Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Date of this Version


Document Type



  1. Sengupta IN. Bibliometrics: A bird's eye view. IASLIC Bulletin. 1985;30(4):167-74.
  2. Gauthier É. Bibliometric analysis of scientific and technological research: a user's guide to the methodology. Canada: Science and Technology Redesign Project, Statistics Canada; 1998 Sep.
  3. Broadus R. Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics. 1987;12(5-6):373-9.
  4. Garfield E. From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. Journal of Informetrics. 2009;3(3):173-9.
  5. Swain DK. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2004-2009: a scientometric appraisal.
  6. Thanuskodi S. Journal of Social Sciences: A Bibliometric Study. Journal of Social Sciences. 2010;24(2):77-80.
  7. Narang A, Kumar A. A bibliometric study of Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. SRELS Journal of Information Management. 2010;47(1):31-9.
  8. Abubakar AB, Harande YI. A snapshot of information-seeking behavior literature in health sciences: a bibliometric approach.
  9. Ullah M, Butt IF, Haroon M. The Journal of Ayub Medical College: a 10 year bibliometric study. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2008 Jun 1;25(2):116-24.
  10. Jena KL. A bibliometric analysis of the journal ‘Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research, 1996-2004’.
  11. Bojo CC, Carabantes AD, Veiga DC, Martínez HD. Bibliometric analysis of the Spanish Journal of Chemotherapy (1996-2000). Revistaespanola de quimioterapia: publicacionoficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia. 2004 Jun;17(2):161-8.
  12. Shokeen A, Kaushik SK. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology: a citation analysis.
  13. Ibrahim M, Jan SU. Bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Pakistan Medical Association form 2009 to 2013. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Sep 1;65(9):978-83.
  14. Kalyane VL, Sen BK. A bibliometric study of the Journal of Oilseeds Research. Annals of Library Science and Documentation. 1995;42(4):121-41.
  15. Xia X, Li M, Xiao CF. Author analysis of papers published in" Space Medicine & Medical Engineering" from 1988 to 1998. Hang tian yi xue yu yi xue gong cheng= Space medicine & medical engineering. 1999 Dec;12(6):431-5.
  16. Ullah S, Jan SU, Jan T, Ahmad HN, Jan MY, Rauf MA. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan: Five Years Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2016;26(11):920-3.
  17. Ullah, S., Ahmad, H. N., Jan, S. U., Jan, T., Shah, S., Butt, N. I., & Jan, M. Y. (2017). A statistical analysis of Pakistan Journal of Surgery: A bibliometric lens from 2007-2016. Pak J Surg, 33(2), 123-127.
  18. Swain DK, Jena KL, Mahapatra RK. Interlending and Document Supply: a bibliometric study from 2001 to 2010. Webology. 2012; 9 (2). Available from
  19. 19. Swain C, Swain DK, Rautaray B. Bibliometric analysis of Library Review from 2007 to 201. Lib Rev. 2013; 62 (8/9): 602-618. doi:


Objective:This paper aims to describe bibliometric study of scholarly literature published in Pakistan Heart Journalcoveringperiod from 2005 to 2015 and to explore publication trends.

Methodology:This quantitative study applied required bibliometric methods to analyze Originalarticles, authorship pattern, citations, contributions from different regions and other relevant parameters of Pakistan Heart Journal covering period from January 2005 to June 2015. The data is collected from Postgraduate Medical Institute (PGMI) Library.

Results:The study reveals that number of articles published in each issue of the journal ranges from 09 to 44. In regard to productivity, male authors hadhighest contribution (90.84%) and majority of authors belonged to Khyber Pukhtunkhwareion(41.69%). The finding shows that Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar had the highest research productivity in the region. Cardiologyis main subject area covered in the articles with Ischemic heart disease as leading topic (23%) followed by Preventive cardiology (19.47%). Articles with three authors were more in numbers (24.03%). Journal (95.36%) proved to be the more cited source of information.Variation was found in the number of references cited in each article, 38.67% (87) articles have 11-20 references. Article’s length was also analyzed and it was revealed thatmajority (30.22%) of articles were comprised of threepages.

Conclusion: The Study investigated that the frequency of Pakistan Heart Journal found irregular with gradual increase in number of articles. Significantincrease in number of articles had been seen in the last five years.Being a special journal about heart diseases, largernumber of articles was on Ischemic heart disease followed by Preventivecardiology.