Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Date of this Version



1- Bigdeli Z, Azimi MH, Zare F. Study of affecting Factors the search for health information on the web by women working in the Khuzestan Water and Power Authority. Libr Inform Sci Q. 2010;15(1):165-84.

2- Adeyoyin SO, Oyewusi FO. A survey of the needs and utilization of health information among young adults in Abeokuta, Ogun state, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2015.

3- Okhovati M, Sharifpoor E, Hamzeh Zadeh M, Shahsavari M. The role of public libraries on Kerman health information seeking behavior. Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics. 2016;3(1):48-56.

4- Broussard R, Doty P. Toward an understanding of fiction and information behavior. InProceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & Technology 2016. American Society for Information Science.

5- Scheibe K, Fietkiewicz KJ, Stock WG. Information behavior on social live streaming services. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice. 2016;4(2):6-20.

6- Miri A, Ghanbari MA, Najafi A. The relationship between health literacy and the recovery rate of cardiovascular patients after bypass surgery. Journal of Health Literacy. 2016;1(2):83-91.

7- Raeisi M, Javadzade H, Mostafavi F, Tavassoli E, Sharifirad GH. Health literacy and health promoting behaviors among older adults. J Health Syst Res. 2013;9(8):827-36.

8- Tehrani H. Media health literacy. Journal of Health Literacy. 2016;1(3):141-6.

9- Mahmoudi H, Taheri A. Relation between information literacy and health literacy of students in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Human Information Interaction. 2015;2(2):31-41.

10- Rains SA. Perceptions of traditional information sources and use of the world wide web to seek health information: findings from the health information national trends survey. Journal of health communication. 2007;12(7):667-80.

11- Cutrona SL, Mazor KM, Vieux SN, Luger TM, Volkman JE, Rutten LJ. Health information-seeking on behalf of others: characteristics of “surrogate seekers”. Journal of cancer education. 2015;30(1):12-9.

12- Wilson VL. Behavioural change in type 1 diabetes self-management: Why and how?. Health Education Journal. 2009;68(4):320-7.

13- Courtenay-Quirk C, Horvath KJ, Ding H, Fisher H, McFarlane M, Kachur R, O'leary A, Rosser BS, Harwood E. Perceptions of HIV-related websites among persons recently diagnosed with HIV. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2010;24(2):105-15.

14- Tennant B, Stellefson M, Dodd V, Chaney B, Chaney D, Paige S, Alber J. eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults. Journal of medical Internet research. 2015;17(3).

15- Chen YY, Li CM, Liang JC, Tsai CC. Health information obtained from the internet and changes in medical decision making: questionnaire development and cross-sectional survey. Journal of medical Internet research. 2018;20(2).

16- Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ. Using Web 2.0 technologies to enhance evidence-based medical information. Journal of health communication. 2011;16(sup1):45-58.

17- Raats CI, van Veenendaal H, Versluijs MM, Burgers JS. A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines. Patient education and counseling. 2008;73(3):413-7.

18- Adams SA. Blog-based applications and health information: two case studies that illustrate important questions for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) research. International journal of medical informatics. 2010;79(6):89-96.

19- Donald M, Ware RS, Ozolins IZ, Begum N, Crowther R, Bain C. The role of patient activation in frequent attendance at primary care: a population-based study of people with chronic disease. Patient education and counseling. 2011;83(2):217-21.

20- Alpay L, Toussaint P, Zwetsloot-Schonk B. Supporting healthcare communication enabled by information and communication technology: Can HCI and related cognitive aspects help?. InProceedings of the Conference on Dutch Directions in HCI 2004. ACM.

21- Riahi A, Hariri N, Nooshinfard F. Study of health Information needs and barriers to access among afghan and iraqi immigrants in Iran. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2015;7(3):597-610.

22- Zare Gavgani V, Qeisari E, Asghari Jafarabadi M. Health information seeking behavior (HISB): a study of a developing country. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2013.

23- Coffman MJ, Norton CK. Demands of immigration, health literacy, and depression in recent Latino immigrants. Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2010;22(2):116-22.

24- Bakar AB. Information seeking behaviours of rural women in Malaysia. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2011.

25- LaJoie AS, Ridner SL. Health information and health risk behaviors in a sample of college students. The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association. 2009;107(2):58-63.

26- Dart J, Gallois C, Yellowlees P. Community health information sources—a survey in three disparate communities. Australian Health Review. 2008;32(1):186-96.

27- St. Jean B, Subramaniam M, Taylor NG, Follman R, Kodama C, Casciotti D. The influence of positive hypothesis testing on youths’ online health-related information seeking. New Library World. 2015;116(3/4):136-54.

28- Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC public health. 2013;13(1):658.

29- Amini M, Mostafavizade M. Survey on health literacy of librarians in Tehran University and Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Depiction of Health. 2017;7(4):37-45.

30- Zare A, Rahimi S, Soofi K. The study of the information seeking behavior of health literacy among students of Razi University of Kermanshah. Journal of Health Literacy. 2017;2(2):63-72.

31- Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ. Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS quarterly. 2007;31(4).

32- Lenz ER. Information seeking: a component of client decisions and health behavior. Advances in Nursing Science. 1984.

33- Gray NJ, Klein JD, Noyce PR, Sesselberg TS, Cantrill JA. Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. Social science & medicine. 2005;60(7):1467-78.

34- Caiata-Zufferey M, Abraham A, Sommerhalder K, Schulz PJ. Online health information seeking in the context of the medical consultation in Switzerland. Qualitative health research. 2010;20(8):1050-61.

35- Strekalova YA. Finding motivation: online information seeking following newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. Qualitative health research. 2016;26(9):1180-90.

36- Longo DR, Schubert SL, Wright BA, LeMaster J, Williams CD, Clore JN. Health information seeking, receipt, and use in diabetes self-management. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2010;8(4):334-40.

37- Broom A. Virtually healthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qualitative health research. 2005;15(3):325-45.

38- Cotten SR, Gupta SS. Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Social science & medicine. 2004;59(9):1795-806.

39- Lowrey W, Anderson WB. The impact of internet use on the public perception of physicians: a perspective from the sociology of professions literature. Health communication. 2006;19(2):125-31.

40- Dastani M, Ansari M, Sattari M. Evaluation of eHealth Literacy among Non-Clinical Graduate Students; An Iranian Experience. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2018.


Introduction: Nowadays, the need for health information has grown all over the world, and this information often changes behavior and health decisions. This research was conducted with the aim of investigating the seeking behavior and health information channels in students of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences.

Methods: In this Analytic-descriptive study, 115 individuals from health department, 110 individuals from nursing department, 93 individuals from medical department and 112 individuals from paramedical department were randomly selected and analyzed. The data collection tool was a questionnaire whose validity and reliability were obtained in previous studies. Collected data analyzed using SPSS 20.

Results: The findings show that more students are seeking information about the type of sickness with a mean of 3.29 and their treatment with an average of 3.20, and internet resources and doctors are the most commonly used among students. There is a significant difference between the use of different sources of health information seeking among students (P<0.05). There was also no significant difference between the use of different sources of health information seeking among students at different faculties (P>0.05).

Conclusion: The results of this study provide a clear picture of the health information seeking behavior in students of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences. According to the goals of seeking for health information and resources, It can be said that the results of seeking for students can affect their decision making and choice in treating sickness and promoting their health. Therefore, improving the health literacy of students can have a positive effect on their health promotion.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.