Psychology, Department of

 

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

March 2003

Comments

Published in Journal of Family Psychology Vol. 17, No.2 (2003), pp. 220-228. Copyright © 2003 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. http:// www.apa.org/journals/fam/ “This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.” Used by permission.

Abstract

In its efforts to protect the health of unborn children, the government is increasingly attempting to regulate pregnant women’s conduct. As with other policies affecting pregnant women’s autonomy, these policies have constitutional overtones. In Ferguson v. City of Charleston (2001), the Supreme Court struck down a South Carolina hospital’s policy of testing pregnant women for cocaine and turning positive results over to law enforcement for prosecution. This article discusses the basis of the decision and its legal and behavioral implications. Although the decision came down on the side of pregnant women’s rights, it left unresolved the issue of whether a similar policy could be constructed that would pass constitutional muster. The article concludes with a consideration of the likely effects of, and alternatives to, such a policy.

Share

COinS