Date of this Version
Alwi, N. H., Mahirb, N. A., & Ismail, S. (2014). Infusing Social Media in Teaching and Learning (TnL) at Tertiary Institutions: A Case of Effective Communication in Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 265-270.
Angelino, L., Williams, F., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1–14.
Au, N., Ngai, E. W., & Cheng, T. C. (2008). Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation: An equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 43-66.
Bagozzi, R., Davis, F., & Warshaw, P. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 660-686.
Beames, S., Mitchell, G., & Marshall, S. (2009). Using the e-Learning Maturity Model to Benchmark Institutional Learning and Teaching Plans and Capabilities. Educause in Australasia Conference. Perth, Australia.
Betts, K. (2008). Online human touch (OHT) instruction and programming: A conceptual framework to increase student engagement and retention in online education, part 1. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 399–418.
Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, G., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical Success Factors for E-learning in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis Between ICT Experts and Faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855.
Chong, M. C., Francis, K., Cooper, S., Abdullah, K. L., Hmwe, N. T., & Sohoda, S. (2016). Access to, interest in and attitude toward e-learning for continuous education among Malaysian nurses. Nurse Education Today, 370-374.
Clarke, J., Stoodley, I., & Nelson, K. (2013). Using a maturity model to move student engagement practices beyond the generational approach. 16th International First Year in Higher Education Conference,. Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington.
Delone, W., & Mclean, E. (2003). The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: A ten year update. Journal of Management information Systems, 19(4), 238.
DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
Duan, Y., He, Q., Feng, W., Li, D., & Fu, Z. (2010). A study on e-learning take-up intention from an innovation adoption perspective: A case in China. Computers & Education, 3, 1-10.
Endut, A., Isa, P. M., Aziz, S. R., Hajar, M. N., Jono, H., & Aziz, A. A. (2012). e-Learning for Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia (UiTM): Campus Wide Implementation and Accomplishments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 26 – 35.
Firat, M. (2016). Measuring e-Learning Autonomy of Distance Education Students. Open Praxis, 191-201.
Freeze , R., Alshare , K., Lane, P., & Wen, H. (2010). IS Success Model in E-Learning Context Based on Students' Perceptions. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 173-184.
Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012). A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10959–10966.
Hew, T.-S., & Kadir, S. L. (2016). Predicting the acceptance of cloud-based virtual learning environment: The roles of Self Determination and Channel Expansion Theory. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 990-1013.
Holsapple, C., & Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining Assessing and Promoting E-Learning Success : An Information Systems Perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67-85.
Jia, H., Wang, M., Ran, W., Yang, S. J., Liao, J., & Chiu, D. K. (2011). A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 3372–3382.
Juhary, J. (2012). Making Sense of e-Learning and Simulations: The Misunderstood Perceptions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 229-237.
Kohlegger, M., Maier, R., & Thalmann, S. (2009). Understanding Maturity Models Results of a Structured Content Analysis. Proceedings of I-KNOW ’09 and I- SEMANTICS ’09. Graz, Austria.
Lee, J., Hong, N. L., & Ling, N. L. (2002). An analysis of students’ preparation for the virtual learning environment. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 231-242.
Mahat, J., Ayuba, A. F., & Su Luan, W. (2012). An Assessment of Students’ Mobile Self-Efficacy, Readiness and Personal Innovativeness towards Mobile Learning in Higher Education in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 284-290.
Marshal, S. (2014). e-Learningmaturity model. Retrieved September 28, 2016, from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/
Marshall, S. (2013). Using the e-learning Maturity Model to Identify Good Practice in E-Learning. 30th ascilite Conference 2013 Proceedings, (pp. 546-556). Sydney.
Marshall, S., & Mitchell, G. (2002). An eLearning Maturity Model. 19th ASCILITE conference. Auckland: Unitec.
Marshall, S., & Mitchell, G. (2003). Potential Indicators of E–learning Process Capability. Proceedings of EDUCAUSE in Australasia 2003. Adelaide: EDUCAUSE.
McGill, T., Klobas, J., & Renzi, S. (2014). Critical success factors for the continuing of elearning initiatives. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 24-36.
