Date of this Version
Aytac, S. (2010). Scientific International Collaboration of Turkey, Greece, Poland, and Portugal: a Bibliometric analysis. ASIST, 22-27.
Beaudry, C., & Schiffauerova, A. (2011). Is Canadian intellectual property leaving Canada? A study of nanotechnology patenting. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9211-1.
Garg,K.C & Padhi,P. Scientometrics of Laser Research Literature as viewed through the Journal of CurrentLaserAbstracts.Scientometrics,1999, 45(2),251 – 268.
Garousi, V & Varma, T. (2012). A Bibliometrics Analysis of Canadian Electrical and Computer Engineering Institutions (1996-2006) Based on IEEE Journal Publications, Computer and Information Science, 5 (4), 1-24.
Heinze, T., Shapira, P., Senker, J., & Kuhlmann, S. (2007). Identifying creative research accomplishments: Methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics. Scientometrics, 70 (1), 125–152.
Hu., G; Carley, S & Tang, L (2012). Visualizing Nanotechnology Research in Canada: Evidence from Publication Activities, 1990-2009. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 550-562.
Hui-Zhen, F and Yuh-Shan, H. (2015). Highly cited Canada articles in Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Canadian Social Science, 11 (3), 50-62.
Kostoff, R. N., Stump, J. A., Johnson, D., Murday, J. S., Lau, C. G. Y., & Tolles, W. M. (2006). The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(3–4), 301–321.
Lee, L. L., Chan, C. K., Ngiam, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2006). Nanotechnology patent landscape 2006. NANO, 1(2), 101–113.
Rosei, F. (2008). Special issue: On nanotechnology in Canada. International Journal of Nanotechnology, 5 (9–12), 897–899.
Subramanyam, K. (1993). “Bibliometric Study of Research Collaboration: A Review.” Journal of Information Science, 6 (1): 33-38.
Tang, L., Shapira., P. (2012). Effects of international collaboration and knowledge moderation on China’s nanotechnology research impacts, Journal of Technology Management in China, 7 (1), 94-110. www.emeraldinsight.com/1746-8779.htm
Velmurugan, C & Radhakrishnan, N. (2015). Research analysis by means of Scientometric techniques on Biotechnology, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Consortium (IJMC), 2(1), 256-265.
Velmurugan, C & Radhakrishnan, N. (2015). A Scientometric Analysis of Research Papers Published on Pharmacognosy as reflected in the Web of Science. Advances in Pharmacognosy and Phytomedicine, 1(1), 27-40.
Velmurugan, C & Radhakrishnan, N. (2015). Journal of Information Literacy: A Scientometric Profile, Journal of Information Sciences and Application, 3 (1), 1-9.
Velmurugan, C & Radhakrishnan, N. (2015). Quantitative Analysis of Scientific Publications Output on Engineering Journal: A Scientometric Study, Journal of Information Sciences and Application, 3 (1), 19-30.
Velmurugan, C & Radhakrishnan, N. (2015). Literature output of Supply Chain Management: A Scientometric approach, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 3(2), 31-44.
Velmurugan, C & Radhakrishnan, N. (2015). Authorship trends and collaborative research work on Library Herald: a Scientometric analysis, In Information Science and Digital Libraries, edited by Somvir, International Research Publication House, Delhi, 183-197.
Velmurugan, C. (2013). Research Trends in Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR): A Bibliometric Study, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Paper 1043. Retrieved 6 March from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1043.
Velmurugan, C. (2013). Scientometric analysis: Annals of Library and Information Studies Publications Output during 2007-2012, International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 3 (3), 58-65.
Velmurugan, C. (2013). Bibliometric analysis with special reference to Authorship Pattern and Collaborative Research Output of Annals of Library and Information Studies for the Year 2007 – 2012. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 3 (3), 13-21.
Velmurugan, C. (2014). Research Trends in Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics (IJPAP) for the Year 2009 – 2012, Asian Review of Social Sciences, 3 (1), 24-28.
Velmurugan, C & Radhakrishnan, N. (2014). Publication Research Trends on Technical Review Journal: A Scientometric Study, International Journal of Digital Library Services (IJDLS), 4 (3), 45-55.
Yegul, M. F., Yavuz, M., & Guild, P. (2008). Nanotechnology: Canada’s position in scientific publications and patents. PICMET 2008 Proceedings, 27–31 July. Cape Town, South Africa.
Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Porter, A. L. (2008). Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(6), 981–986.
A scientometric assessment of the scientific publications has been considered in this analysis by examining annual growth rate of publications, collaborative countries, and territories, preferred subject areas and research work, prolific organizations and institutions and top-ranked journals and highly productive papers etc. This paper focuses on the literature growth and development in Nanotechnology in Canada as reflected in the web of science data database. During the period between 1994 and 2014, a total 576 scientific research papers along with cited references are 34955 were published in the field in Canada. The average number of literature output were published per year was 33.88 and the greatest number of publications were published in 2013 and 2014 respectively a total number of authors 2213 were identified and the maximum number of authors i.e. 364 and the mean value of 4.77 were in the year 2014. Out of 15804 citations, the greatest number of 2791 citations in the year 2008 (52 papers, 23 h-index) and highest average citation per paper were 60.74 in the year 2007. From this study, researchers, scientists, subject specialists, students, administrators, policy makers, academicians, Library and Information Science professionals, and faculty members will be benefited due to the scientific and effective investigation.