The Use of Performance Measurement in Universities of Pakistan

Authors

Muhammad Tanveer, Binary University, MalaysiaFollow
Asif Mahbub Karim Dr., Binary University MalaysiaFollow

Document Type

Article

Citation

References

Arena, M., Azzone, G. & Bengo, I., 2015. Performance measurement for social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), pp. 649-672.

Arena, M., Azzone, G. & Bengo, I., 2015. Performance measurement for social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), pp. 649-672.

Arena, M., Azzone, G. & Bengo, I., 2015. Performance measurement for social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), pp. 649-672.

Bai, C. & Sarkis, J., 2014. Determining and applying sustainable supplier key performance indicators. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), pp. 275-291.

Baird, K., 2017. The effectiveness of strategic performance measurement systems. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(1), pp. 3-21.

Bedoui, H., 2015. Multidimensional Metrics For Measuring Social And Sustainable Finance Performance. ACRN Oxford Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives Special Issue of Social and Sustainable Finance, 4(4), pp. 109-128.

Bhattacharya, A. et al., 2014. Green supply chain performance measurement using fuzzy ANP-based balanced scorecard: a collaborative decision-making approach. Production Planning & Control, 25(8), pp. 698-714.

Bhattacharya, A. et al., 2014. Green supply chain performance measurement using fuzzy ANP-based balanced scorecard: a collaborative decision-making approach. Production Planning & Control, 25(8), pp. 698-714.

Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Ates, A. & Nudurupati, S., 2015. Value of maturity models in performance measurement. International journal of production research, 53(10), pp. 3062-3085.

Connelly, P. & McColl, D., 2016. Wound dressings and performance measurement of such dressings. U.S. Patent .

Genovese, A., Lenny Koh, S., Kumar, N. & Tripathi, P., 2014. Exploring the challenges in implementing supplier environmental performance measurement models: a case study. Production Planning & Control, 25(13-14), pp. 1198-1211.

Kallio, K. & Kallio, T., 2014. Management-by-results and performance measurement in universities–implications for work motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), pp. 574-589.

Kallio, K., Kallio, T. & Grossi, G., 2017. Performance measurement in universities: ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators. Public Money & Management, 37(4), pp. 293-300.

Kearney, R., 2018. Public sector performance: management, motivation, and measurement. Routledge.

Kearney, R., 2018. Public sector performance: management, motivation, and measurement. routledge.

Kim, J. & Bryan, J., 2017. A first step to a conceptual framework of parent empowerment: Exploring relationships between parent empowerment and academic performance in a national sample. Journal of Counseling & Development, 95(2), pp. 168-179.

Laihonen, H. & Mäntylä, S., 2017. Principles of performance dialogue in public administration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(5), pp. 414-428.

Landy, F., Zedeck, S. & Cleveland, J. e., 2017. Performance measurement and theory. Taylor & Francis.

Landy, F., Zedeck, S. & Cleveland, J. e., 2017. Performance measurement and theory. Taylor & Francis, Volume 25.

Leyer, M., Heckl, D. & Moormann, J., 2015. Process performance measurement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 227-241.

Lönnqvist, A., 2016. Measurement of intangible success factors: Case studies on the design, implementation and use of measures. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology, 2004. Viidatud Saunila, M. Performance measurement approach for innovation capability in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, p. 165.

Marginson, S., 2014. University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), pp. 45-59.

Matin, R. & Azizi, R., 2015. A unified network-DEA model for performance measurement of production systems. Measurement, Volume 60, pp. 186-193.

Melnyk, S. et al., 2014. Is performance measurement and management fit for the future?. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), pp. 173-186.

Melnyk, S. et al., 2014. Is performance measurement and management fit for the future?. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), pp. 173-86.

Micheli, P. & Mari, L., 2014. The theory and practice of performance measurement. Management accounting research, 25(2), pp. 147-156.

Micheli, P. & Mari, L., 2014. The theory and practice of performance measurement. Management accounting research, 25(2), pp. 147-156.

Morrow Jr, J., Mood, D., Disch, J. & Kang, M., 2015. Measurement and Evaluation in Human Performance, 5E. Human Kinetics.

Morrow Jr, J., Mood, D., Disch, J. & Kang, M., 2015. Measurement and Evaluation in Human Performance, 5E. Human Kinetics.

Nappi, V. & Rozenfeld, H., 2015. The incorporation of sustainability indicators into a performance measurement system. Procedia CIRP, Volume 26, pp. 7-12.

