Date of this Version
Aksnes,D.W.,K,Rorstad,F,F.Piro & G.Sivertsen.( 2011). Are Female Researchers Less Cited? A Large-Scale Study of Norwegian Scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(4):628-36.doi: 10.1002/asi.21486
Astin,H. & A.E.Bayer. (1979). Pervasive Sex Differences in the Academic Reward System: Scholarship, Marriage and What Else? In Academic Rewards in Higher Education. D.R.Lewis and W.E.Becker (eds.). Cambridge,Mass:Ballinger Publishing Company.211-29.
Bhattacharyya,N. & Shapiro,N.L.(2000). Increased Female Authorship in Otolaryngology over the past three decades. The Laryngoscope, 111:358-361.doi: 10.1097/00005537-200003000-00005
Brisset, Marilyn M. (2015). Aspects of Authorship,Co-authorship and Productivity in School Library Research 1998-2012. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML) Special Issue Bibliometrics and Scientometrics. 5-16.
Cole,J.R. & S.Cole.(1973). Social Strafication in Science .Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
Cole, J.R. & H.Zukerman.( 1984.) The Productivity Puzzle:Persistence and change in pattern of publication of Men and Women Scientists. In Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Edited by P.Maehr and M.W.SteinKamp (eds.). , 217-58,Greenwich,CT.:JAI Press
Cole, S. ( 1979). Age and Scientific Performance. American Journal of Sociology, 84:958-77.
Evans,H.K. & Moulder,A. (2011). Reflecting o n a Decade of Women’s Publications in Four Top Political Science Journals, Political Science and Politics. 44(4):793-798.doi: 10.1177/1369148116658850
Ferber,M.A(.1988). Citations and Networking. Gender and Society. 2(1):82-89.doi: 10.1177/089124388002001006
Jean-Pierre V M Herubel.(1992). Authorship, Gender and Institutional Affiliation in Library History. Behavioural and Social Sciences Librarian. 11(1):49-54.doi: 10.1300/J103v11n01 04.
Lockheed,M.E. & Stein,S.L. (1980). The Status of Women’s Research in Educational Publications. Educational Researcher. 9(2):11-15.
Long,J. & F.Fox. (1995). Scientific Careers:Universalism and Particularism. Annual Review of Sociology. 21: 45-71.doi:10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.000401
McElhinny, B.M.Hole, R.Holtzkerner,S.Unger & C.Hicks. (2003). Gender Publication and Citation in Sociolinguistics and Linguistic Anthropology. Language in Society. 32(3):299-328.
Mitchell,S., Mclaugin,S.Lange & H,Brus.(2013). Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals. International Studies Perspectives. 14(4):485-92. doi:10.111/insp.12026.
Projesky,Heidi.(2008).A Career-history analysis of Gender Differences in Publication Productivity among South African Academics. Science Studies. 21(2):47-67.doi:10.1080/21528586.2006.10419149
Rigg,L.S.,McCarragher,S. & Krmenec,A. (2012). Authorship, Collaboration and Gender:Fifteen Years of Publications Productivity in Selected Geography Journals. The Professional Geographer. 64(4):491-502.doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.611434
The SRELS Journal of Information Management has been playing vital role in the library and information science field since last fifty years. This paper presents the results of a bibliometric study of articles with a gender viewpoint from 2007-2017. The aim of the study is to examine the journal during the period 2007-2017 using bibliometric indicators with a gender perspective. The pattern of research output in 606 publications is analyzed in which 435(71.78%) articles are contributed by male authors and 171(28.21%) by female authors. The degree of collaboration in the publications of the journal is 0.66. Most of the articles i.e. (52.31%) are two authored articles. The male and female distribution by professional category indicates large number of contributing authors belonged to non-teaching category i.e. 389 out of which 292 (67.12%) are male authors and 97 (56.72%) female authors. Maximum number i.e. 222 (36.6%) contributions are under male-male authorship pattern followed by 153(25.2%) male solo papers. Citation study showed that 120 cited articles received 215 citations. Male authors contributed maximum number of articles in the subject category “bibliometrics analysis” whereas females authored large number of articles on the topic “use studies”. Overall research productivity of male LIS professionals is higher than female authors.