Clayton et al. Respond

Authors

C.E. Clayton, University of California, Los Angeles
C. Joshi, University of California, Los Angeles
C. Darrow, University of California, Los Angeles
Donald P. Umstadter, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

Date of this Version

10-7-1985

Comments

Published by American Physical Society. Physical Review Letters 55 1652 (1985). http://prl.aps.org. Copyright © 1985 American Physical Society. Permission to use.

Abstract

Clayton et al. Respond: The authors of the Comment are quite correct when they point out that the ruby-laser scattering system used in our study can only respond to beat-excited density fluctuations with k_y = k₂, where the CO₂ (ruby) beam propagates in the z (y) direction.