Pádua, S. & Jabbour, C., 2015. Promotion and evolution of sustainability performance measurement systems from a perspective of business process management: From a literature review to a pentagonal proposal. Business Process Management Journal, 21(2), pp. 403-418.

Parida, A., Kumar, U., Galar, D. & Stenström, C., 2015. Performance measurement and management for maintenance: a literature review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 21(1), pp. 2-33.

Parmenter, D., 2015. Key performance indicators: developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. John Wiley & Sons.

Podgórski, D., 2015. Measuring operational performance of OSH management system–A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety science, Volume 73, pp. 146-166.

Powell, A. W. K. et al., 2013. More than a score: a qualitative study of ancillary benefits of performance measurement. BMJ Qual Saf, pp.bmjqs.

Sellitto, M. et al., 2015. A SCOR-based model for supply chain performance measurement: application in the footwear industry. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), pp. 4917-4926.

Shen, Y., Chen, P. & Wang, C., 2016. A study of enterprise resource planning (ERP) system performance measurement using the quantitative balanced scorecard approach. Computers in Industry, Volume 75, pp. 127-139.

Siham, L. et al., 2015. Designing supply chain performance measurement and management systems: A systemic perspective. IEEE, pp. 211-216.

Siham, L. et al., 2015. Designing supply chain performance measurement and management systems: A systemic perspective. IEEE, pp. 211-216.

Speklé, R. & Verbeeten, F., 2014. The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), pp. 131-46.

Speklé, R. & Verbeeten, F., 2014. The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), pp. 131-146.

Star, S., Russ-Eft, D., Braverman, M. & Levine, R., 2016. Performance Measurement and Performance Indicators: A literature review and a proposed model for practical adoption. Human Resource Development Review, 15(2), pp. 151-181.

Tadeu de Oliveira Lacerda, R. et al., 2016. Research opportunities in business process management and performance measurement from a constructivist view. Knowledge and Process Management, 23(1), pp. 18-30.

Taticchi, P. et al., 2014. A review of decision-support tools and performance measurement and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), pp. 6473-6494.

Taticchi, P. et al., 2015. A review of decision-support tools and performance measurement and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), pp. 6473-6494.

Trumpp, C., Endrikat, J., Zopf, C. & Guenther, E., 2015. Definition, conceptualization, and measurement of corporate environmental performance: A critical examination of a multidimensional construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(2), pp. 185-204.

Upadhaya, B., Munir, R. & Blount, Y., 2014. Association between performance measurement systems and organisational effectiveness. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(7), pp. 853-875.

van der Aa, H. et al., 2016. Narrowing the business-IT gap in process performance measurement. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (pp. 543-557). Springer, Cham, pp. 543-557.

Van Dooren, W. & Van de Walle, S. e., 2016. Performance information in the public sector: How it is used. Springer.

Van Horenbeek, A. & Pintelon, L., 2014. Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection. Omega, 42(1), pp. 33-46.

Van Horenbeek, A. & Pintelon, L., 2014. Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection. Omega, 42(1), pp. 33-46.

Yaghoobi, T. & Haddadi, F., 2016. Organizational performance measurement by a framework integrating BSC and AHP. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(7), pp. 959-976.

Yang, K., 2016. Old Pursuit, New Methods: Promising Benefits amid Familiar Challenges. Public Administration Review, 76(4), pp. 547-549.

Abstract

Purpose: The performance measurement includes collecting the information regarding the individual’s performance to analyze for the reporting. . Performance measurement’s main aspect is to identify the exertion are being achieved or not. This is the main purpose of performance measurement in the current study of Pakistani Universities. Moreover, the focus on the performance measurement is still not very strong in Pakistani educational system. Few observations made from the recent studies are that the enrollment in the university has been raised up to a great extent from past few years.

Methodology: This research paper is focus on “The Use of Performance Measurement in Universities of Pakistan” the data were gathered the external sources that is the secondary sources mainly literature review for data collection.

Implications: The performance of Pakistani Universities or higher education institutions providing support ll improve due to performance measurement. Performance measurement in the higher education always calls for higher accountability for its trends to implement. Things that are not good for the performance will be either eliminated or reduced whereas things that are really benefiting the university will be increased and more focus will be placed on them.

Keywords: Performance, performance management, performance measurement, performance measurement in universities and Higher education institutions.