Natural Resources, School of

 

School of Natural Resources: Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research

Accessibility Remediation

If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.

First Advisor

Cory Forbes

Date of this Version

5-2018

Document Type

Thesis

Citation

Petitt, D. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Role of Values in Reasoning about Socio-hydrological Issues in Undergraduate Students from Developed and Developing Countries. Masters thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.

Comments

A thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science, Major: Natural Resource Sciences, Under the Supervision of Professor Cory Forbes. Lincoln, Nebraska: May 2018

Copyright (c) 2018 Destini N. Petitt

Abstract

In a world that is becoming increasingly connected and exploited, it is essential to understand how students’ values influence socio-scientific reasoning, particularly when dealing with complex, multifaceted, ever-connected water-related issues. This research strives to better understand stakeholder reasoning to provide teachers and decision-makers with ways to implement those stakeholders’ ideals into choices about complex socio-hydrological issues. Moreover, with 96% of research behavioral research being conducted on peoples from developed countries – who only represent 17% of the world’s population – this study strives to understand how peoples from developing countries – who represent 83% of the world’s population – reason. For this study, I asked questions focusing on the values undergraduate students from developed and developing countries identify with, how those values are used in socio-hydrological reasoning, and if the quality of reasoning differs between the two groups. Results show a significant difference between the two groups’ value identification, as well as the use of those values in their socio-hydrological reasoning. Additionally there was a statically significant difference in the overall quality of reasoning between the two groups. This study begins to shed light on how students use their values in reasoning about socio-hydrological issues.

Advisor: Cory Forbes

Share

COinS