: Serendipity, discovery, and the scholarly research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing. doi: 10.4135/wp160129.1.
Martin, K., & Quan-Haase, A. (2016). The role of agency in historians’ experiences of serendipity in physical and digital information environments. Journal of Documentation, 72(6).
Massis, B. E. (2011). Serendipitous: Browsing versus library space. New Library World, 112(3/4), 178-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801111117078
McCay-Peet, L., & Wells, P. G. (2017). Serendipity in the sciences: Exploring the boundaries. Nova Scotian Institute of Science, 49(1), 97-116.
McCay-Peet, L., & Toms, E. (2011). Measuring the dimensions of serendipity in digital environments. IR Information Research, 16(3), 1-6.
Merton, R.K. (1948), The bearing of empirical research upon the development of social theory. American Sociological Review, 13(5), 505-515.
Rimmer, J., Warwick, C., Blandford, A., Gow, J. & Buchanan, G. (2008), An examination of the physical and the digital qualities of humanities research. Information Processing & Management, 44(3),1374-1392.
Rubin, V.L., Burkell, J. and Quan-Haase, A. (2011), Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: a grounded theory approach to blog analysis. IR Information Research, 16(3)
Rusydi, I. (2014). Pemanfaatan e-journal sebagai media informasi digital. Jurnal Iqro’, 8(2), 200-210.
Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (1995). Metode penelitian survai. Jakarta : Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia.
Skageby, J. (2012). The irony of serendipity: disruptions in social information behaviour. Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211239988
Solomon, Y., & Bronstein, J. (2016). Serendipity in legal information seeking behavior: Chance encounters of family-law advocates with court rulings. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2015-0056
Sugiyono (2002) Statistik untuk penelitian. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194.
Ulum, A., & Setiawan, E. (2013). Kajian pemanfaatan koleksi dan layanan e-journal di Perpustakaan Universitas Surabaya. Prodising Peranan Jejaring Perpustakaan dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pustakawan, pada Konferensi Musda II FPPTI Jatim 2013. Surabaya: FPPTI Jatim.
Watson, E. A., & Fishing, G. (2008). Serendipity in library and information science. Chapel Hill: Gary Marchionini.
Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270.
Abstract
This study aims to determine the behavior of serendipity information seeking among Airlangga University lecturers in the collection of e-journal of Airlangga University library. The method used in this research is quantitative descriptive. In this case the researcher will describe serendipity in information seeking behavior, as well as see the extent to which the form of library e-journal collection is used. The object of this research is among lecturers in the Airlangga University environment. Serendipity in information search behavior of e-journal collection is supported by the experience of lecturers in conducting information searches, as well as support from the e-journal system itself. The results of this study indicate that serendipity information on information search behavior belongs to the high category. Research on information seeking behavior has been carried out a lot, but serendipity research on information seeking behavior is still very rarely done, especially in Indonesia, there is still no research related to it.