Open Access Repositories in India: growth, overview of system and policy implementation
Bacchaw, N. (2012). Open Access Initiatives in India: An Overview. In Ancy Jose, Prtibha Gokhale and Santosh Hulagabali (Eds.), Open Access Movement in the Age of Innovation and ICT: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 35-48). Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House.
Bailey, C. W. (2005). The role of reference librarians in institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 259-267.
Barton, M. R., & Waters, M. M. (2004-2005). Creating an institutional repository: LEADIRS workbook SHAPE . Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Berlin Declaration. (2003). Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Retrieved June 11, 2017, from http://www.zim.mfg.de/openaccessberlin/berlin_declaration.html
Bethseda Statement. (2003). Bethseda Statement on open access publication. Retrieved February 11, 2017, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
BOAI [Budapest Open Access Initiative]. (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. Budapest, Hungery: Open Society Institute, Soros Foundation. Retrieved July 11, 2017, from http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml.
Crow, R. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. Washington, D. C: The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition. Retrieved April, 2018 from http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html.
DINI. (2003). DINI-Certificate for Document and Publication Services. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-10075687
Gibbons, S. (2004). Establishing an Institutional Repository. Library Technology Reports, 40(4), 1-68.
Gibson, I. (2005). Overview of the House of Commons science and technology select committee inquiry into scientific publications. Serials, 18(1), 10-12.
Graaf, M. V., & Eijndhoven, K. V. (2008). The European Repository Landscape. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Green, A., Macdonald, S., & Rice, R. (2009). Policy making for research data in repositories: a guide. Retrieved February 5, 2016, from http://www.disc-uk.org/docs/guide.pdf
Jones, R., Andrew, T., & MacColl, J. (2006). The Institutional Repository. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Mark Ware Consulting Ltd. (2004). Publisher and Library/Learning Solutions (PALS): Pathfinder Research on Web-Based Repositories: Final Report. Retrieved May 11, 2017, from http://www.ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/indest-ncsi-ir/resources/PALS_report_IR.pdf
Millington, P. (2006). Moving forward with the OpenDOAR directory. In 8th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, Bergen. Retrieved March 17, 2018, from http://www.opendoar.org/documents/BergenPresentation20060512Handouts.ppt
OpenDOAR. (2018). The Directory of Open Access Repositories. Retrieved July 12, 2018, from http://www.opendoar.org/
Pinfield, S. (2004). Self-archiving publications. In G. E. Gorman & F. Rowland (Eds.), International yearbook of Library and Information Management 2004-2005: Scholarly publishing in an electronic era (pp. 118-145). London: Facet.
Pinfield, S. (2005). A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories. Serials, 18(1), 30-34.
Probets, S., & Jenkins, C. (2006). Documentation for Institutional Repositories. Learned Publishing, 19(1), 57–71.
ROARMAP. (2018). Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies. Retrieved July 12, 2018, from http://roarmap.eprints.org/
Roy, B. K. (2014). Designing Institutional Digital Repository for the University of Burdwan: A FLOSS Based Prototype. A PhD Thesis, Library and Information Science Department, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan.
Roy, B. K. (2015). Institutional Digital Repository: From Policy to Practice. Germany: LAP.
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2017). BURA: An Open Access Multilingual Information Retrieval and Representation System for Indian Higher Education and Research Institutions. Library Philosophy and Practice. Paper 1541. pp.1-15. Retrieved June 21, 2017, fromhttp://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1541
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2016). The COAPI cats: the current state of open access repository movement and policy documentations. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 6(1), 69-84.
Rieh, S. Y., et al. (2008). Perceptions and experiences of staff in the planning and implementation of institutional repositories. Library trends, 57(2), 168-190.
Sale, A. (2004). Comparison of content policies for institutional repositories in Australia. First Monday, 9(5). Retrieved April, 2016, from http://www.firstmonday.org./search.html
Sale, A. (2006a). Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. First Monday, 11(4). Retrieved April, 2016, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_4/sale/
Sale, A. (2006c). The impact of mandatory policies on ETD acquisition. D–Lib Magazine, 12(4). Retrieved May 23, 2016, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april06/sale/04sale.html
Shearer, K. (2005). Institutional repositories: The evolution of scholarly communication. Retrieved May 7, 2018, from http://www.carl-abrc.ca/projects/institutional_repositories/ppt/CACUL2-Apr05.ppt.
Swan,A. (2012). Policy Guidelines for the development and promotion of open access. France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved March 22, 2016, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002158/215863e.pdf
Swan, A., et al. (2015). PASTEUR4OA Project. open access policy: numbers, analysis, effectiveness. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/375854/1/PASTEUR4OA3.pdf
Ware, M. (2004). Publisher and Library/Learning Solutions (PALS): Pathfinder Research on Web-Based Repositories: Final Report. Bristol: Mark Ware Consulting Ltd. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.palsgroup.org.uk
The paper provides an overview of open access repository (OAR) movement as a Green path to open access (OA) throughout the World with reference to India. The main objective of the paper is to give a broad look at the current state of deployment of OARs in India and to discuss problems and prospects of Indian OARs in respect of their policy documents. Recommendations and best practice guidelines at national and international level have been consulted in order to select the criteria for evaluation of repositories. Finally, key findings along with suggestions have been proposed for the development of Indian OARs in global context.