Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Date of this Version



Ahmed, O. H., Sullivan, S. J., Schneiders, A. G., & McCrory, P. R. (2012). Concussion information online: evaluation of information quality, content and readability of concussion-related websites. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 46(9), 675–683.

Aldairy, T., Laverick, S., & McIntyre, G. T. (2012). Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid? The European Journal of Orthodontics, 34(4), 466–469.

Andreassen, H. K., Bujnowska-Fedak, M. M., Chronaki, C. E., Dumitru, R. C., Pudule, I., Santana, S., … Wynn, R. (2007). European citizens’ use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health, 7(1), 1.

Aslani, A., Pournik, O., Abu-Hanna, A., & Eslami, S. (2013). Web-site evaluation tools: a case study in reproductive health information. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 205, 895–899.

Austin Peay State University. (2015). Reliable and Unreliable Sources. Retrieved from

Bartlett, Y. K., & Coulson, N. S. (2011). An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects health professional/patient communication. Patient Education and Counseling, 83(1), 113–119.

Bedell, S. E., Agrawal, A., & Petersen, L. E. (2004). A systematic critique of diabetes on the world wide web for patients and their physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73(9), 687–694.

Benigeri, M., & Pluye, P. (2003). Shortcomings of health information on the Internet. Health Promotion International, 18(4), 381–386.

Bernstam, E. V., Walji, M. F., Sagaram, S., Sagaram, D., Johnson, C. W., Meric-Bernstam, F., & Meric‐Bernstam, F. (2008). Commonly cited website quality criteria are not effective at identifying inaccurate online information about breast cancer. Cancer, 112(6), 1206–1213.

Bruce-Brand, R. A., Baker, J. F., Byrne, D. P., Hogan, N. A., & McCarthy, T. (2013). Assessment of the Quality and Content of Information on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on the Internet. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 29(6), 1095–1100.

Burke, T. P., Fenelon, C., Dalton, D., Mohan, H., & Schmidt, K. (2015). Availability of accessible and high-quality information on the internet for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 24(5), 135–140.

Cancer Information on the Internet. (2016). Retrieved February 20, 2018, from

Clark, E. J. (2002). Health care web sites: Are they reliable? Journal of Medical Systems, 26(6), 519–528.

Coulter, A., Ellins, J., Swain, D., Clarke, A., Heron, P., Rasul, F., … Sheldon, H. Assessing the quality of information to support people in making decisions about their health and healthcare. , Picker Institute Europe § (2006).

Coulter, & Angela. (2011). Engaging Patients In Healthcare. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

De Boer, M. J., Versteegen, G. J., & van Wijhe, M. (2007). Patients’ use of the Internet for pain-related medical information. Patient Education and Counseling, 68(1), 86–97.

Diaz, J. A., Griffith, R. A., Ng, J. J., Reinert, S. E., Friedmann, P. D., & Moulton, A. W. (2002). Patients’ Use of the Internet for Medical Information. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(3), 180–185.

Elliott, A. D. A. D., Bartel, A. F. P. A. F., Simonson, D., & Roukis, T. S. T. S. (2015). Is the Internet a Reliable Source of Information for Patients Seeking Total Ankle Replacement? Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 54(3), 378–381.

Ellsworth, B., Patel, H., & Kamath, A. F. (2016). Assessment of Quality and Content of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery: Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 32(10), 2082.

Enge, E., Spencer, S., & Stricchiola, J. (2015). The Art Of SEO Mastering Search Engine Optimization. In O’Reilly.

Fast, A. M., Deibert, C. M., Hruby, G. W., & Glassberg, K. I. (2013). Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 9(2), 151–156.

Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2013). Trusting expert- versus user-generated ratings online: The role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1626–1634.

Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Health Online 2013. Pew internet & American Life Project. 2013.

Goslin, R. A., & Elhassan, H. A. (2013). Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery. The Laryngoscope, 123(7), 1626–1631.

Grewal, P., & Alagaratnam, S. (2013). The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet. International Journal of Surgery, 11(5), 410–413.

Hamzehei, R., Ansari, M., Rahmatizadeh, S., & Valizadeh-Haghi, S. (2018). Websites as a tool for public health education: determining the trustworthiness of health websites on Ebola disease. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 10(3).

