Neonicotinoid pesticide and nitrate mixture removal and persistence in floating treatment wetlands

Authors

Julia K. Lindgren, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Tiffany L. Messer, University of Kentucky
Daniel N. Miller, USDA-ARS
Daniel D. Snow, University of Nebraska at LincolnFollow
Thomas G. Franti, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

Date of this Version

8-30-2022

Citation

Lindgren, J. K., Messer, T. L., Miller, D. N., Snow, D. D., & Franti, T. G. (2022). Neonicotinoid pesticide and nitrate mixture removal and persistence in floating treatment wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20411

Comments

U.S. government works are not subject to copyright.

Abstract

Mesocosm and microcosm experiments were conducted to explore the applicability of floating treatment wetlands (FTWs), an ecologically based management technology, to remove neonicotinoid insecticides and nitrate from surface water. The mesocosm experiment evaluated three treatments in triplicate over a 21-d period. Floating treatment wetland mesocosms completely removed nitrate-N over the course of the experiment even when neonicotinoid insecticides were present. At the completion of the experiment, 79.6% of imidacloprid and degradation byproducts and 68.3% of thiamethoxam and degradation byproducts were accounted for in the water column. Approximately 3% of imidacloprid and degradation byproducts and 5.0% of thiamethoxam and degradation byproducts were observed in above-surface biomass, while ∼24% of imidacloprid and degradation byproducts, particularly desnitro imidacloprid, and <0.1% of thiamethoxam and degradation byproducts were found in the below surface biomass. Further, 1 yr after the experiments, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and degradation byproducts persisted in biomass but at lower concentrations in both the above- and below-surface biomass. Comparing the microbial communities of mature FTWs grown in the presence and absence of neonicotinoids, water column samples had similar low abundances of nitrifying Archaeal and bacterial amoA genes (below detection to 10⁴ ml⁻¹) and denitrifying bacterial nirK, nirS, and nosZ genes (below detection to 10⁵ ml⁻¹). Follow-up laboratory incubations found the highest denitrification potential activities in FTW plant roots compared with water column samples, and there was no effect of neonicotinoid addition (100 ng L⁻¹) on potential denitrification activity. Based on these findings, (a) FTWs remove neonicotinoids from surface water through biomass incorporation, (b) neonicotinoids persist in biomass long-term (>1 yr after exposure), and (c) neonicotinoids do not adversely affect nitrate-N removal via microbial denitrification.