Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Date of this Version

Summer 5-12-2019

Document Type

Article

Citation

  1. Anwar, M. (2018, November 3). Contributions of Pakistani Authors to Library Philosophy and Practice from 2008 to 2017. Retrieved January 8, 2019, from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1763
  2. Bapte, V. (2017). DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology (DJLIT): A Bibliometric Analysis of Cited References. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology , 37 (4), 264-269.
  3. Dixit, S., & Katare, V. V. (2007). A Bibliometric Analysis of the 'Journal of the Indian Society for Cotton Improvement'(1995-2004). Annals of Library and Information Studies , 54 (2), 119-123.
  4. Gupta, S., & Hasan, N. (2018). Scientometric Analysis of Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology , 38 (4), pp. 254-258.
  5. Hussain, A., Fatima, N., & Kumar, D. (2011, June). Bibliometric Analysis of the 'Électronic Library' Journal (2000-2010). Retrieved November 11, 2018, from http://www.webology.org/2011/v8n1/a87.html
  6. Informatics. (n.d.). Retrieved January 1, 2018, from http://www.srels.org/index.php/sj
  7. Informatics. (n.d.). SRELS Journal of Information Management. Retrieved January 1, 2018, from i-scholar: www.isholar.in/index.php/sjin
  8. Khan, I. (2016). A scientomentric analysis of DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology(2010-2014). Retrieved November 2, 2018, from emeraldinsight: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2016-0014
  9. Malathy, S., & Kantha, P. (2015). Journal of Spacecraft Technology: A Bibliometric Study. SRELS Journal of Information Management , 52 (2), 141-151.
  10. Raju, N. G. (2017, April-June). A Scientometric Analysis of International of International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology (IJIDT) During 2011-2015. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology , 7 (2), pp. 146-150.
  11. Rao, R. I. (1985). Quatitative Methods for Library and Information Science. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern Limited.
  12. Savanur, K., & Srikanth. (2010). Modified Collaborative Coefficient: A new measure for qualifying degree of research collaboration. Retrieved January 3, 2017, from DOI-10.1007/s11192-009-0100-4
  13. Subramanyam, K. (1982). Bibliometrics Studies of Research Collaboration: A review. Retrieved May 12, 2016, from http://jis.sagpub.com
  14. Thangamani, T., Palaniappan, P., & Vinoth Kumar, C. (2018, June 6). A Bibliometric Analysis of Contributins in the Journal "NATURE". Retrieved December 28, 2019, from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1852

Abstract

Abstract: The article is based on the bibliometric analysis of 54 issues of SRELS Journal of Information Management published during 2010 to 2018. Each issue published 9.74% research output by and large. Of the total 572 documents, 91.95% were published as the articles. There were 7690 citations were appended to the 526 research papers. Each article quoted more or less 14 sources. The year 2013 contained maximum articles and equally had more (1154) citations. Most of the studies (57) were published as Usage Study followed by Bibliometrics and Scientometrics on which 47 articles were published each. Most of the papers (49.26) % were written by two authors, thus indicating the trend towards multiple authorship. Single authorship (32.69%) was at the second position. The average DC for the authorship pattern was 0.65 while average MCC was observed as 0.3677 for the period considered for the study. With regard to geographical contribution, Karnataka (179), the state of India was observed as highly productive. Average page length of the articles published in the source journal was examined as 9 pages.

Download

Share

COinS