Haymes, A. T. (2016). The Quality of Rhinoplasty Health Information on the Internet. Ann Plast Surg, 76(2), 143–149.

Hendrick, P. A., Ahmed, O. H., Bankier, S. S., Chan, T. J., Crawford, S. A., Ryder, C. R., … Schneiders, A. G. (2012). Acute low back pain information online: an evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites. Manual Therapy, 17(4), 318.

Hirasawa, R., Saito, K., Yachi, Y., Ibe, Y., Kodama, S., Asumi, M., … Sone, H. (2012). Quality of Internet information related to the Mediterranean diet. Public Health Nutrition, 15(5), 885–893.

Hornik, R., Parvanta, S., Mello, S., Freres, D., Kelly, B., & Schwartz, J. S. (2013). Effects of Scanning—Routine Health Information Exposure—on Cancer Screening and Prevention Behaviors in the General Population. Journal of Health Communication, 18(12), 1422.

Hu, X., Bell, R. A., Kravitz, R. L., & Orrange, S. (2012). The prepared patient: information seeking of online support group members before their medical appointments. Journal of Health Communication, 17(8), 960–978.

Kaicker, J., Debono, V. B., Dang, W., Buckley, N., & Thabane, L. (2010). Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. BMC Medicine, 8(1), 59.

Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Cochand, S., & Zullino, D. (2008). Quality of Web-based information on cocaine addiction. Patient Education and Counseling, 72(2), 336–341.

Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Zullino, D., & Khan, R. (2012). HON Label and DISCERN as Content Quality Indicators of Health-Related Websites. Psychiatric Quarterly, 83(1), 15–27.

Kim, D., & Chang, H. (2007). Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: An application of the extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(11), 790–800.

Kunst, H. (2002). Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. Bmj, 324(7337), 581–582.

Livas, C., Delli, K., & Ren, Y. (2013). Quality evaluation of the available Internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment. The Angle Orthodontist, 83(3), 500–506.

López-Jornet, P., & Camacho-Alonso, F. (2010). The quality of internet information relating to oral leukoplakia. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 15(5), 727–731.

Lorence, D. P., Park, H., & Fox, S. (2006). Racial disparities in health information access: resilience of the digital divide. Journal of Medical Systems, 30(4), 241–249.

Marshall, L. A., & Williams, D. (2006). Health information: does quality count for the consumer? How consumers evaluate the quality of health information materials across a variety of media. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 38(3), 141–156.

Moldovan-Johnson, M., Martinez, L., Lewis, N., Freres, D., & Hornik, R. C. (2014). The Role of Patient Clinician Information Engagement and Information Seeking from Nonmedical Channels in Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Cancer Patients. Journal of Health Communication, 19(12), 1359.

Moore, D., & Ayers, S. (2011). A review of postnatal mental health websites: help for healthcare professionals and patients. Arch Womens Ment Health, 14(6), 443–452.

Moorhead, S. A., Hazlett, D. E., Harrison, L., Carroll, J. K., Irwin, A., & Hoving, C. (2013). A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(4), e85.

Morahan-Martin, J. M. (2004). How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychol Behav, 7(5), 497–510.

Morel, V., Chatton, A., Cochand, S., Zullino, D., & Khazaal, Y. (2008). Quality of web-based information on bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 110(3), 265–269.

Mun, Y. Y., Yoon, J. J., Davis, J. M., & Lee, T. (2013). Untangling the antecedents of initial trust in Web-based health information: The roles of argument quality, source expertise, and user perceptions of information quality and risk. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 284–295.

Nassiri, M., Bruce-Brand, R. A., O’Neill, F., Chenouri, S., & Curtin, P. (2015). Perthes Disease: The Quality and Reliability of Information on the Internet. J Pediatr Orthop, 35(5), 530–535.

Nghiem, A. Z., Mahmoud, Y., & Som, R. (2016). Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer. The Breast, 25, 34–37.

Ostry, A., Young, M. L., & Hughes, M. (2008). The quality of nutritional information available on popular websites: a content analysis. Health Education Research, 23(4), 648–655.

