Date of this Version
Aina, L. O. (2004). Library and Information Science text for Africa. Ibadan: Third World Information Services Ltd.
Bavakenthy, M.,Veeran, M.C.K.& Salih, T.K.M. (2003). Information access management and exchange in the technological age. New Delhi: Ess Publication.
Bothmann, R.L. & Holmberg, M. (2008). Strategic planning for electronic resources management. In Electronic Resource Management in Libraries: Research and practice by Yu, H and Breivold. NewYork: Information Science Reference.
Cabonero, D.A. & Mayrena, L.B. (2012). The development of a collection development policy,
Library Philosophy and Practice(e-journal). Paper 804.http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/804.
Chaudhuri, S.K. (2012). Fair use vs copyright Non-compliance among the academic community
in universities of developing nations. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 2(1),135-147. Retrieved from. http://wwwijodls.in/ uploads /3/6/0/3 /3603729 /vol 2
Chimah & Nwokaocha. (2015). Categories, availability and awareness of electronic information
resources by postgraduate library users in South East Nigerian Federal Universities. International Journal of Library Science 4(1): 7-12.Accessed 11/11/2015 from http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.library.20150401.02.html
Davis, T.L. (1997). The evolution of selection activities for electronic resources. Library Trends, 45(3), 391-403.
Edgar, W.B. (2003). Towards a theory of collection development: An activities and attributes approach. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 27(4), 393-423.
IFLA. (2012). Key issues for e-resources collection development: A guide for libraries. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/acquisiton-collectiondevelopment /publications/key%20Issues%20for%
Kennedy, J. (2006). Collection management: A concise introduction: Wagga, Wagga Centre for
Information Studies, pp.34-5.
Mansur, S (2012). E-resources collection development in engineering college libraries: a challenge for knowledge center managers. International Journal of Digital LibraryServices, 2(1), 166-177 Retrieved from. http://www.academiaa.ed/11968640/_E resources_Management_at_the Engineering _college_library
Nwosu, C.C & Udo-Anyanwu, A.J. (2015). Collection development in academic libraries in Imo State Nigeria: Status analysis and way forward. International Journal of Advanced
Library and Information Science. 3(1), 126-135. Retrieved from http://scientific.cloud journals. com/index. php/IJALIS/ article/view/Sci 301
Nworgu, B.G (2006). Introduction to educational research. Ibadan: Longman Nigeria Publishers.
Olanlokun, S. O. & Salisu, T. M. (1993). Understanding the library: A handbook on library use. Lagos: University of Lagos Press.
Reitz, J. M. (2004). Dictionary for library and information science. London: Libraries Unlimited.
Sadeh, T. & Ellingsen, M. (2005). Electronic resource management systems: The need and the realization. New Library World, 106 (1212/1213), 208-218
Tsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2006). Analyzing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic services, Journal of Information Service, 32 (5), 400-419. Retrieved from http://www. jis.sagepub. com/content/32/ ... /400. Abstract&sa=
Welch, T.M. (2002). Hey! What about us?! Changing roles of subject specialists and reference librarians in the age of electronic resources. Serials Review, 28(4), 283-286.
Yu, H & Breivold, S. (2008). Electronic resource management in libraries: Research and practice. New York: Information Science Reference
This paper examined the selection practices of electronic resources in federal university libraries in South East Nigeria. The objectives of the study include to find out; who is responsible for selecting electronic resources in the libraries under study; the tools that guide the librarians in selecting electronic resources; the criteria considered by the libraries in evaluating electronic resources for acquisition. The research adopted a descriptive survey design. The survey used questionnaire and interview as instruments of data collection. The population of the study consists of all the 53 Librarians in the three departments; E-library, Serials, and Collection development departments of the libraries under study. Data collected were tabulated and analyzed using simple statistics (mean). The findings revealed the tools used by the libraries to make sound e-resources selection which include the use of trial offer by mounting a link to their resources and the use of reviews provided through electronic resources with a grand mean of 2.75 to 3.20, which are all above the cut-off point of 2.50 on a 4 point rating scale; the librarians in e-library, serials, and collection development recommend electronic resources but the final decision on selection of electronic resources for acquisition rest with the university librarian; that the libraries under study had no selection team/committee and the criteria considered by the libraries in selecting electronic resources for their library were revealed. The study recommended that the libraries should adopt an extensive inclusion of all the stakeholders of the library in selecting electronic resources. Also, the libraries should set up a selection team/committee responsible for e-resources selection.