Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A., & Kiran, K. (2010). Global visibility of Asian universities’
Open Access institutional repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information
Science, 15(3), 53-73. Retrieved on January 07, 2019 from http://ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/article/957.pdf .
Allen, J. (2005). Interdisciplinary differences in attitudes towards deposit in institutional repositories: Master interdisciplinary differences in attitudes towards deposit in institutional repositories. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University.
Clifford, L. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infra structure for scholarship
in digital age. ARL bimonthly report, 226, l-7.
Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., and White, S. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16 (S1), 145-161.
Fayaz, A.L. (2014). Open Access Digital Repositories in Asia: Current Status and Future Prospects. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 12(2), 35- 45
Kim, J. (2007). Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories. Journal of Digital Information 8 (2). Retrieved December 21, 2018, from http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/viewArticle/193/177
Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Watkinson, A., Brown, D., and Jamali, H. R. (2013).
Have digital repositories come of age? The views of library directors Webology, 10 (2), 195-206.
Pinfield, S. (2005). A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories. Serials, 18(1). Retrieved in December 22, 2018 from http://uksg.metapress.com/media/d86tgdpafp4yvl806ywv/contributions/y/b/j/r/ybjrxg wpp57hvllf.pdf.
Roy, B.K., Biswas, S.C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2012). Open access repositories in Asia:
From SAARC to Asian Tigers. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2012. Retrieved 2019 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1998&context=libphilprac
UNESCO (2015) Education 2030 Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all Retrieved January 05, 2019, from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/ED_new/pdf/FFA- ENG-27Oct15.pdf
Xia, J. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 647-654.
This study examines the contributions of African countries to open digital repositories in the world information space. Two online directories of open digital repositories were used as data sources. The OpenDOAR is an authoritative directory of academic open access repositories listing 3,670 repositories as at 6th January, 2019. The Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR) is a directory of 4,580 institutional repositories and their contents as at 7th January, 2019. Extracted data were analysed using quantitative techniques and presented in tabular and pictorial formats to reveal findings in accordance with desired objectives. The results revealed that Dspace is the most preferred open digital repositories software across the world. The results showed that the contributions of African countries (3.78%) to open digital repositories in the world are low. The results also showed that only 22 African countries contribute to global open digital repositories and that the rate of contribution increased rapidly in the last few years. The study concludes that for Africa to overcome the challenges associated with open digital repositories there is need for more African countries to be involved in the African Open Access Initiative and the need to tap into the experiences of various professionals on the African continent