Date of this Version
Aalaa, M, Peimani ,etal(2014). A Review Of Web-Assisted Inter Ventions For The Management Of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Iranian journal of Diabetes and Metabolism,13(3),211-22. (Persian)
Ansari, M.( 2016). Evidence-based medicine. evidence-based librarianship.Iranian Librarian &Librarian2.0 ,Magazine, 2(2).(Persian)
Azadeh, F,.etal(2015). Evaluation of the Compliance of Evidence Based Medicine Resources Based on Ovid Criteria. Health Inf Manage, 12(1),87. (Persian)
.Azadeh Tafaroshi F,etal(2012). The role of librarians Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in Evidence-Based Practice. Journal of Knowledge,3(11),33-45. (Persian)
Bahmaee,E,Farhadpour ,M(2017). Evaluation of the performance of web search engines in retrieving the information in the field of information and knowledge based on seven indicators. Library and Information Science Studies,(DOI): 10.22055/slis.2017.23534.1392. (Persian)
.Beydokhti, H, Haji Zeinolabedini ,M(2011). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Medical Information Resources Based on the Rate of answers provided for Clinical Questions. Journal of Health Administration, 14 (44). (Persian)
Cambpell ,R, Ash ,j(2006). An evaluation of five bedside information products using a user-centered.task-oriented approach.J Med Libr Assoc, 94(4),435-7.
Crosson ,JC, et al(2010). Physicians’ Perceptions of Barriers to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Control among Patients with Diabetes: Results from the Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Study.J Am Board Fam Med,23(2),171–8.
Davidoff, F, etal(1995). Evidence based medicine. BMJ, 310,1085-6.
Farrell, A(2008). An Evaluation of the Five Most Used Evidence Based Bedside Information Tools in Canadian Health Libraries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 3(2),3-17.
Fenton, SH, Badgett, RG. A comparison of primary care information content in UpToDate and the National Guideline Clearinghouse, J Med Libr Assoc,2007, 95(3),255-59.
Golozar, A , et al(2011). Diabetes Mellitus and Its Correlates in an Iranian Adult Population. PLoS One, 6(10),1-9. (Persian)
Hedari, GH(.2006). Evaluation criteria electronic information resources with emphasis on Web sites. Information Science,20(3-4),17-32. (Persian)
. Kumar,B T,Prakash, J N(2009). Precision and Relative Recall of Search Engines: A Comparative Study of Google and Yahoo. Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management,38,124-138.
Larijan, B, Zahedi, F(2001). Epidemiology of diabetes in Iran.Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Lipid Disorders.,1(1),1-8. (Persian)
Malkizadeh,F,etal(2016) The Study of Thematic Structure of Documents related to the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 in PubMed from 2005-2014. Journal of Health Administration, 19(64). (Persian)
Mirhosseni ,Z,BabaeE,.A(2013). Comparative study of recall and precision specialized medical search engines in retrieving data and gynecology systems and information services quarterly,1(2),45-57. (Persian)
Mohamad esmael ,S, Naragian, N(2017). Comparison of search engines and search engines to retrieve dental informationJournal of Research in Dentistry,52(2),118-127. (Persian)
Mohammadesmaeil Lafzighazi, S, E,Gilvari, A(2008). Comparing Search Engines and Meta-search Enginesin Pharmaceutics Information Retrieval. Health Information Management, 5(2),129. (Persian)
Mojiri, Shetal(2011). Search Online Databases of the Features Available on the Website of the Central Library of the University Based on International Standards. Health Inf Manage,9(2),1-8. (Persian)
Rahmani ,M, Haji Zeinolabedini, M(2015). Compare integrity and performance of databases Science Direct and Springer. Journal of Systems and Information Services, 4(1,2),63-74. (Persian)
Rakhshande ro, S, Hedarnea, A, Rajab, A(. 2006). The effect of health education on the quality of life of diabetic patients. Journal of Shahed University,13(63),15-20. (Persian)
Rathbone, J.A(2016) comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.Biomedcentral.,5:27.
.Rosenberg WC, etal(1995). Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. Br Med J,310,1122-6.
Sackett DL,etal(1996). Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't?. BMJ, 312, 71-2.
Sadegi, H, Akhvati ,M(2014). Precision and recall databases SID, MagIran, IranMedex Retrieving information in the field of pharmaceutical. Health Information Management,11(4),435-442. (Persian)
Shabbidar, S, Fathi, B(.2007). Effects of nutrition education on knowledge and attitudes of type 2 diabetic patients. J Birjand Univ Med Sci,14(1),31-7.
Schacher LF(2001). Clinical librarianship: its value in medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134(8),717.
Yarahmadi, A ,et al (2015). Effects of non-attendance information therapy on the control of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) in type 2 diabetic patients in Isfahan. Modern Care, Scientific Quarterly of Birjand Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, 11 (4), 268-274. (Persian)
Zare V(2006).Evidence-based medicine approach among clinical faculty members. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci Health Service;28(1),61-6. (Persian)
Among the large volume of information existed in the more important fields such as diabetes, the evidence-based resources offer timely the information to the physicians who do not have enough time to study.While the selection of validated sources face challenges in the field of diabetes, this study compare the sources recovered from the evidence-based databases.The design of this research is cross-sectional, survey, descriptive and is an applied type. Preparing a list on clinical questions here was done as referring to the Diabetes Center in Semirom for 5 months. The following keywords were searched on databases: Up To Date, Clinical Key, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid, and PubMed Tool. The data were analyzed using the descriptive and inferential statistics in terms of tables, diagrams, chi-square test. The findings showed that both Ovid and Clinical Key databases recovered more relevant documents in contrast to other databases. According to the most relevant documents. According to the relevant and relatively relevant documents, Clinical Key, Embase, Ovid and Up To Date databases had the highest recall in contrast to the PubMed and Cochrane databases which possessed the lowest recall. According to the most relevant documents, the Ovid Database has the highest precision while the PubMed Database had the lowest precision. Among the databases, up to date had retrieved the relevant documents.Ovid possesses more recall and precision among the databases analyzed, But evidence-based resources are generally well-suited to clinical questions in the field of diabetes