Papers in the Biological Sciences
Date of this Version
6-2018
Citation
Published in BioScience 68:6 (June 2018), pp 455–463.
doi:10.1093/biosci/biy037
Abstract
By having students select one answer among several plausible options, multiple–choice (MC) questions capture a student’s preferred answer but provide little information regarding a student’s thinking on the remaining options. We conducted a crossover design experiment in which similar groups of introductory biology students were assigned verbatim questions in the MC format or multiple–true–false (MTF) format, which requires students to separately evaluate each option as either true or false. Our data reveal that nearly half of the students who select the correct MC answer likely hold incorrect understandings of the other options and that the selection rates for individual MC options provide inaccurate estimations of how many students separately endorse each option. These results suggest that MC questions systematically overestimate question mastery and underestimate the prevalence of mixed and partial conceptions, whereas MTF questions enable students and instructors to gain a more nuanced portrait of student thinking with little additional effort.
Included in
Biology Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Higher Education Commons
Comments
Copyright © 2018 Brian A. Couch, Joanna K. Hubbard, and Chad E. Brassil. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences. Used by permission.