Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Date of this Version

6-26-2013

Citation

References

Agarwal, R and Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a Firm’s Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability. Information Systems Research vol.13: pp. 168-186.

Buschke, L. 1997. The basics of building a great website. Training and Development 51(7) 46-48.

Diaz, K. (1998), “The role of the library website: a step beyond Deli sandwiches”, Reference &

User Services Quarterly, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 41-3.

Geissler, G. Zinkhan G. and Watson, R. (2001).Web Homepage Complexity and Communication

Effectiveness. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. vol. 2: pp. 1-46.

Geissler, G., Zinkhan G., and Watson R. (2006). The Influence of Home Page Complexity on

Consumer Attention, Attitudes, and Purchase Intent. Journal of Advertising. vol. 35: pp.69-80.

Gerjsets, P. Hellenthal, T. (2008). Competent Information Search in The World Wide Web:

Development of a Web Training for Pupils. Science Direct, Computer in Human Behavior

vol.24: pp. 693-715.

Hong, S. and Moriai, M. (1997). Evaluation Criteria for the Design of Commercial Web Sites.

(http://hsb.baylor.edu/ramsower/ais.ac.97/papers/hong.htm).

Hlynka, D. and Welsh, J. (1996). What Makes an Effective Home Page? A Critical Analysis.

(http://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/education/cmns/aect.html).

Hui, K. Teo, H. and Lee, S. (2007). The Value of Privacy Assurance: An Exploratory Field

Experiment. MIS Quarterly Vol. 31: pp.19-33.

Huizingh, E. (2000). The Content and Design of Websites: An Empirical Study. Information and

Management. Vol. 37: pp. 123-34.

Jiang, Z. and Benbassat, I. (2007). The Effects of Presentations Formats and Task Complexity on

Online Consumers’ Product Understanding. MIS Quarterly Vol. 31: pp.475-500.

Machlis, S. (1998). Quick study: Cookies are a marker’s dream, but do they watch too closely?

Computerworld 32(43) 43-44.

McGillis, L., & Toms, E. G. (2001). Usability of the academic library web site: implications for design. College & research libraries, 62(4), 355-367.

McKinney, V. Yoon, K. and Zahedi, F. (2002). The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction:

An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach. Information Systems Research Vol.13: pp.

296-315.

Nadkarni, S. and Gupta, R. (2007). A task Based Model of Perceived Website Complexity. MIS

Quarterly Vol. 31: pp.501-524.

Nielson, J. (1999). User interface Directions for the Web. Communication of the ACM, 42(1),65-72.

Nielsen, J. (January 4, 2008). Is Navigation Useful? Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox.

(http://www.useit.com/alertbox/user-skills.html).

Nielsen, J. and Tahir, M. (2002),Homepage Usability: 50 Web sites Deconstructed, New Riders,

Indianapolis, IN.

Palmer, J. (2002). Website Usability, Design and Performance Criteria, Information Systems

Research Vol.13: pp. 150-167.

Qutab, S.,& Mahmood, K. (2009). Library web sites in Pakistan: An analysis of content. Program: electronic library and information systems, 43(4), 430-445.

Raquel, B. (2001). Using Protocol Analysis to Evaluate the Usability of a Commercial website.

Information and Management. 39, 151-163.

Rasmussen, J. 1996. Design with the user in mind, and you can’t go awry. Comput. Canada Vol.22: pp. 47-48.

Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer

Interaction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

Stevenson, J. S. Bruner, G. C. II. and Kumar A. (2000). Web Page Background and Viewer

Attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research. (40:1&2), : pp. 29-34.

Zhang, P. Dran, V.G. Blake, P. and Pipithsuksunt, V. (2001). Important Design Features in Different

Web Site Domains. E-Service Journal Vol. 1: pp. 77-91.

Zhang, P. and Dran, V.G. (2000). Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers: A Two-Factor Model for Website

Design and Evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(14):

pp. 1253-1268.

Abstract

This study aims to present an improved and better understanding of important website design components, satisfaction of users, and their interaction with academic library website in an online environment.The findings of this study will help to design effective websites and improved usability components. Survey has been used to identify important factors that appear to influence perceptions about websites including web surfing activities, good graphics, number of links, amount of text and use of animations. The results specify that academic library website users tend to prefer interactive websites having the presence of basic elements and free from pop-up advertisements. Overall this paper contributes to good library website designing techniques, use of sophisticated features, standard components and implications for website designers while developing academic library websites.