Patel, U., & Cobourne, M. T. (2011). Orthodontic extractions and the Internet: Quality of online information available to the public. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139(2), e103–e109.

PURCELL, K., BRENNER, J. ;, & RAINIE, L. E. E. (2012). Search Engine Use 2012.

Rahmatizadeh, S., & Valizadeh-Haghi, S. (2018). Evaluating the trustworthiness of consumer-oriented health websites on diabetes. Library Philosophy and Practice.

Ream, E., Blows, E., Scanlon, K., & Richardson, A. (2009). An investigation of the quality of breast cancer information provided on the internet by voluntary organisations in Great Britain. Patient Educ Couns, 76(1), 10–15.

Ritchie, L., Tornari, C., Patel, P. M., & Lakhani, R. (2016). Glue ear: How good is the information on the World Wide Web? Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 130(2), 157–161.

Sassenberg, K., & Greving, H. (2016). Internet Searching About Disease Elicits a Positive Perception of Own Health When Severity of Illness Is High: A Longitudinal Questionnaire Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(3).

ShahrabiFarahani, N., Shekofteh, M., Kazerani, M., & Emami, Z. (2018). An Evaluation of Persian Diabetes Websites based on WebMedQual (2016). Iranian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 20(3), 142–150.

Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Harris, P. R., & Fishwick, L. (2007). How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? Social Science and Medicine, 64(9), 1853–1862.

Starman, J. S., Gettys, F. K., Capo, J. A., Fleischli, J. E., Norton, H. J., & Karunakar, M. A. (2010). Quality and Content of Internet-Based Information for Ten Common Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Diagnoses. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 92(7), 1612–1618.

Steckelberg, J. M. (2015). What is MERS-CoV, and what should I do?

Sullivan, T. B., Anderson, J. T., Ahn, U. M., & Ahn, N. U. (2014). Can Internet Information on Vertebroplasty be a Reliable Means of Patient Self-education? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 472(5), 1597–1604.

Tavare, A. N., Alsafi, A., & Hamady, M. S. (2012). Analysis of the quality of information obtained about uterine artery embolization from the internet. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 35(6), 1355–1362.

The HON Code of Conduct for medical and health Web sites (HONcode). (n.d.). Retrieved November 10, 2017, from

Valizadeh-Haghi, S., & Rahmatizadeh, S. (2018). Evaluation of the Quality and Accessibility of Available Websites on Kidney Transplantation. Urology Journal.

Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134–144.

Weymann, N., Harter, M., & Dirmaier, J. (2014). Quality of online information on type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Health Promotion International, 30(4), 821–831.

WHO. (2019). Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Retrieved June 12, 2019, from

WHO EMRO | MERS situation update, April 2019 | MERS-CoV | Epidemic and pandemic diseases. (2019). Retrieved June 12, 2019, from

Winker, M. A., Flanagin, A., Chi-Lum, B., White, J., Andrews, K., Kennett, R. L., … et al. (2000). Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: Principles governing ama web sites. JAMA, 283(12), 1600–1606.


Background: The most recent MERS outbreak has raised questions about prevention and symptoms since there is currently no vaccine to prevent MERS. People can help protect themselves from this illness by taking everyday preventive actions. To do so, it is helpful to get medical information on the Internet about this illness. Regarding the importance of ensuring the provision of accurate online information, the aim of this study was to assess the credibility of health websites about MERS by using HONcode tool.

Materials and methods: The term “MERS” was searched in Google, Yahoo, and Bing and the first three pages reported by each search engine were selected for evaluation. After excluding 26 websites, 64 unique websites were eligible for examination. Subsequently, the trustworthiness of the websites was then evaluated by using the HONcode of conducts quality rating tool.

Results: Our findings indicate that most of the retrieved websites were commercial and governmental (37.5%). Furthermore, only 7 out of 64 websites were officially HONcode certified. In general, the health websites regarding MERS were of poor credibility and while searching for MERS information people will encounter websites which include more commercial content rather than educational.

Conclusion: The internet is a place to educate individuals on their health condition and possible treatment options. Nevertheless, the internet cannot replace the role of health professionals in patient education. Regarding the poor credibility of MERS related websites, directing patients to reliable sources of online health information is important, mainly because search engine rank does not assure the trustworthiness of websites.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.