Date of this Version
Aijing, L., & Jin, Y. (2015). Design of the Hospital Integrated Information Management System Based on Cloud Platform. The West Indian medical journal, 64(5), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2016.057
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. Available from: http://ijlis.org/img/2017_Vol_7_Issue_3/1-7.pdf
De Bruin, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). The Ethics of Cloud Computing. Science and engineering ethics. 23(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9759-0
Hanumanth, R. (2017). Scientometric analysis of “IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing: 2013-2016. International Journal of Library and Information Studies. 7(3). Available from: http://ijlis.org/img/2017_Vol_7_Issue_3/267-273.pdf
Heilig, L. & Voß, S. (2014). A Scientometric Analysis of Cloud Computing Literature. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2(3), 266-278. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2014.2321168
Jan, R., Wasim, R., & Hafiz, O. (2015). Scientometric Analysis of Cloud Computing. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Available from: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1273
Mayo, R., Pearson, K., Avrin, D. & Leung, J. (2017). The Economic and Social Value of an Image Exchange Network: A Case for the Cloud. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 14(1), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.07.026
Mell, P. & Grance T. (2011). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved from: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-145.pdf
Schweitzer, E. J. (2011). Reconciliation of the cloud computing model with US federal electronic health record regulations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 19(2), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000162
Siddagangaiah, K.N. (2017). Global Research Productivity in Cloud Computing: A Bibliometric Study. International Journal of Library and InformationStudies, 7(3), 1-7. http://ijlis.org/img/2017_Vol_7_Issue_3/1-7.pdf
Sivakumaren, K.S., Swaminathan, S., & Karthikeyan, G. (2015). Growth and development of publications on cloud computing: A scientometric analysis. International Journal of Information Library and Society, 1 (1), 37-43. Available from: http://www.publishingindia.com/GetBrochure.aspx?query=UERGQnJvY2h1cmVzfC8xMjY3LnBkZnwvMTI2Ny5wZGY=
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Noyons, E. C., & Buter, R. K. (2010). Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 82(3), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0173-0
Introduction: Cloud computing is an innovative paradigm meeting the user's demand for accessing a shared source comprising adjustable computational sources, such as servers and applied programs. An increase in the costs of information technology, emerging problems with updating software and hardware, and expanded storage volume, make it possible to utilize cloud-based health information cases. Organizations have focused on cloud platform-based services as a new opportunity to develop the software industry for healthcare. The aim of the research is to conduct a bibliometric study of the scientific productions on "health cloud".
Methodology: The present study, applied in nature, was conducted using a bibliometric and scientometric method. It was conducted in 2018 using PubMed and key portmanteaus over the period 2009-2018. Subjected to the application of input and output standards, 491 research papers were selected for analysis.
Findings: The findings revealed that the production of health cloud-focused papers over a decade, excluding those in 2017, had an upward trend. The US, India, and China were the most productive in this respect. Having presented 5 papers on cloud computing, Costa, Lee, Malamateniou, Stoicu-Tivadar, Vassilacopoulos, writers, were most productive. The greatest co-occurrence was that of the words Internet, electronic health records, computer security, information storage and retrieval, algorithms, confidentiality, female, male, delivery of health care, computer communication networks, medical informatics, mobile applications, data mining, and health information exchang.
Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate the leading status of the USA in health cloud publications. In view of the recognition received for using cloud computing, the trend of the papers in the base was upward in nature. On analysis of the co-occurrence of words, the largest cluster was that of cloud computing with 6 items focused on: The Internet of Things (IoT), Electronic health record, healthcare, and e-health in one cluster, indicating the continuity of the issues.