Menchaca, M., & Bekele, T. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231–252.
Mettler, T., Rohner, P., & Winter, R. (2010). Towards a Classification of Maturity Models in Information Systems. In A. D’Atri et al. (Ed.), Management of the Interconnected World. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag .
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Factors affecting the e-learning outcomes: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 701-719.
Motaghian, H., Hassanzadeh, A., & Moghadam, D. K. (2013). Factors affecting university instructors' adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran. Computers & Education.
Mukendwa, A. (2015). The eLearning Maturity Model (eMM): A framework to enhance the systematic implementation of eLearning policies. 10th Annual eLearning Africa Conference, (pp. 1-19). Ethiopia.
Neuhauser, C. (2004). A maturity model: Does it provide a path for online course design? The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(1).
Nor, A. S., & Kasim, N. A. (2015). Blended Learning Web Tool Usage among Accounting Students: A Malaysian Perspective. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 170-185.
Nordin, N., Embi, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2010). Mobile Learning Framework for Lifelong Learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 130-138.
Nursyahidah Alias, Zazaleena Zakariah, Nor Zalina Ismail, & Mohd Norafizal Abd Aziz. (2012). E-Learning Successful Elements for Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 484-489.
Omar, N. D., Hassan, H., & Atan, H. (2012). Student Engagement in Online Learning: Learners Attitude Toward E-Mentoring. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 464-475.
Othman, M. S., Mohamad, N., Yusuf, L. M., Yusof, N., & Suhaimi, S. M. (2012). An Analysis of e-Learning System Features in Supporting the True e-Learning 2.0. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 56, 454 – 460.
Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53, 1285–1296.
Oztekin, A., Kong, Z. J., & Uysal, O. (2010). UseLearn: A novel checklist and usability evaluation method for eLearning systems by criticality metric analysis. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 455–469.
Petch, J., Calverley, G., Dexter, H., & Campelli, T. (2007). Piloting a Process Maturity Model as an e-Learning Benchmarking Method. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 5(1), 49 - 58.
Russo-Gleicher, R. J. (2015). Improving student retention in online college classes: Qualitative insights from faculty. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 16(2), 239–260.
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 1183-1202.
Turban, E. (1993). Decision support and expert systems: Management support systems. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Van Raaij, E., & Schepers, J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Comput. Educ., 50(3), 838–852.
Van Rooij, S. W., & Zirkle, K. (2016). Balancing pedagogy, student readiness and accessibility: A case study in collaborative online course development. The Internet and Higher Education, 1-7.
Wang, Y. S., Wang, H. Y., & Shee, D. Y. (2007). Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 1792–1808.
Waugh, M., & Su-Searle, J. (2014). Student persistence and attrition in an online M.S. program: Implications for program design. International Journal on e-Learning, 13(1), 101–121.
Yacob, A., Kadir, A. Z., Zainudin, O., & Zurairah, A. (2012). Student Awareness Towards E-Learning In Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 93-101.
Zainuddin, A., Kamaluddin, N., & Hassan, Z. (2012). Exploring Malay Student’s Commitment in Online Learning - A Case of Business Management Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 81-92.
Zakariah, Z., Alias, N., Aziz, M. N., & Ismail, N. Z. (2012). E-Learning Awareness in a Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 621-625.
Public Universities in Malaysia are having many programs offered to their students and using e-learning or VLE as their platform, which mostly enrolled by distant learning students. However, no research report found on the current state of VLE practices whether they should be maintained or improvised. Assessment on process capability should be done to ensure quality operation of VLE. This study aims to assess the process being carried by the higher education provider to identify which process of VLE practice require critical improvement. Using e-Learning Maturity Model (eMM), a group of active lecturer/instructor in e-learning was selected to assess current practices of VLE. The study identifies major processes which require critical improvement based on specific dimensions to enhance VLE operations in higher education institutions. Majority of VLE processes were found to be inadequately practiced. Infrastructure of the VLE platform require serious makeover while teaching and learning support towards students and teacher demands attention. Continuous improvement effort is neglected. Involvement of administrators, librarians, and students as the assessor of the VLE practice to accommodate more specific results are recommended for future study.