Date of this Version
Court Review, Volume 50, Issue 2 (2014)
ARTICLES 44 Brain Imaging for Judges: An Introduction to Law and Neuroscience. 52 Evidentiary Incommensurability: A Preliminary Exploration of the Problem of Reasoning from General Scientific Data to Individualized Legal Decision-Making. 62 The Admissibility of Brain Scans in Criminal Trials: The Case of Positron Emission Tomography. 70 Should the Science of Adolescent Brain Development Inform Public Policy?. 78 Pain as Fact and Heuristic: How Pain Neuroimaging Illuminates Moral Dimensions of Law. 94 The Status of NeuroLaw: A Plea for Current Modesty and Future, Cautious Optimism. ESSAY 104 Keeping Up with Neurolaw: What to Know and Where to Look. DEPARTMENTS 42 Editor’s Note. 43 President’s Column. 108 The Resource Page.